NCT05282927

Brief Summary

Implementing Group Physical Therapy (PT) for Veterans with Knee Osteoarthritis (OA): Function QUERI 2.0 (Group PT) aims to implement, evaluate and sustain Group PT in 16 VA sites using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework, which will compare implementation strategies while also gathering information about the clinical intervention and related outcomes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
19

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 7, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 21, 2022

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 18, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 18, 2024

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 10, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

March 7, 2022

Results QC Date

January 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Osteoarthritis of KneeFunctional IndependenceQuality of LifeImplementation ScienceVeteransGroup PhysiotherapyPhysical Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Penetration

    Penetration is defined as the average number of patients enrolling in the group physical therapy (PT) program on a monthly basis (defined as completing at least one class).

    7-12 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Fidelity

    7-12 months

  • Adoption

    7-12 months

Study Arms (2)

Foundational REP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Foundational REP uses the Replicating Effective Program implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: Stakeholder engagement; Toolkit; SharePoint access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist sites with tracking their own data; and Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support.

Other: Implementation Strategy: Foundational REP

Enhanced REP

EXPERIMENTAL

EnREP begins with the same activities as foundational REP. Sites that do not meet EBP-specific a priori benchmarks reflecting adoption within 6 months will continue with foundational REP and will receive higher intensity support for a period of 6 months (enREP). Additionally, sites randomized to enREP that met adoption benchmarks but did do not meet the sustainment benchmark, will also receive intensified implementation support for the remainder of the study period (3 months). The higher intensity support will include one-on-one calls approximately every 3 to 4 weeks between site implementation teams and a trained practice facilitator (from Function QUERI team). The facilitator will coach individual sites using techniques, processes, and activities to help teams make decisions and identify and solve problems. Facilitators' actions will depend on each site's needs and clinical context.

Other: Implementation Strategy: Enhanced REP (enREP)

Interventions

The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for group PT sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. Enhanced REP. The investigators propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting Group PT for context and provides tools for ongoing evaluation (defined as foundational REP), will be sufficient for some but not all sites to successfully implement group PT as a clinical service.

Foundational REP

The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for sites that have not met implementation adoption benchmarks, specifically Foundational REP vs. EnREP. The investigators posit that monitoring sites' progress and adding, for sites with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as EnREP) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value.

Enhanced REP

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participating sites must meet the following criteria: 1) Clinical personnel on staff to conduct initial evaluations and lead group classes (e,g, physical therapist, PT assistant, kinesiotherapist): this should include at least 1 primary person and 1 back-up person to cover all aspects of program delivery, 2) Offer outpatient PT service, 3) Space to conduct group sessions (if implementing in-person Group PT classes), and (4) Submission of a signed participation agreement.
  • Enrolled sites will all be exposed to Foundational REP.
  • Sites not meeting benchmarks for adoption or sustainment of Group PT will receive higher-intensity implementation support (Enhanced REP).

You may not qualify if:

  • The one Group PT site that previously participated in Function QUERI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01058304) will be excluded from enrollment in this study.
  • Sites that are currently offering a group class specifically for knee OA will not be eligible to participate.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, 27705-3875, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Allen KD, Webb S, Coffman CJ, Anderson L, Cummin G, Drake C, Tucker M, Webster A, Sperber N, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Ballengee LA, Abbate LM, Hoenig H, Fullenkamp N, Van Houtven CH, Hastings SN. Implementation of Group Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Oct 1;8(10):e2535038. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.35038.

  • Webb S, Drake C, Coffman CJ, Sullivan C, Sperber N, Tucker M, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Kaufman BG, Pura JA, Anderson L, Hastings SN, Van Houtven CH, Abbate LM, Hoenig H, Ballengee LA, Wang V, Allen KD. Group physical therapy for knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Oct 12;4(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00502-7.

  • Hughes JM, Zullig LL, Choate AL, Decosimo KP, Wang V, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Nicole Hastings S. Intensification of Implementation Strategies: Developing a Model of Foundational and Enhanced Implementation Approaches to Support National Adoption and Scale-up. Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac130.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Kelli Allen
Organization
Durham VA Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT)

Study Officials

  • Kelli Dominick Allen, PhD

    Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Courtney H Van Houtven, PhD

    Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Susan N. Hastings, MD MHSc

    Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel cluster-randomized trial (parallel-CRT): used in pragmatic evaluations of health program or policy interventions, where half the clusters (in this case, VA medical centers) are randomly assigned to two interventions: Foundational REP (active comparator) vs. Enhanced REP (experimental)
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2022

First Posted

March 16, 2022

Study Start

June 21, 2022

Primary Completion

May 18, 2024

Study Completion

May 18, 2024

Last Updated

April 10, 2025

Results First Posted

April 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be available upon request. Prior to distribution, a local privacy officer and study statistician will certify that the dataset contains no protected health information (PHI). Data will be provided to requestor in electronic format. Sufficient data and descriptors will be made available to duplicate statistical analysis and confirm conclusions in publication. No data or statistical code that could lead to re-identification of individuals will be released. Data will be stored \& maintained in an approved, secured location as described in the VA Research Data Inventory Form. The study statistician will create de-identified, publication-specific datasets that includes all variables presented in the study publication. Data will only be released per appropriate authorizations or agreements. Written agreements will specify that recipients are prohibited from taking steps to re-identify any individual whose data are included in the dataset.

Time Frame
Available upon request
Access Criteria
Data will only be released per appropriate authorizations or agreements. Written agreements will specify that recipients are prohibited from taking steps to re- identify any individual whose data are included in the dataset.

Locations