Reconstructive Management of Peri-implantitis
Significance of Barrier Membrane in the Reconstructive Management of Peri-implantitis: A RCT
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
With the growing burden of peri-implantitis around the globe, interest has flourished on the management of this pathology. Nevertheless, lack of consensus exists in the pursuit of a predictable therapy. Different therapeutic modalities have been advocated. Non-surgical therapy as a sole modality is often insufficient to resolve inflammation. Surgical interventions have demonstrated more favorable outcomes. Amongst these, evidence supported the application of resective, reconstructive, or combined approaches to limit progressive bone loss and achieve soft tissue health. Nevertheless, up to date, the most suitable modality remains unknown and the decision-making process derives from the understanding acquired from the management of periodontitis. One critical element regarded to successfully resolve peri-implantitis is to efficiently detoxify the contaminated implant surface. Mechanical, pharmacological and chemical strategies have been proposed to eliminate bacterial plaque and remnants from the implant surface. However, evidence has not demonstrated superiority of a given detoxification agent/strategy. In this sense, the significance of barrier membranes is not yet well understood. Roos-Jansaker in 2014 showed that the additional use of barrier membranes did not improve the outcome. Nevertheless, since then this subject has not been a matter of research.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 27, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2022
CompletedDecember 5, 2024
December 1, 2024
3.6 years
September 12, 2021
December 4, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in clinical parameters
Number of patients where the disease was resolved. At implant level the changes in bleeding on probing and changes in probing pocket depths will be recorded as well
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Changes in Bone level
12-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Resorbable cross-linked barrier membrane
EXPERIMENTALBone graft will be covered with a resorbable barrier membrane to exclude undesired cells from the area aimed at being regenerated (peri-implantitis bone defect)
No barrier membrane
EXPERIMENTALBone graft will be solely packed in the peri-implantitis bone defect with no membrane to cover
Interventions
A full-thickness flap was raised to ensure sufficient access. Debridement of granulation tissue was subsequently conducted using a "mini-five" curette (Hu-Friedy) and site-specific Gracey curettes (Hu-Friedy). The surgical approach was tailored to the clinical scenario. Specifically, resective therapy by means of implantoplasty was performed for supracrestal defects (Meisinger LLC, Nauss, Germany). Surface detoxification was performed with 3% hydrogen peroxide during 2 minutes and irrigation with 0.12% chlorhexidine. The intraosseous compartment was grafted using mineralized and demineralized bone graft (LifeNet Health, Virginia, USA). The graft was compartmentalized in the test group with a collagen porcine resorbable membrane (RTM, Cytoplast, California, USA) adapted to the defect morphology. Nylon 5.0 (Resorba Sutures, Osteogenics Biomedical, Lubbock, Texas) was used for suturing, ensuring primary wound closure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-smokers
- No use of antibiotics recently
- No metabolic disorder
- Infra-osseous or combined peri-implantitis defect
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers
- Pregnant
- Metabolic disorders that affect bone healing
- Supra-crestal defects
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinica CICOM
Badajoz, 06011, Spain
Related Publications (3)
Monje A, Pons R, Roccuzzo A, Salvi GE, Nart J. Reconstructive therapy for the management of peri-implantitis via submerged guided bone regeneration: A prospective case series. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Jun;22(3):342-350. doi: 10.1111/cid.12913. Epub 2020 May 14.
PMID: 32410379BACKGROUNDMonje A, Pons R, Amerio E, Wang HL, Nart J. Resolution of peri-implantitis by means of implantoplasty as adjunct to surgical therapy: A retrospective study. J Periodontol. 2022 Jan;93(1):110-122. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0103. Epub 2021 May 15.
PMID: 33904175RESULTMonje A, Pons R, Vilarrasa J, Nart J, Wang HL. Significance of barrier membrane on the reconstructive therapy of peri-implantitis: A randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2023 Mar;94(3):323-335. doi: 10.1002/JPER.22-0511. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
PMID: 36399349DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2021
First Posted
March 16, 2022
Study Start
March 27, 2019
Primary Completion
November 15, 2022
Study Completion
November 16, 2022
Last Updated
December 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12