Sleep Disorder Manage in Emotional Freedom Techniques vs Sleep Hygiene Education Group Therapy
Effectiveness of Emotional Freedom Techniques vs Sleep Hygiene Education Group Therapy (SHE) in Management of Sleep Disorders Among Elderly
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sleep disorders are common among elderly persons, with deleterious effects on their physical and mental health. Many approaches are used to manage such disorders. Aim of the study: To compare the Emotional Freedom Techniques-Insomnia (EFT-I) and Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) group therapy as two treatments for insomnia in a geriatric population when delivered, and their effects on sleep quality, depression, and life satisfaction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 3, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 21, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2022
CompletedMarch 11, 2022
March 1, 2022
3 months
February 19, 2022
March 1, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
poor quality sleep (PSQI)
The tool consists of 19 items from which seven components covering different aspects of sleep are computed to produce one composite global score. These are sleep latency asking about how long it takes to fall asleep, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency measuring the percentage of sleep time of total bedtime, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, daytime dysfunction, in addition to overall subjective sleep quality. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale, with a higher score indicating worse quality. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. For categorical analysis, the total score in dichotomized into good sleep quality (total score \<=5), and poor sleep quality (total score \>5) \[15\].
The tool filling can be completed in 5-10 minutes
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)
The Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item version. It also helps in the assessment of the severity of these symptoms and in treatment follow-up. we applied the modifed 15-question shorter version as proposed by Sheikh and Yesavage 1986, and its validity was put in evidence. The tool has 15 items such as: "Are you basically satisfied with your life?", "Do you often get bored?"," Do you feel happy most of the time?", "Do you think that most people are better off than you are?". The response to each item is either Yes or No. These are scored 1 and zero respectively. The scoring was reversed for positive items so that a higher score indicates more severe depression. The scores of the items are summed-up giving a total score ranging from 0 to 15. For categorical analysis, the total score in dichotomized into: no depression (total score \<=5), and depression (total score \>5). The validated Arabic version of this tool was used in the present study.
The tool filling can be completed in 5-10 minutes
Satisfaction with Life (SWL) scale
The third tool was the Satisfaction with Life (SWL) scale. This tool was developed by Diener et al. \[23\], to assess a person's to overall subjective feeling of satisfaction with his/her life. The tool consists of five items such as "In most ways my life is close to my ideal", "If I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing." The responses are on a 7-point Likert type scale ranging from "strongly disagree' to "strongly agree." These are scored from one to seven. The scores of the items are summed-up giving a total score ranging from 5 to 35. For categorical analysis, the total score in dichotomized into: dissatisfied (total score 5-20), and satisfied (total score 21-35). Research demonstrated high tool validity and reliability \[24, 25\]. Arabic version of this tool was used in the present study. The validity of this Scale according to Cronbach's alpha was 0.87
The tool filling can be completed in 5-10 minutes
Pilot study
A pilot study was conducted on six patients representing 10% of computed sample size to test the clarity of the data collection form and the feasibility of the research process. Needed modifications were carried out based on the results of the pilot study, and the tool was finalized accordingly. The patients involved in the pilot were excluded from the study to avoid contamination of the study sample.
two months
Study Arms (2)
Control (EFT)
OTHERhad a form of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) adapted for use with insomnia (EFT-I)
Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) intervention group
ACTIVE COMPARATORreceived a Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) intervention
Interventions
Patients were randomized into two equal groups of 30 participants each. One group received a Sleep Hygiene Education (SHE) intervention
30 participants had a form of Emotional Freedom Techniques (EFT) adapted for use with insomnia (EFT-I).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients suffering insomnia sleep problem
- Age equal or more than 60 years
You may not qualify if:
- Those having major physical or psychiatric ailments or being on medication affecting their sleep were excluded
- These involved those history of epilepsy, seizures, or dementia, current alcohol or substance abuse/dependence (must have \>90 days of sobriety), night shift workers, as well as those unable to complete the study questionnaires and psychological tests.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Matrouh Universitylead
- Beni-Suef Universitycollaborator
- University of Bishacollaborator
- Suez Canal Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Nursing, Matrouh University
Marsá Maţrūḩ, 51511, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This open-label randomised controlled trial study was conducted at Elabbasia Mental Hospital and Osana family wellness elderly nursing home at Maadi, Cairo
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Gerontological Nursing
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2022
First Posted
March 11, 2022
Study Start
January 3, 2021
Primary Completion
March 21, 2021
Study Completion
March 31, 2021
Last Updated
March 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share