Does Depression Impact Our Memory for Rewarding Experiences
The Role of Memory Consolidation in Negative Memory Biases in Affective Disorders
1 other identifier
observational
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
When individuals experience depression, they may find that their brain does not work in the same way that they are used to. For example, sometimes the ability to remember things that happened during the day is not so good. This might specifically impact positive memories, for example remembering having fun at the ice cream shop with some friends. This is because when individuals are depressed they sometimes can not remember positive experiences as our brains do not have the chemicals needed to store those memories. In this experiment the investigators want to see if the ability to remember positive information is negatively impacted by depression. To do so, participants will look at some images that are related to winning high vs. low rewards. Next they are tested on their memory for those images. Participants will also be asked some questions about themselves and their mental health. The investigators expect that those who are experiencing depression will be less able to remember images related to higher rewards compared to those who are not experiencing depression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 11, 2022
March 1, 2022
Same day
December 27, 2021
March 2, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Discriminability, d'
Discriminability refers to the ability of a participant to distinguish between targets, i.e., images that were presented to them, and lures, i.e., images that were not shown to them. This is calculated using the following formula: z("hit rate" )-z("false alarm rate") and will be calculated for each reward category.
immediately after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Hit Rate
immediately after the procedure
False Alarm Rate
immediately after the procedure
Criterion, C
immediately after the procedure
Other Outcomes (6)
Becks Depression Inventory BDI
Assessed at the beginning of the experiment once
Generalised Anxiety Disorder - 7 GAD
Assessed during the first part of the experiment after the BDI.
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)
Assessed during the first part of the experiment after the GAD.
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patients with depression like symptoms
Participants in this condition must indicate that they are currently suffering from a mental health illness and score at least 20 on the Becks Depression Inventory. These participants will undergo the motivate learning task and will study images associated with high and low rewards. After 24-hours participants will be tested on their memory for those images.
Healthy controls without depression like symptoms
Participants in this condition must indicate that they do not currently suffer from a mental health condition and score less than 20 on the Becks depression inventory. These participants will also undergo the motivate learning task and will study images associated with high and low rewards. After 24-hours participants will be tested on their memory for those images.
Interventions
The Motivated Learning Task is split into two parts, the learning phase, and the test phase. During the learning phase participants are presented with 72 landscape images (targets) which they must memorise. Each image which participants are shown is associated with a reward amount. During the test phase participants are shown the 72 images they saw during the learning phase, known as targets, intermixed with 72 new images they did not see during the learning phase, known as lures. Participants must decide whether the image is "old" (i.e., they saw it during the learning phase) or "new" (i.e. they did not see it during the learning phase). After they have made their old/new decision, participants rate their confidence in their decision on a 3-point scale (i.e., guess, sure, very sure).
Eligibility Criteria
All participants will be recruited online using the online work-sourcing platform Prolific (www.prolific.com). Prolific has access to participant populations who are considered healthy and those who are suffering from mental health conditions. However the website is unable to determine whether participants have depressive symptoms or not, therefore the BDI will be administered to divide participants into healthy controls and those with depressive symptoms as described previously.
You may qualify if:
- Prolific approval rating of at least 95% and have participated in at least 10 studies on Prolific.
- Country of residence: United Kingdom
- Aged between 20-45
- Education level: At least A-levels or equivalent
- Participants must use a computer or laptop to participate.
- Participants must not have participated in the study conducted to validate the images used in this experiment and in the experiment from our previous preregistrations.
- Participants must not have participated in the previous studies which used the stimuli for this task.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants who incorrectly answer the practice trials and/or the questions of either the learning or test phases of the Motivated Learning Task. (For every question, they can try twice. Only if they get it wrong twice for a given practice phase/question they are excluded.)
- Participants with reaction times below 150ms in more than 20 % of the flanker task and/or the PVT. (These are considered implausibly fast reaction times that indicate that participants did not participate in the task the way it is intended, e.g., random key presses or clicking)
- who have 20% or more lapses (reaction times above 1000 ms) on the PVT.
- Participants who incorrectly respond on \> 50% of the flanker task, indicating they did not pay attention to the task.
- Participants with a d' of 0 and below, indicating chance or worse than chance performance.
- Participants who do not complete both parts of the experiment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Central Institute of Mental Health
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68159, Germany
Related Publications (12)
Adcock RA, Thangavel A, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Knutson B, Gabrieli JD. Reward-motivated learning: mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation. Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):507-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.036.
PMID: 16675403BACKGROUNDHoddes E, Zarcone V, Smythe H, Phillips R, Dement WC. Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach. Psychophysiology. 1973 Jul;10(4):431-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00801.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 4719486BACKGROUNDRoach GD, Dawson D, Lamond N. Can a shorter psychomotor vigilance task be used as a reasonable substitute for the ten-minute psychomotor vigilance task? Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(6):1379-87. doi: 10.1080/07420520601067931.
PMID: 17190720BACKGROUNDSnaith P. Anhedonia: a neglected symptom of psychopathology. Psychol Med. 1993 Nov;23(4):957-66. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700026428.
PMID: 8134519BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDSaunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.
PMID: 8329970BACKGROUNDDillon DG, Dobbins IG, Pizzagalli DA. Weak reward source memory in depression reflects blunted activation of VTA/SN and parahippocampus. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Oct;9(10):1576-83. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst155. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
PMID: 24078019BACKGROUNDButton KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafo MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
PMID: 23571845BACKGROUNDBarr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
PMID: 24403724BACKGROUNDBates D, Kliegl R, Vasishth S, Baayen H. Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967. 2015.
BACKGROUNDBeck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory (BDI-II). Pearson; 1996.
BACKGROUNDHeisig JP, Schaeffer M. Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review. 2019 ;35(2): 258-79.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David P Morgan, PhD
Central Institute of Mental Health
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2021
First Posted
March 11, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The data will become available as soon as the findings have been published.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers will be able to access the data via the Open Science Framework if they have IRB or ethical approval to perform the proposed analyses. Those research must also sign a data use agreement to access the data.
Once the study has been published all of the anonymised individual participant data will be made available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io). The shared data will include all data that underlies the results reported in the publication and supplementary data that may not have been used but may be useful to other researchers. The data will be made available to any researcher who has access to the Open Science Framework and completes a data use agreement form and has IRB or ethical approval to carry out their proposed analyses.