NCT05276583

Brief Summary

When individuals experience depression, they may find that their brain does not work in the same way that they are used to. For example, sometimes the ability to remember things that happened during the day is not so good. This might specifically impact positive memories, for example remembering having fun at the ice cream shop with some friends. This is because when individuals are depressed they sometimes can not remember positive experiences as our brains do not have the chemicals needed to store those memories. In this experiment the investigators want to see if the ability to remember positive information is negatively impacted by depression. To do so, participants will look at some images that are related to winning high vs. low rewards. Next they are tested on their memory for those images. Participants will also be asked some questions about themselves and their mental health. The investigators expect that those who are experiencing depression will be less able to remember images related to higher rewards compared to those who are not experiencing depression.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 27, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 11, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 11, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

December 27, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Discriminability, d'

    Discriminability refers to the ability of a participant to distinguish between targets, i.e., images that were presented to them, and lures, i.e., images that were not shown to them. This is calculated using the following formula: z("hit rate" )-z("false alarm rate") and will be calculated for each reward category.

    immediately after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Hit Rate

    immediately after the procedure

  • False Alarm Rate

    immediately after the procedure

  • Criterion, C

    immediately after the procedure

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Becks Depression Inventory BDI

    Assessed at the beginning of the experiment once

  • Generalised Anxiety Disorder - 7 GAD

    Assessed during the first part of the experiment after the BDI.

  • Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)

    Assessed during the first part of the experiment after the GAD.

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Patients with depression like symptoms

Participants in this condition must indicate that they are currently suffering from a mental health illness and score at least 20 on the Becks Depression Inventory. These participants will undergo the motivate learning task and will study images associated with high and low rewards. After 24-hours participants will be tested on their memory for those images.

Behavioral: Motivated Learning Task

Healthy controls without depression like symptoms

Participants in this condition must indicate that they do not currently suffer from a mental health condition and score less than 20 on the Becks depression inventory. These participants will also undergo the motivate learning task and will study images associated with high and low rewards. After 24-hours participants will be tested on their memory for those images.

Behavioral: Motivated Learning Task

Interventions

The Motivated Learning Task is split into two parts, the learning phase, and the test phase. During the learning phase participants are presented with 72 landscape images (targets) which they must memorise. Each image which participants are shown is associated with a reward amount. During the test phase participants are shown the 72 images they saw during the learning phase, known as targets, intermixed with 72 new images they did not see during the learning phase, known as lures. Participants must decide whether the image is "old" (i.e., they saw it during the learning phase) or "new" (i.e. they did not see it during the learning phase). After they have made their old/new decision, participants rate their confidence in their decision on a 3-point scale (i.e., guess, sure, very sure).

Healthy controls without depression like symptomsPatients with depression like symptoms

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All participants will be recruited online using the online work-sourcing platform Prolific (www.prolific.com). Prolific has access to participant populations who are considered healthy and those who are suffering from mental health conditions. However the website is unable to determine whether participants have depressive symptoms or not, therefore the BDI will be administered to divide participants into healthy controls and those with depressive symptoms as described previously.

You may qualify if:

  • Prolific approval rating of at least 95% and have participated in at least 10 studies on Prolific.
  • Country of residence: United Kingdom
  • Aged between 20-45
  • Education level: At least A-levels or equivalent
  • Participants must use a computer or laptop to participate.
  • Participants must not have participated in the study conducted to validate the images used in this experiment and in the experiment from our previous preregistrations.
  • Participants must not have participated in the previous studies which used the stimuli for this task.

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who incorrectly answer the practice trials and/or the questions of either the learning or test phases of the Motivated Learning Task. (For every question, they can try twice. Only if they get it wrong twice for a given practice phase/question they are excluded.)
  • Participants with reaction times below 150ms in more than 20 % of the flanker task and/or the PVT. (These are considered implausibly fast reaction times that indicate that participants did not participate in the task the way it is intended, e.g., random key presses or clicking)
  • who have 20% or more lapses (reaction times above 1000 ms) on the PVT.
  • Participants who incorrectly respond on \> 50% of the flanker task, indicating they did not pay attention to the task.
  • Participants with a d' of 0 and below, indicating chance or worse than chance performance.
  • Participants who do not complete both parts of the experiment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Central Institute of Mental Health

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68159, Germany

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Adcock RA, Thangavel A, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Knutson B, Gabrieli JD. Reward-motivated learning: mesolimbic activation precedes memory formation. Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):507-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.036.

    PMID: 16675403BACKGROUND
  • Hoddes E, Zarcone V, Smythe H, Phillips R, Dement WC. Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach. Psychophysiology. 1973 Jul;10(4):431-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00801.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4719486BACKGROUND
  • Roach GD, Dawson D, Lamond N. Can a shorter psychomotor vigilance task be used as a reasonable substitute for the ten-minute psychomotor vigilance task? Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(6):1379-87. doi: 10.1080/07420520601067931.

    PMID: 17190720BACKGROUND
  • Snaith P. Anhedonia: a neglected symptom of psychopathology. Psychol Med. 1993 Nov;23(4):957-66. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700026428.

    PMID: 8134519BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND
  • Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.

    PMID: 8329970BACKGROUND
  • Dillon DG, Dobbins IG, Pizzagalli DA. Weak reward source memory in depression reflects blunted activation of VTA/SN and parahippocampus. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Oct;9(10):1576-83. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst155. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

    PMID: 24078019BACKGROUND
  • Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, Munafo MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

    PMID: 23571845BACKGROUND
  • Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.

    PMID: 24403724BACKGROUND
  • Bates D, Kliegl R, Vasishth S, Baayen H. Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967. 2015.

    BACKGROUND
  • Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. Beck depression inventory (BDI-II). Pearson; 1996.

    BACKGROUND
  • Heisig JP, Schaeffer M. Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review. 2019 ;35(2): 258-79.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • David P Morgan, PhD

    Central Institute of Mental Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

David P Morgan, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2021

First Posted

March 11, 2022

Study Start

May 1, 2022

Primary Completion

May 1, 2022

Study Completion

May 1, 2022

Last Updated

March 11, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Once the study has been published all of the anonymised individual participant data will be made available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io). The shared data will include all data that underlies the results reported in the publication and supplementary data that may not have been used but may be useful to other researchers. The data will be made available to any researcher who has access to the Open Science Framework and completes a data use agreement form and has IRB or ethical approval to carry out their proposed analyses.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The data will become available as soon as the findings have been published.
Access Criteria
Researchers will be able to access the data via the Open Science Framework if they have IRB or ethical approval to perform the proposed analyses. Those research must also sign a data use agreement to access the data.

Locations