Robot Rehab: AAI With Robot During Inpatient Pediatric Rehab
Robot Rehab: Animal Assisted Interactions With a Robotic Baby Harp Seal During Inpatient Pediatric Rehabilitation
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to: Aim 1: Evaluate the feasibility \[consent and refusal rates, attrition rates, length, and number of completed therapy sessions\], and acceptability \[interviews with children and guardians, overall patient and guardian satisfaction\] during inpatient physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) sessions. Hypothesis: Animal-assisted interaction (AAI) with Paro, a robotic baby harp seal, during pediatric inpatient PT/OT sessions will be feasible and acceptable. Aim 2: Assess preliminary efficacy of AAI during PT/OT sessions with Paro on behavior (anxiety and affect) and motivation to participate in rehabilitation in hospitalized children. Hypothesis: Children who use Paro will demonstrate less anxiety, more positive affect, and greater motivation to participate in therapy than those who do not use Paro. Aim 3: Test the stress, anxiety, and depression levels of parents/guardians of children who use Paro inpatient physical and occupational therapy sessions. Hypothesis: In addition, parents and guardians of children that use Paro will report less stress, anxiety, and depression compared to parents/guardians of children that do not use Paro.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 3, 2025
CompletedJanuary 21, 2026
March 1, 2025
2.8 years
February 25, 2022
January 19, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (21)
Pain: Wrong-Baker FACES pain rating scale
The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0 which represents "no hurt" to a crying face at 10 which represents "hurts worst." Based on the faces and descriptions, the patient chooses the face that best describes their level of pain.
Change from before therapy session to immediately after therapy session is completed
Anxiety: Children's Anxiety Meter-State (CAM-S)
The CAM scale is drawn to resemble a thermometer with a bulb at the bottom and horizontal lines at intervals going up to the top. The child is instructed to indicate with a line how the child feels from from the bottom of the thermometer (not worried or nervous) to the top (very worried or nervous).
Change from before therapy session to immediately after therapy session is completed.
Intervention Acceptability
Patient Satisfaction Measure: Investigator-developed Satisfaction Measure contains one item which asks the participants to rank their satisfaction with the intervention from 1-5 (not at all - very much)
Within 1 week of study completion
Hospital Acquired Infections-Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSI)
Rates of Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections (CLABSI) will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Chart review will be conducted from the first day the patient is enrolled until 1 week after study completion.
Hospital Acquired Infections-Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI)
Rates of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Chart review will be conducted from the first day the patient is enrolled until 1 week after study completion.
Hospital Acquired Infections-Enteroviruses
Rates of Enteroviruses will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Chart review will be conducted from the first day the patient is enrolled until 1 week after study completion.
Hospital Acquired Infections-Influenza
Rates Influenza will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Chart review will be conducted from the first day the patient is enrolled until 1 week after study completion.
Hospital Acquired Infections-Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms
Rates of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Chart review will be conducted from the first day the patient is enrolled until 1 week after study completion.
Hospital Acquired Infections-Surgical-Site Infections (SSI)
Surgical-Site Infections (SSI) will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Chart review will be conducted from the first day the patient is enrolled until 1 week after study completion.
Hospital Acquired InfectionsVentilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
Rates of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) will be collected from the electronic medical record.
Chart review will be conducted from the first day the patient is enrolled until 1 week after study completion.
Sedation Exposure
Sedative and analgesic medications will be abstracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) in order to calculate sedation frequency for 4 hours after each PT/OT session in which PARO was used.
4 hours after each individual session
Microbial Contamination Screening
The ATP Monitoring with SystemSURE Plus Process uses a process which monitors levels of ATP Bioluminescence The investigators will implement established cleaning protocols and then measure ATP before the PT/OT session by swabbing PARO on the following areas: head, right flipper, left flipper, bottom \[by on/off switch\], top left back area, top right back area, stomach \[underneath\].
Completed immediately after each individual session
Activity performance form
The Activity Performance Form is an investigator developed measure that assesses the length of each therapy session (in minutes), the time to the patient's first out of bed movement, as well as the number and types of range of motion exercises performed (Passive, Active assist, and Active)
Immediately after each intervention therapy sesison
Physiologic variables-Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure (systolic \& diastolic)
Change from before therapy session to immediately after therapy session is completed
Physiologic variables-Respiratory Rate
Respiratory Rate
Change from before therapy session to immediately after therapy session is completed
Physiologic variables
Oxygen Saturation
Change from before therapy session to immediately after therapy session is completed
Opinion on Pets
18-item instrument with seven-point Likert scale (1-strongly disagree to 7-strongly agreed) designed to measure the favorableness of attitudes toward pets. Minimum Score = 18; Maximum score = 126. The higher the score, the more favorable a patient feels towards pets.
Prior to the start of the first therapy session.
Parent/Guardian Stress
42-item instrument with a five-point Likert scale designed to measure stress in parents whose child has a chronic illness or requires prolonged medical monitoring. It includes four domains or subscales. Minimum Score = 42; Maximum Score = 210. Higher scores indicate higher stress.
Change from the start of the first therapy session to the end of the final therapy session.
Parent/Guardian Anxiety and Depression
Parent/Guardian anxiety and depressive symptoms as measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Two sub-scales (Anxiety \& Depression) scored separately. Minimum Score = 0; Maximum Score = 21. Higher score = higher anxiety and/or depression
Change from the start of the first therapy session to the end of the final therapy session.
Mood/Affect
The PANAS-10 is a 10-item instrument that asks the child to rate adjectives of varying mood states according to how often the child feels joyful, cheerful, happy, lively, proud, miserable, mad, afraid, scared, and sad. The item response uses a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("very slightly or none at all") to 5 ("extremely"). Minimum score = 10; Maximum score = 50. The higher the score, the better a child's mood/affect
Change from the start of the first therapy session to the end of the final therapy session.
Motivation to Participate in Therapy
19-item scale with a six-point smiley-face scale and two open-ended questions to measure motivation from a child's perspective. It has six subscales (interest/enjoyment, competence, relatedness, autonomy, value/usefulness, and effort/importance).tems in each subscale are totaled and divided by the number of items to obtain an average score per subscale. The total scores in each subscale are added to obtain and overall motivation score. Higher scores within each subscale indicate a higher level of the concept in the subscale, whereas lower scores indicate the opposite. Thus, the scores indicate differences in the quality and type of motivation for the child. In addition, a higher total score indicates greater levels of motivation, overall.
Immediately after each therapy session.
Study Arms (4)
Physical and Occupational Therapy with Paro Robot
EXPERIMENTAL10-30 minute semi-structured, prescriptive therapy sessions with Paro robot focused on the categories of 1) speech; 2) balance and endurance; 3) memory; 4) self-esteem; 5) fine motor; 6) sensory stimulation
Physical and Occupational Therapy without Paro Robot
NO INTERVENTION10-30 minute semi-structured, prescriptive therapy sessions without Paro robot focused on the categories of 1) speech; 2) balance and endurance; 3) memory; 4) self-esteem; 5) fine motor; 6) sensory stimulation
Parents/Guardians of Hospitalized Children who use Paro Robot
EXPERIMENTALParents/guardians of hospitalized children who are assigned to the following arm "Physical and Occupational Therapy with Paro Robot"
Parents/Guardians of Hospitalized Children who do not use Paro Robot
NO INTERVENTIONParents/guardians of hospitalized children who are assigned to the following arm "Physical and Occupational Therapy with out Paro Robot"
Interventions
Device: PARO therapy seal PARO, a baby harp seal, is an advanced interactive, therapeutic medical robot developed by AIST, a leading Japanese industrial automation pioneer. It allows the documented benefits of animal therapy to be administered to patients in environments such as hospitals and extended care facilities where live animals present treatment or logistical difficulties.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 5-18
- admitted to any of the five inpatient units at Children's Hospital and Medical Center, Omaha, NE
- have an available parent or guardian
- have an active consult request for PT or OT
- awake, alert, able to follow commands
- not delirious
- able to understand English
- free from significant vision or hearing deficits
- able to verbalize.
You may not qualify if:
- Have a pacemaker
- have airborne, enteric, or enhanced contact precautions
- wounds without a covering dressing or a dressing that is visibly soiled
- known adverse psychological reactions to animals
- excessive secretions via nose or mouth
- report feeling nauseated
- shows signs of acute agitation (yelling, screaming, moaning, or is otherwise inconsolable).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hosptial and Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Related Publications (13)
Fine AH. Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy: Theoretical Foundations and Guidelines for Practice. 4th ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2015
BACKGROUNDBailey T, Christenson G, Lust K. The role of an animal-assisted interaction (AAI) program as a means of reducing stress and anxiety within a college community. Oxford, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
BACKGROUNDBailey T. Animal-assisted interactions (AAI): a creative modality to support youth with depression. In: Brooke SL, Myers CE, eds. The Use of the Creative Therapies in Treating Depression. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas; 2015:269.
BACKGROUNDBurres S, Edwards NE, Beck AM, Richards E. Incorporating Pets into Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Case Study. Rehabil Nurs. 2016 Nov;41(6):336-341. doi: 10.1002/rnj.260. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
PMID: 26956570BACKGROUNDHetland B, Bailey T, Prince-Paul M. Animal Assisted Interactions to Alleviate Psychological Symptoms in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2017 Dec;19(6):516-523.
PMID: 29276432BACKGROUNDTempler D.I., Arikawa H. (2011) The Pet Attitude Scale. In: Blazina C., Boyraz G., Shen-Miller D. (eds) The Psychology of the Human-Animal Bond. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-14419-9761-6_20
BACKGROUNDStreisand R, Braniecki S, Tercyak KP, Kazak AE. Childhood illness-related parenting stress: the pediatric inventory for parents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2001 Apr-May;26(3):155-62. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/26.3.155.
PMID: 11259517BACKGROUNDSnaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety And Depression Scale. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Aug 1;1:29. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-29.
PMID: 12914662BACKGROUNDWong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs. 1988 Jan-Feb;14(1):9-17. No abstract available.
PMID: 3344163BACKGROUNDErsig AL, Kleiber C, McCarthy AM, Hanrahan K. Validation of a clinically useful measure of children's state anxiety before medical procedures. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2013 Oct;18(4):311-9. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12042. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
PMID: 24094126BACKGROUNDEbesutani C, Regan J, Smith A, Reise S, Higa-McMillan C, Chorpita BF. The 10-item positive and negative affect schedule for children, child and parent shortened versions: Application of item response theory for more efficient assessment. J of Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2012; 34(2), 191-203.
BACKGROUNDTatla SK, Jarus T, Virji-Babul N, Holsti L. The development of the Pediatric Motivation Scale for rehabilitation. Can J Occup Ther. 2015 Apr;82(2):93-105. doi: 10.1177/0008417414556884.
PMID: 26281433BACKGROUNDTracy MF, Chlan L, Savik K, Skaar DJ, Weinert C. A Novel Research Method for Determining Sedative Exposure in Critically Ill Patients. Nurs Res. 2019 Jan/Feb;68(1):73-79. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000322.
PMID: 30540694BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Breanna D Hetland, PhD
University of Nebraska
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2022
First Posted
March 11, 2022
Study Start
April 1, 2022
Primary Completion
January 3, 2025
Study Completion
January 3, 2025
Last Updated
January 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share