Effectiveness of Telepsychiatry With Randomized Waitlist Control Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures
PROMs
A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Telepsychiatry With a Randomized Waitlist Control Utilizing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
2 other identifiers
interventional
148
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The utilization of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) during in-person care allows for on-going assessment of the severity of mental illness and patient outcomes across treatment. Additionally, it provides immediate feedback on the patient's psychiatric status to both the patient and practitioner. Carilion Clinic - Psychiatry \& Behavioral Medicine ambulatory clinic implemented PROMs prior to the start of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) pandemic and continues to utilize them as part of patient care. All new patients are asked to complete an initial PROM bundle of assessments 24 hours before their initial appointment, including the Brief Adjustment Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire, Generalized Anxiety Disorder survey, US Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, and Drug Assessment Screening Test. Automatic monthly reminders to complete the assessments continue after the first visit with the clinician. Over the last 2 years, research members of Carilion Clinic Psychiatry and Virginia Tech Psychology have been actively using PROM data to assess psychiatric health outcomes before and after the outbreak of COVID-19 in the United States. Initial results indicate that patients who received care via telepsychiatry not only did not experience worsening symptoms, but showed improvements in depression, anxiety and psychological functioning. However, without a control group of untreated patients to compare, the impact of telepsychiatry plus PROMs remains unclear. A waitlist control group design would allow investigators to compare patients receiving telepsychiatry and repeated completion of PROMs (current practice) to patients referred to psychiatry, but not receiving telepsychiatry treatment or completing PROMs during the same period. In this study, investigators plan to randomize individuals on the waitlist to one of two groups to assess the influence of time alone awaiting initial psychiatric clinician assessment (no intervention) versus minimal intervention using repeated PROMs and microlearning patient education videos while awaiting initial psychiatric clinician assessment. This kind of design allows assessment for the influence of time and the type of health service contact that replicates the basics of measurement-based psychiatric services (measurement of symptomology and well-being), but with none of the benefits of psychiatric supports, interventions, and techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 18, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 26, 2024
CompletedJune 26, 2024
June 1, 2024
1.3 years
February 16, 2022
January 29, 2024
June 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Measurement of Symptomatology of Patients on Waitlist Via Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
assess symptoms of patients on waiting list to see psychiatry from their initial referral to their initial psychiatric session. Score 0-27, higher is more severe depression.
11 months
Measurement of Symptomatology of Patients on Waitlist Via Generalized Anxiety Disorder Survey (GAD-7)
Assess symptoms of patients on waiting list to see psychiatry from their initial referral to their initial psychiatric session. Score 0-21, higher is more anxious.
11 months
Measurement of Symptomatology of Patients on Waitlist Via Brief Adjustment Scale (BASE-6)
Assess symptoms of patients on waiting list to see psychiatry from their initial referral to their initial psychiatric session. Score 6-42, higher is poorer function.
11 months
Measurement of Symptomatology of Patients on Waitlist Via US Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (USAUDIT)
assess symptoms of patients on waiting list to see psychiatry from their initial referral to their initial psychiatric session. Score 0-46, higher is greater alcohol use severity.
Baseline
Measurement of Symptomatology of Patients on Waitlist Via Drug Assessment Screening Test (DAST-10)
Assess symptoms of patients on waiting list to see psychiatry from their initial referral to their initial psychiatric session. Score 0-10, higher indicates greater substance use.
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Initial PROM plus monthly PROM plus educational video
EXPERIMENTALThese patients receive usual care plus monthly PROMs and educational video(s) while on the waitlist
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONPatients will complete the initial bundle of PROMs, then no further PROMs while they remain on the waitlist
Interventions
PROMs are scales that are validated in behavioral health for tracking symptoms of depression, anxiety, and other conditions. They can be self-administered or given by a clinician. Mytonomy videos are short, educational videos about the patient's primary condition. All patients receive PROMs on entering our clinic. The difference in this intervention is those randomized to the active treatment will receive monthly PROMs and mytonomy video(s) until their appointment with the clinician. Usual care patients will only have PROMs at the intake and then at the appointment with their assigned clinician.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all patients referred and see in an academic outpatient psychiatry clinic who wish to enroll
You may not qualify if:
- patients unable to engage in measurement-based care, such as those with dementia or other cognitive disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Anita Kablinger
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014, United States
Related Publications (6)
Kalin ML, Garlow SJ, Thertus K, Peterson MJ. Rapid Implementation of Telehealth in Hospital Psychiatry in Response to COVID-19. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 1;177(7):636-637. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20040372. No abstract available.
PMID: 32605442BACKGROUNDLambert MJ, Whipple JL, Kleinstauber M. Collecting and delivering progress feedback: A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Dec;55(4):520-537. doi: 10.1037/pst0000167.
PMID: 30335463BACKGROUNDLewis CC, Boyd M, Puspitasari A, Navarro E, Howard J, Kassab H, Hoffman M, Scott K, Lyon A, Douglas S, Simon G, Kroenke K. Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 1;76(3):324-335. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3329.
PMID: 30566197BACKGROUNDTorous J, Wykes T. Opportunities From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic for Transforming Psychiatric Care With Telehealth. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 1;77(12):1205-1206. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1640. No abstract available.
PMID: 32391857BACKGROUNDAugusterfer EF, Mollica RF, Lavelle J. Leveraging Technology in Post-Disaster Settings: the Role of Digital Health/Telemental Health. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Aug 28;20(10):88. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0953-4.
PMID: 30155744RESULTDouglas S, Jensen-Doss A, Ordorica C, Comer JS. Strategies to enhance communication with telemental health measurement-based care (tMBC). Pract Innov (Wash D C). 2020 Jun;5(2):143-149. doi: 10.1037/pri0000119.
PMID: 34888414RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Limitations and Caveats
This study has several limitations. There was no control group who underwent psychiatric treatment without PROMs. PROM scores were not shared with patients in the waitlist groups, nor were they given education about what the scores meant clinically. Data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic from a single adult academic clinic, and patients were predominantly white and female, limiting the generalizability of the results to other settings or populations.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director Psychiatry Clinical Research
- Organization
- Carilion Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Virginia O'Brien, MD
Carilion Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The intervention and data collection will take place before the patient sees the psychiatry clinician. The outcomes assessor will not be involved in the patient care.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2022
First Posted
March 11, 2022
Study Start
October 18, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2023
Study Completion
January 31, 2023
Last Updated
June 26, 2024
Results First Posted
June 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share