Comparison Of A Novel Sling With A Traditional Abduction Sling After Shoulder Surgery
Randomized Trial Comparing A Novel Sling With A Traditional Abduction Sling After Shoulder Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine if the novel shoulder sling has higher patient satisfaction compared to a traditional, abduction sling with at least equivalent postoperative outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedJune 16, 2022
June 1, 2022
1.5 years
February 28, 2022
June 13, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Patient choice of type of sling to utilize from postoperative days 29-42
Categorical variable of which sling they preferred to use for the last two weeks of their 6 week postoperative immobilization period
6 weeks after surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS)\[scale 0= best to 10=worst\] utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use
Prior to surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS) \[scale 0= best to 10=worst\] utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use and satisfaction with the type of sling utilized during this time period
14 days after surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS) \[scale 0= best to 10=worst\] utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use and satisfaction with the type of sling utilized during this time point. The rationale for recording both the day 14 and day 15 SSS is to get the patient's immediate impression on the potential subjective differences between the slings within 24 hours of changing to the alternate sling.
15 days after surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS) \[scale 0= best to 10=worst\]utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use and satisfaction with the type of sling utilized during this time period
28 days after surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS) \[scale 0= best to 10=worst\] utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use and satisfaction with the type of sling utilized during this time period
6 weeks after surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS) \[scale 0= best to 10=worst\] utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use
14 weeks after surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS) \[scale 0= best to 10=worst\] utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use
6 months after surgery
Sling satisfaction survey
a novel, sling satisfaction score (SSS) \[scale 0= best to 10=worst\] utilizing a number-based visual analog scale will be utilized to assess baseline characteristics of common symptoms that have been attributed to sling use
12 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (13)
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score
Prior to surgery
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score
14 weeks after surgery
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score
6 months after surgery
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score
12 months after surgery
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation
Prior to surgery
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Initial Immobilization with the novel sling
EXPERIMENTAL20 patients will be placed in the novel sling after surgery for the first two weeks. For the second two weeks (days 15-28) they will crossover and utilize the standard abduction sling. For the final two weeks (days 29-42) they will choose their preferred sling type and use it for the remainder of six week immobilization period.
Initial Postoperative Immobilization with the standard abduction sling
EXPERIMENTAL20 patients will be placed in the traditional abduction sling after surgery for the first two weeks. For the second two weeks (days 15-28) they will crossover and utilize the novel sling. For the final two weeks (days 29-42) they will choose their preferred sling type and use it for the remainder of six week immobilization period.
Interventions
The novel sling was designed and created by the principal investigator to address these concerns of the traditional slings that are currently available for postsurgical protection and immobilization after shoulder surgery. It is anticipated that the novel sling will allow the patient to be more active and more comfortable while still providing a safe healing environment after a shoulder injury or shoulder surgery.
An abduction sling is the most common type of sling utilized to protect patients after rotator cuff surgery and total shoulder of arthroplasty and can be considered the current standard of care.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
- Dominant extremity undergoing surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing revision surgery
- Patients with a history of significant cervical spine disease, peripheral neuropathy, or concomitant wrist or elbow disorders
- Patients that do not understand English
- Patients unwilling to participate or follow up for the study protocols
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Orthopedic Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57117, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2022
First Posted
March 10, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2022
Primary Completion
September 1, 2023
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
June 16, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Currently there is not a plan to allow IPD with other researchers