Cervical Occlusion Double-level Stitch Application
COSA
Comparison of the Efficacy of Emergency Double-level and Single Cervical Cerclage in Cervical Insufficiency in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy - Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
81
1 country
7
Brief Summary
Cervical insufficiency is defined as painless dilatation of the cervix during the second trimester of pregnancy. As a result of shortening and opening of the cervix, despite the lack of uterine contractions, the fetal membranes invade into the cervical canal and then into the vagina, which results in premature rupture of the membranes and miscarriage or preterm delivery. Cervical insufficiency occurs in approximately 1% of the women. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of placing a double-level cervical cerclage in the treatment of advanced cervical insufficiency. The hypothesis assumes that the insertion of a double-level suture is associated with a reduction in the rate of deliveries \< 34 weeks of gestation in comparison to single-level suture. The study will include women with fetal membranes visible through open external os of the cervix between 16+0 and 25+6 weeks. They will be randomized to two arms - McDonald's single cervical cerclage or two-level cerclage.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 11, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 10, 2025
CompletedSeptember 30, 2025
September 1, 2025
3 years
January 19, 2022
September 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
deliveries below 34+0 weeks of gestation
number and rate of deliveries below 34+0 weeks of gestation
observation after intervention for 26 weeks of until birth
Secondary Outcomes (7)
gestational age at delivery
observation after intervention for 26 weeks of until birth
time from cerclage administration to delivery
observation after intervention for 26 weeks of until birth
fetal demise
observation after intervention for 26 weeks of until birth
neonatal outcomes
observation after intervention for 26 weeks of until birth
birth weight
observation after intervention for 26 weeks of until birth
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
cerclage procedure complications occurring within 48 hours after cerclage placement
observation after intervention for 48 hours
Study Arms (2)
Double-level cerclage
EXPERIMENTALdouble-level cervical cerclage placement with one suture above the other approximately 1 cm higher. Suture will be placed analogous to McDonald technique
Single-level cerclage
ACTIVE COMPARATORsingle-level cervical cerclage of McDonald technique
Interventions
two cervical sutures + regimen of antibiotics + indomethacin + progesterone
single cervical suture + regimen of antibiotics + indomethacin + progesterone
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- singleton pregnancy,
- gestational age 16+0 to 25+6 weeks,
- live fetus,
- cervical incompetence with fetal membranes visible through external os before 24+0 weeks of gestation,
- informed written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- preterm premature rupture of membranes,
- vaginal bleeding,
- active regular uterine contractions,
- fetal demise,
- fever,
- intrauterine infection (diagnosed in case of maternal body temperature ≥ 38°C with no alternative cause identified and at least 2 symptoms among the following appear: fetal tachycardia \> 160 bpm for 10 minutes or longer, uterine pain, purulent vaginal discharge, white blood cell count \> 15 G/L in the absence of corticosteroid treatment or increased plasma C-reactive protein \> 10 mg/L),
- known genetic defects of the fetus,
- known lethal fetal malformations,
- congenital uterine defects,
- multiple pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Educationlead
- Polish Mother Memorial Hospital Research Institutecollaborator
- Medical University of Warsawcollaborator
- Medical University of Gdanskcollaborator
- Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Polandcollaborator
- Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszczcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Department of Obstetrics, Women's Diseases and Oncological Gynecology, Nicolaus Copernicus University
Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 85-168, Poland
1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postagraduate Medical Education
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 01-004, Poland
Department of Obstetrics, Perinatology and Neonatology, Center of Postagraduate Medical Education
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 01-809, Poland
1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-015, Poland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncological Gynecology and Gynecological Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-952, Poland
Institute of Mother and Child
Warsaw, Poland
Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital - Research Institute
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 93-338, Poland
Related Publications (10)
Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Antsaklis A. Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Feb;107(2 Pt 1):221-6. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000187896.04535.e6.
PMID: 16449104RESULTStupin JH, David M, Siedentopf JP, Dudenhausen JW. Emergency cerclage versus bed rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks. A retrospective, comparative study of 161 women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jul;139(1):32-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.11.009. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
PMID: 18243484RESULTAlthuisius SM, Dekker GA, Hummel P, van Geijn HP; Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;189(4):907-10. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00718-x.
PMID: 14586323RESULTOh KJ, Romero R, Park JY, Lee J, Conde-Agudelo A, Hong JS, Yoon BH. Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;221(2):140.e1-140.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
PMID: 30928565RESULTMiller ES, Grobman WA, Fonseca L, Robinson BK. Indomethacin and antibiotics in examination-indicated cerclage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1311-1316. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000228.
PMID: 24807330RESULTWood SL, Owen J. Cerclage: Shirodkar, McDonald, and Modifications. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;59(2):302-10. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000190.
PMID: 26974218RESULTPark JM, Tuuli MG, Wong M, Carbone JF, Ismail M, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Cervical cerclage: one stitch or two? Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):477-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304831. Epub 2012 Mar 7.
PMID: 22399222RESULTGiraldo-Isaza MA, Fried GP, Hegarty SE, Suescum-Diaz MA, Cohen AW, Berghella V. Comparison of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch for transvaginal cervical cerclage for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):209.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.11.039. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
PMID: 23201330RESULTWoensdregt K, Norwitz ER, Cackovic M, Paidas MJ, Illuzzi JL. Effect of 2 stitches vs 1 stitch on the prevention of preterm birth in women with singleton pregnancies who undergo cervical cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;198(4):396.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.782. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
PMID: 18177834RESULTKosinska Kaczynska K, Rebizant B, Bednarek K, Dabrowski FA, Kajdy A, Muzyka-Placzynska K, Filipecka-Tyczka D, Uzar P, Kwiatkowski S, Torbe A, Grzesiak M, Kaczmarek P, Zyla M, Brawura-Biskupski-Samaha R. Emergency cerclage using double-level versus single-level suture in the management of cervical insufficiency (Cervical Occlusion double-level Stitch Application, COSA): study protocol for a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2023 Jun 7;13(6):e071564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071564.
PMID: 37286317DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katarzyna Kosinska Kaczynska, Prof.
Center of Postgraduate Medical Education
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna Kajdy, MD PhD
Center of Postgraduate Medical Education
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mariusz Grzesiak, Prof.
Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital - Research Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2022
First Posted
March 7, 2022
Study Start
March 11, 2022
Primary Completion
March 10, 2025
Study Completion
March 10, 2025
Last Updated
September 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data will become available after completing of recruitment and will be available for 12 months
- Access Criteria
- Data will be available od request sent to the principal researchers. All requests for information will be reviewed by the Study Officials.
IPD share with other researchers will include all IPD that underlie results in a publication