Chemical and Mechanical Angioplasty for Vasospasm (SAVEBRAIN)
SAVEBRAIN
Comparison of Two Validated Endovascular Strategies for Refractory Vasospastic Stenosis After Non-traumatic Intracranial Haemorrhage Leading to Severe Brain Hypoperfusion: Chemical Versus Chemical and Mechanical Angioplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a monocentric randomized prospective trial comparing 2 different endovascular strategies of intracranial arterial angioplasty in case of refractory intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis :
- chemical angioplasty
- chemical and mechanical angioplasty
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2024
CompletedFebruary 21, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.8 years
February 15, 2022
February 20, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in brain hypoperfusion
Brain hypoperfusion in arterial territories assessed by the delays on perfusion Time to drain (seconds) on CT and/or MR perfusion
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Change in vessel size
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
Time to next endovascular intervention for vasospastic stenosis
Number of days after the endovascular procedure until the next procedure in days, up to 4 weeks
modified Rankin Scale at 3 months
3 months after Intracranial Hemorrhage
Change in Transcranial Doppler
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
change in Brain Hypoperfusion 2
Change between day 0 and day 1 after the endovascular procedure and randomization
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Chemical angioplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORChemical angioplasty using intra-arterial Nimodipin
Chemical and Mechanical angioplasty
ACTIVE COMPARATORBalloon angioplasty for refractory intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis with a CE Marked device (Neurospeed balloon) or Adjustable remodeling mesh angioplasty for refractory intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis with a CE Marked device (Comaneci) in association with intra-arterial Nimodipin
Interventions
Angioplasty for Refractory Intracranial Arterial Vasospastic Stenosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ruptured aneurysm, AVM, or per-procedural complication etc)
- Ruptured aneurysm, AVM, intracranial arterial perforation or any bleeding lesion secured with surgical clipping or endovascular intervention.
- No contra-indication to both CTP and MRI imaging
- Subject or legal representative is able and willing to give informed consent.
- Refractory of intracranial arterial vasospastic stenosis requiring an endovascular angioplasty with a severe stenosis defined on CTA or DSA; and/or a significant hypoperfusion defined according to the mismatch profile in stroke or a MTT\>6 seconds. The volume of critically hypoperfused tissue will be based on a time to maximum of the tissue residue function (Tmax) threshold of \>6 sec using the Rapid (or equivalent) software.
You may not qualify if:
- Angioplasty by one of the two methods considered as impossible or too risky by the neurointerventionist
- Inability to obtain consent from patient or patients relatives
- Pregnant women
- Less than 18 years of age
- Need to use any other device
- Vertebro-basilar arteries will not be randomized because of the difficulty to assess the perfusion volume in this territory, but will be treated if necessary according to our local protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Erasme Hospital
Brussels, 1070, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Adrien Guenego, MD
Erasme University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2022
First Posted
March 7, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2022
Primary Completion
January 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2024
Last Updated
February 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No IPD sharing