Microneedle Pretreatment as a Strategy to Improve the Effectiveness of Topical Anesthetics Formulations
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized, crossover, double-blind, two-sessions clinical trial with 30 male volunteers was performed to access pain of local anesthesia after using a topical anesthetic associated or not with prior application of microneedles to the palatal mucosa region
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1
Started Aug 2019
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 7, 2022
CompletedMarch 21, 2022
March 1, 2022
3 months
February 23, 2022
March 4, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain sensitivity assessment by Visual Analogue Scale after the after puncture and injection of local anesthetic
Microneedles or the negative control were used to prepare the palatal mucosa to receive the topical anesthetic, followed by the insertion of the needle and injection of the local anesthetic, evaluating whether the microneedles improve the effectiveness of the topical agent with a Visual Analogic Scale. The blind investigator, evaluated the values with a rule, the left far end mean 0, for no pain at all and the right far end mean 100 for maximum pain. Therefore, a higher score means a worse outcome,
2 minutes or 5 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Microneedles
EXPERIMENTALMicroneedles is with 750μm of height in order to prepare the palatal mucosa to receive the topical anesthetic
patch flat
SHAM COMPARATORThe same device as the microneedles but without microneedles
Interventions
The topical anesthetic used in this experimental is EMLA® after the pre-treatment of the palatal mucosa
After the pre-treatment with microneedles and the use of topical anesthetic, the needle and injection of local anesthetic was inserted and pain was evaluated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Healthy male
You may not qualify if:
- Volunteers were free from cardiac, hepatic, renal, pulmonary, neurological, gastrointestinal and haematological diseases, psychiatric disorders, smokers or alcoholic.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Campinas, Brazillead
- Texas Tech Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Michelle Franz Montan Braga Leite
Piracicaba, São Paulo, 13414903, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Every volunteers has received bilateral pre-treatment with microneedles or the negative control in the palatal mucosa, in both sessions, which each session was 2 minutes of topical anesthetic or 5 minutes.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2022
First Posted
March 7, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2019
Primary Completion
October 30, 2019
Study Completion
January 30, 2020
Last Updated
March 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03