NCT05257499

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of online formative feedback and debriefing on nursing and medical students enrolled in the HBB course in comparison to traditional face-to-face feedback. The working hypothesis is that online feedback and debriefing during hands-on training sessions are as effective as face-to-face feedback and debriefing in teaching clinical skills to medical and nursing students.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
49

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 5, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 10, 2022

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 16, 2022

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 25, 2022

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 3, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

February 16, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Online debriefingIn person debriefingHelping babies breatheDebriefingSimulation training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score

    The OSCE of all participants will be videotaped without showing any identifier. Grading of the OSCE will be done by an independent instructor blinded to group assignments. OSCE is graded over 100. Grades equal of higher than 80% are considered for passing.

    One month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Student satisfaction

    One month

Study Arms (2)

On line debfriefing

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will practice the skills taught as above but in the presence of the same certified instructor who will guide them throughout all the steps of HBB using a virtual platform (Webex® or Zoom®).

Behavioral: On line debriefing

In person debriefing

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in this group will practice the skills taught in the virtual class on the neonatal mannequin. They are expected to work as a small group of 3 to 4 at a time. They will receive coaching, debriefing and feedback from a certified instructor who will conduct the traditional in-person training with face-to-face feedback and debriefing.

Interventions

Online Debriefing in the Simulation Sessions of the Helping Babies Breathe Course

On line debfriefing

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Nurses and medical students

You may not qualify if:

  • Attended resuscitation course

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

American University of Beirut

Beirut, Beyrouth, 1107 2020, Lebanon

Location

American University of Beirut

Beirut, Hamra, 1107 2020, Lebanon

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Odongkara B, Tylleskar T, Pejovic N, Achora V, Mukunya D, Ndeezi G, Tumwine JK, Nankabirwa V. Adding video-debriefing to Helping-Babies-Breathe training enhanced retention of neonatal resuscitation knowledge and skills among health workers in Uganda: a cluster randomized trial. Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1743496. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1743496.

    PMID: 32524895BACKGROUND
  • Sait MS, Siddiqui Z, Ashraf Y. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 May 2;8:317-320. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S133328. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28496377BACKGROUND
  • Mehta NB, Hull AL, Young JB, Stoller JK. Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education. Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1418-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36a07.

    PMID: 23969368BACKGROUND
  • Kfoury P, Maalouf F, Nasser F, Gulgulian T, Charafeddine L. In-Person Versus Online Training in Simulations of Helping Babies Breathe: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64677. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64677. eCollection 2024 Jul.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Atelectasis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor of Clinical Pediatrics and Neonatology, Director of the Neonatal Resuscitation Education Program

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2022

First Posted

February 25, 2022

Study Start

October 5, 2021

Primary Completion

February 10, 2022

Study Completion

March 31, 2022

Last Updated

April 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations