In-person Versus Online Debriefing in HBB
1 other identifier
interventional
49
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of online formative feedback and debriefing on nursing and medical students enrolled in the HBB course in comparison to traditional face-to-face feedback. The working hypothesis is that online feedback and debriefing during hands-on training sessions are as effective as face-to-face feedback and debriefing in teaching clinical skills to medical and nursing students.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 25, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2022
CompletedApril 3, 2025
February 1, 2022
4 months
February 16, 2022
March 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) score
The OSCE of all participants will be videotaped without showing any identifier. Grading of the OSCE will be done by an independent instructor blinded to group assignments. OSCE is graded over 100. Grades equal of higher than 80% are considered for passing.
One month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Student satisfaction
One month
Study Arms (2)
On line debfriefing
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will practice the skills taught as above but in the presence of the same certified instructor who will guide them throughout all the steps of HBB using a virtual platform (Webex® or Zoom®).
In person debriefing
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this group will practice the skills taught in the virtual class on the neonatal mannequin. They are expected to work as a small group of 3 to 4 at a time. They will receive coaching, debriefing and feedback from a certified instructor who will conduct the traditional in-person training with face-to-face feedback and debriefing.
Interventions
Online Debriefing in the Simulation Sessions of the Helping Babies Breathe Course
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nurses and medical students
You may not qualify if:
- Attended resuscitation course
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
American University of Beirut
Beirut, Beyrouth, 1107 2020, Lebanon
American University of Beirut
Beirut, Hamra, 1107 2020, Lebanon
Related Publications (4)
Odongkara B, Tylleskar T, Pejovic N, Achora V, Mukunya D, Ndeezi G, Tumwine JK, Nankabirwa V. Adding video-debriefing to Helping-Babies-Breathe training enhanced retention of neonatal resuscitation knowledge and skills among health workers in Uganda: a cluster randomized trial. Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1743496. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1743496.
PMID: 32524895BACKGROUNDSait MS, Siddiqui Z, Ashraf Y. Advances in medical education and practice: student perceptions of the flipped classroom. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 May 2;8:317-320. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S133328. eCollection 2017. No abstract available.
PMID: 28496377BACKGROUNDMehta NB, Hull AL, Young JB, Stoller JK. Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education. Acad Med. 2013 Oct;88(10):1418-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36a07.
PMID: 23969368BACKGROUNDKfoury P, Maalouf F, Nasser F, Gulgulian T, Charafeddine L. In-Person Versus Online Training in Simulations of Helping Babies Breathe: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):e64677. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64677. eCollection 2024 Jul.
PMID: 39149645DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Clinical Pediatrics and Neonatology, Director of the Neonatal Resuscitation Education Program
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2022
First Posted
February 25, 2022
Study Start
October 5, 2021
Primary Completion
February 10, 2022
Study Completion
March 31, 2022
Last Updated
April 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share