Study Stopped
The study was stopped because of logistical issues with the sites.
"Pilot Study: A Comparison of the Bouquet Speculum and the Traditional 2-Bladed Speculum"
"A Comparison of the Bouquet Speculum and the Traditional 2-Bladed Speculum"
1 other identifier
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized single-blinded clinical study will compare the typical 2-bladed plastic disposable vaginal speculum to the novel 5-petal Bouquet speculum on level of patient comfort, visibility of the cervix, and time length of the examination. The data will be collected via patient and provider questionnaires.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2022
CompletedNovember 22, 2023
November 1, 2023
7 months
February 4, 2022
November 20, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Patient comfort
Find the difference in the level of patient comfort during a vaginal speculum exam between the traditional 2-blade plastic disposable speculum and the 5-petal Bouquet speculum. Assessed with a questionnaire answered by the patient: 1. What was the level of comfort with this Pap smear compared to other speculum exams you have had? (More comfortable, Same level of comfort/discomfort, Less comfortable ) 2. Based on what you anticipated the exam was: (More comfortable, As comfortable/uncomfortable, Less comfortable) 3. On a scale from 0 to 10, what is the highest level of pain you experienced during the Pap smear/speculum exam? (10 being the worst pain you have ever experienced, and 0 being no pain) 4. Did the doctor who performed the exam ask you adjust your body position while the speculum was inserted? (Yes, No) 5. What is your estimation of how long the speculum was inserted? (0-30 seconds, 30-60 seconds, 1-2 minutes, 2-3 minutes, \>3 minutes)
Immediately after the exam
Length of time
Find the difference in the length of time that the Bouquet speculum is inserted during a Pap smear compared to the traditional 2-blade speculum. The time the speculum is inserted is recorded for every interactions.
During the exam
Ease of use
Find the difference in ease of use for the provider between the traditional 2-blade plastic disposable speculum and the 5-petal Bouquet speculum. Assessed with a questionnaire answered by the provider: 1. During the speculum exam, were the lateral walls of the cervix easily visualized upon initial visualization of the cervix? (Yes, No) 2. What is your estimate of how long the speculum was inserted? (0-30 seconds, 30-60 seconds, 1-2 minutes, 2-3 minutes, \>3 minutes) 3. While the speculum was inserted, was the patient asked to adjust body position in order to gain a better view of the cervix? (Yes, No) 4. Were special maneuvers performed in order to better visualize the cervix? (e.g. use a different size/type of speculum, apply a condom over the speculum to view the lateral walls, re-insert the speculum, etc.)? (Yes, No)
Immediately after the exam
Study Arms (2)
Traditional plastic 2-blade disposable speculum
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients assigned to this arm will be evaluated using the traditional plastic 2-blade disposable speculum
5-petal Bouquet speculum
EXPERIMENTALPatients assigned to this arm will be evaluated using the 5-petal Bouquet speculum
Interventions
Quantitative assessments of visualization of cervix, ease-of-use by the provider, and comfort of the patient
Quantitative assessments of visualization of cervix, ease-of-use by the provider, and comfort of the patient
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients that require a pelvic exam.
- years of age or older
- Having had at least one previous pelvic exam with the traditional speculum
- Consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- \- Never had a pelvic exam before
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Isain Zapatalead
Study Sites (1)
St. George OB/GYN
St. George, Utah, 84790, United States
Related Publications (1)
Bouquet JM, Chernau A, McLaughlin R, Choudhury Q. 2019. A New Vaginal Speculum and an Inexpensive Kit to Screen and Treat Dysplasia and Cancer of the Cervix. Journal of Women's Health Care. 8.470 doi: 10.35248/2167-0420.19.8.470
BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James M Small, MD
Rocky Vista University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Patients who have an indication for a speculum exam and who meet other inclusion criteria will be randomized to either receive their exam with the traditional plastic 2-blade disposable speculum or the 5-petal Bouquet speculum. After the exam, the patient and the physician will each fill out a questionnaire that will ask about patient comfort, ease of use, visibility of the cervix, and perceived time of the exam.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor in Research and Statistics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2022
First Posted
February 24, 2022
Study Start
March 21, 2022
Primary Completion
October 30, 2022
Study Completion
October 30, 2022
Last Updated
November 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11