Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Open Liver Resection Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Liver resection surgery is a common surgical procedure which is performed on patients with benign, malignant or metastatic hepatic tumor as well as for living liver donor. Liver resection surgery is usually performed through either right subcostal or inversed L-shaped incision; both approaches are associated with a significant postoperative pain which requires intensive analgesic plan to facilitate early mobilization and minimize complications. There are various lines for pain management in liver resection surgery such as systemic analgesic drugs, neuraxial blocks (e.g., thoracic epidural analgesia) and transversus abdominis plane \[TAP\] block). Systemic analgesic drugs are nearly constantly used in liver resection. However, being systemically administered, these drugs have many side effects on many organs and cannot totally eliminate postoperative pain. Thoracic epidural block is commonly associated with hypotension; furthermore, its use has other limitations such as delaying postoperative mobilization and possible hematoma and cord compression in patients with coagulopathy which is expected following liver resection. Therefore, there had been an increased interest in the use of abdominal field blocks to avoid disadvantages of neuraxial blocks and minimize the use of parenteral analgesic drugs. TAP block is one of the classic field blocks which is extensively used in laparotomies including liver resection. However, the lack of visceral pain control TAP block influences the quality of its analgesic effect in this type of patients. Nevertheless, TAP block, namely the subcostal approach, is still the recommended field block in the latest procedure-specific recommendations for pain management in liver resection as it is the only block which showed good evidence. In recent years, there has been increased interest in a newer field block, the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), due its easy performance and the possible coverage of visceral pain in addition to the somatic pain. ESPB showed promising results in liver resection surgery. ESBP was superior to TAP block in various abdominal surgeries. However, its analgesic efficacy had not been previously compared in relation to TAP in patients undergoing open liver resection surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 11, 2022
March 1, 2022
2 months
February 14, 2022
March 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
total morphine requirement in the first 24 hours
mg
0.5 hour after extubation till 24 hour after extubation
Secondary Outcomes (7)
intraoperative morphine requirement
15 minutes after block administration till 1 minutes after extubation
time to first morphine requirement
1 minute after block administration till 24 hours postoperatively
NRS
0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 18, 24 hours after leaving the operating room
Time to independent movement
0.5 hour after extubation till 24 hour after extubation
heart rate
15 minutes before induction of anesthesia, 15 minutes after induction of anesthesia, every 15 minutes intraoperatively and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 18, 24 hours postoperatively
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
subcostal transversus abdominis plane block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORsubcostal transversus abdominis plane block
erector spinae plane block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORerector spinae plane block
Interventions
Patient in TAP block group will receive oblique subcostal TAP while in supine position using a linear 6-13 MHz ultrasound transducer. The operator will place the ultrasound probe obliquely on the upper abdominal wall along the subcostal margin near the xiphisternum of the sternum in the midline of the abdomen. The landmarks, which included the rectus abdominis muscle and underlying transversus abdominis muscle, will be identified near the costal margin and xyphoid. The probe will be then moved laterally until the aponeurosis of the external, internal oblique, and transversus abdominis are seen, and then the probe will be moved further laterally until the transversus abdominis muscle is identified. The operator will direct the needle toward the transversus abdominis, and the local anesthetic solution will be injected after negative aspiration between the rectus abdominis and transversus abdominis muscles along the subcostal line (in-plane superomedial to inferolateral)
Patients in ESPB group will be turned to the lateral position and receive ESPB at the level of the 7th thoracic (T7) transverse process using a linear 6-13 MHz ultrasound transducer. The transducer will be positioned vertically 3 cm to the side of the midline to visualize the muscles of the back, the transverse process, and the pleura between the two transverse processes. Then, a 22G 10-mm needle will be introduced in the cranial-caudal direction toward the transverse process (T7) using the in-plane method till the needle tip crosses all the muscles. The tip of needle should be in the plane between the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle. After ensuring negative aspiration, the local anesthetic solution will be injected below the muscle. the procedure will be repeated on the other side
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult patients (\>18 years),
- ASA-physical status I-III
- undergoing open liver resection surgery for either primary/metastatic hepatic malignancy, biliary tract malignancy, or benign hepatic tumor
You may not qualify if:
- history of allergy to any of the study drugs,
- a body mass index (BMI) \<18 or ≥ 35 kg/m2,
- coagulopathy (INR \>1.5 and/or platelet count \<70000/µL),
- local infection,
- history of chronic pain or regular opioid use;
- inability to comprehend the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS),
- liver resection combined with a second surgical procedure, laparoscopic resections,
- pregnant or lactating women.
- Patients with complicated procedures
- those needing postoperative ventilation will be excluded from the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kasr Alaini Hospital
Cairo, 11562, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Mostafa M, Mousa MS, Hasanin A, Arafa AS, Raafat H, Ragab AS. Erector spinae plane block versus subcostal transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open liver resection surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 Feb;42(1):101161. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101161. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
PMID: 36154912DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2022
First Posted
February 23, 2022
Study Start
March 1, 2022
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
data can be available from the principle investigator upon reasonable request