NCT05252182

Brief Summary

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has been shown to improve outcomes in an inpatient setting; however, there is currently no compelling evidence of benefit for CGA interventions within the Emergency Department (ED). This study aims to explore the clinical and process outcomes of older adults who receive interdisciplinary ED-CGA over a period of six months after their initial ED attendance.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
133

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 12, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 5, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 22, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

February 12, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 20, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

older adultsfrailtyemergency departmentcomprehensive geriatric assessment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of hospital admission from the ED index attendance.

    Number of participants who are admitted to hospital following their index ED attendance

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Incidence of functional decline (including functional decline at discharge from hospital among the cohort admitted from the ED).

    30 days and 6 months

  • Patient satisfaction with the ED index attendance

    30-day follow-up

  • Number of unscheduled ED re-attendances

    30 days and 6 months

  • Number of unscheduled hospital admissions

    30 days and 6 months

  • Nursing home admission

    30 days and 6 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Older adults aged ≥ 65 years who screen positive for risk of adverse outcomes following ED attendance.

You may qualify if:

  • Aged ≥ 65 years;
  • Identification of Seniors at Risk score of ≥ 2;
  • Manchester Triage System category of 2 to 5;
  • Presenting with a medical complaint.

You may not qualify if:

  • Older adults who are deemed not to have capacity to provide informed consent;
  • Older adults who present to the ED outside of the operational working hours (Monday-Friday, 08:00-16:00) of the interdisciplinary ED-CGA team;
  • Older adults presenting with acute cardiac and/or neurological pathology;
  • Older adults presenting with injuries that require surgical intervention;
  • Older adults presenting with high illness acuity, which necessitates treatment in the resuscitation room for the duration of their ED stay.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Limerick

Limerick, Munster, Ireland

Location

Related Publications (15)

  • MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14258950BACKGROUND
  • McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S, Trepanier S, Verdon J, Ardman O. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: the ISAR screening tool. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Oct;47(10):1229-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb05204.x.

    PMID: 10522957BACKGROUND
  • Mackway-Jones K ed: Emergency triage. London: BMJ Publishing Group. 1997.

    BACKGROUND
  • Marshall GN, Hays RD: The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18). Santa Monica, CA: Rand; 1994.

    BACKGROUND
  • Conroy SP, Turpin S. New horizons: urgent care for older people with frailty. Age Ageing. 2016 Sep;45(5):577-84. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw135. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

    PMID: 27496917BACKGROUND
  • Morley C, Unwin M, Peterson GM, Stankovich J, Kinsman L. Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions. PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30161242BACKGROUND
  • Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

    PMID: 23395245BACKGROUND
  • Lowthian JA, McGinnes RA, Brand CA, Barker AL, Cameron PA. Discharging older patients from the emergency department effectively: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):761-70. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv102. Epub 2015 Aug 10.

    PMID: 26265674BACKGROUND
  • Sanders AB, Witzke D, Jones JS, et al.: Principles of care and application of the geriatric emergency care model. In: Sanders AB, ed. Emergency Care of the Elder Person. St Louis: Beverly Cracom Publications, 1996; 59-93.

    BACKGROUND
  • Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwee D, Habbig AK, Scafoglieri A, Jansen B, Bautmans I; Gerontopole Brussels Study group. Frailty and the Prediction of Negative Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Dec 1;17(12):1163.e1-1163.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.010.

    PMID: 27886869BACKGROUND
  • Ellis G, Gardner M, Tsiachristas A, Langhorne P, Burke O, Harwood RH, Conroy SP, Kircher T, Somme D, Saltvedt I, Wald H, O'Neill D, Robinson D, Shepperd S. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD006211. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3.

    PMID: 28898390BACKGROUND
  • Conroy SP, Stevens T, Parker SG, Gladman JR. A systematic review of comprehensive geriatric assessment to improve outcomes for frail older people being rapidly discharged from acute hospital: 'interface geriatrics'. Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):436-43. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr060. Epub 2011 May 26.

    PMID: 21616954BACKGROUND
  • Conroy SP, Ansari K, Williams M, Laithwaite E, Teasdale B, Dawson J, Mason S, Banerjee J. A controlled evaluation of comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department: the 'Emergency Frailty Unit'. Age Ageing. 2014 Jan;43(1):109-14. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft087. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

    PMID: 23880143BACKGROUND
  • Harding S. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department. Age Ageing. 2020 Oct 23;49(6):936-938. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa059.

    PMID: 32315396BACKGROUND
  • O'Shaughnessy I, Robinson K, O'Connor M, Conneely M, Steed F, Ryan D, Carey L, Shchetkovsky D, Shanahan E, Leahy A, Quinn C, Sheikhi A, Galvin R. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the emergency department: A protocol for a prospective cohort study. HRB Open Res. 2022 Sep 14;5:26. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13504.2. eCollection 2022.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

FrailtyEmergencies

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDisease Attributes

Study Officials

  • Íde O'Shaughnessy, MSc

    University of Limerick

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2022

First Posted

February 23, 2022

Study Start

February 1, 2022

Primary Completion

August 5, 2022

Study Completion

February 10, 2023

Last Updated

June 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Locations