Comparison of NoaScope to the Conventional Stethoscope for Auscultation of Heart and Lung Sounds
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Assessing non-inferiority of a newly developed electronic stethoscope NoaScope in comparison with the conventional 3M Littmann stethoscope
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2022
CompletedApril 6, 2023
April 1, 2023
1 month
December 24, 2021
April 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Correctly identified abnormal heart and lung sounds by doctors using two stethoscopes: NoaScope and 3M™️ Littmann®️ Classic III.
Each patient will receive two auscultation examinations: one with NoaScope and another with 3M™️ Littmann®️ Classic III. The investigators will determine the clinical feasibility and non-inferiority of NoaScope to the FDA-approved 3M™️ Littmann®️ Classic III from auscultation findings (heart and lungs) by doctors (holding varied levels of clinical expertise). Doctors will examine each patient using two stethoscopes: NoaScope and 3M™️ Littmann®️ Classic III. The investigators will also measure inter and intra observer agreement by the Kappa index with the help of a questionnaire. Kappa values \< 0.8 means weak to moderate level of agreement and Kappa values between 0.8 - 1.0 would mean strong level of agreement.
1 month
The measurement of sound quality in a clinical setting by means of an MOS scale on a questionnaire.
The investigators will measure sound quality on a mean opinion score scale with values ranging form 1 (bad) to 5 (excellent).
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Difference in performance between subgroups of doctors based on clinical experience.
1 month
Study Arms (1)
Auscultation with a newly developed electronic stethoscope: NoaScope
EXPERIMENTALIdentification of abnormal heart and lung sounds in study participants
Interventions
Smart digital stethoscope
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ages: 18 years or older (male and female)
- Hospital admitted or Out Patient Department
- Written consent provided
You may not qualify if:
- Age \<18
- ICU admitted
- Written consent not provided
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Innova Smart Technologies (Pvt.) Ltdlead
- Rehman Medical Institute - RMIcollaborator
- NOABIO LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rehman Medical Institute - RMI
Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, 25000, Pakistan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2021
First Posted
February 23, 2022
Study Start
December 22, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2022
Study Completion
February 10, 2022
Last Updated
April 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share