One Year Clinical Evaluation of Conservative Versus Conventional Ceramic Onlays
1 other identifier
interventional
22
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
the aim of present study is to evaluate clinically the fracture liability , marginal adaptation , and patient satisfaction of conservative versus conventional ceramic Onlays use e-max press to restore defective restored molar with old restoration or caries. with one or more cusp defect
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 27, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 12, 2023
CompletedFebruary 22, 2022
February 1, 2022
11 months
January 9, 2022
February 10, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
evaluation of fracture resistance
fracture resistance of restorations postoperatively: assessment of the restoration for fracture resistance , by using Measuring device Modified United States Public Health Service (MUSPHS) parameters were used to compare the restorations at baseline and final examination use explorer Measuring unit .Discrete(scores) 1. alpha no evidence of fracture 2. bravo evidence of fracture
one year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
evaluation of marginal adaptation
1 year
evaluation of patient satisfaction to the onlay restoration through questioning the patient about pain during eating , acceptability ,sensitivity
1 year
Study Arms (2)
onlays conservative
EXPERIMENTALconservative onlays preparation with partial cusp coverage only defective cusps
onlays conventional
ACTIVE COMPARATORonlays preparation design conventional as all cusps covered with shoulder finish line preparation
Interventions
all coverage of cusps as overlay with shoulder finish line
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All subjects are required to be:
- From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2- Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations 3- Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures 4- Patients with teeth problems indicated for onlay restoration:
- Decayed teeth
- Teeth restored with defected filling restorations
You may not qualify if:
- Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years
- Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
- Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients
- Pregnant women
- Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
- Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
- Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Eman Hussein
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lereture must university
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2022
First Posted
February 22, 2022
Study Start
February 27, 2022
Primary Completion
January 15, 2023
Study Completion
August 12, 2023
Last Updated
February 22, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02