Impaired Risk Awareness During Intoxication in DUI Offenders
2 other identifiers
interventional
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to test the efficacy of experiential-based training to increase DUI offenders' perceptions or risk associated with alcohol use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 2, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 12, 2026
CompletedMay 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
3.1 years
February 5, 2022
February 3, 2026
May 11, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Mean Number of Alcohol Binges
Alcohol consumption will be assessed at monthly intervals from baseline to follow up and will be measured using a timeline follow back assessment. Participants will self-report data on number of days when the participant demonstrates binge drinking (5+ drinks per day for men; 4+ drinks per day for women).
Baseline, 30 and 60 days post intervention
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) at Baseline
Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.
Baseline
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.
Post Intervention (up to 14 days)
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.
30 Days Post-Intervention
Mean Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) Post Intervention
Change in tonic alcohol cravings over the past week will be assessed using the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale (PACS) which is a five-item self-report indicated with strong psychometrics. 'Frequency' is the frequency of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Strong' is the intensity of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Time' is the duration of craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Resist' is the inability to resist craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. 'Crave' is overall craving with a score on a Likert scale ranging from 0 to 6 with higher scores meaning worse craving. PACS uses a 0-6 point Likert scale for each item where a higher number for each of the five items indicates more cravings. Total scores range from 0 to 30.
60 Days Post-Intervention
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) Scale
The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) is a 37-item self-report measure of 8 dimensions of self-perceived interoceptive ability. The dimensions are: Notice (awareness of uncomfortable, comfortable, or neutral body sensations), Not Distracted (tendency not to ignore or distract oneself from sensations of pain or discomfort), Not Worried (tendency not to worry or experience emotional distress with sensations of pain or discomfort), Attention Regulation (ability to sustain and control attention to body sensations), Emotion (awareness of the connection between body sensations and emotional states), Self-Regulation (ability to regulate distress by attention to body sensations), Body (tendency to actively "listen" to the body for insight), and Trust (experience of one's body as safe and trustworthy). The minimum score for each of the eight dimensions is 0 while the maximum score is 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes/greater interoception.
Baseline (Intervention Session)
Mean Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) Scale
The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness Ver. 2 (MAIA-2) is a 37-item self-report measure of 8 dimensions of self-perceived interoceptive ability. The dimensions are: Notice (awareness of uncomfortable, comfortable, or neutral body sensations), Not Distracted (tendency not to ignore or distract oneself from sensations of pain or discomfort), Not Worried (tendency not to worry or experience emotional distress with sensations of pain or discomfort), Attention Regulation (ability to sustain and control attention to body sensations), Emotion (awareness of the connection between body sensations and emotional states), Self-Regulation (ability to regulate distress by attention to body sensations), Body (tendency to actively "listen" to the body for insight), and Trust (experience of one's body as safe and trustworthy). The minimum score for each of the eight dimensions is 0 while the maximum score is 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes/greater interoception.
Post Intervention (up to 14 days)
Study Arms (2)
Intoxicated risk awareness training session
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will complete an intoxicated risk awareness training session in which they receive a controlled alcohol dose with structured feedback and training to accurately appraise the impairing effects of alcohol and estimate their blood alcohol concentration (BAC).
Alcohol exposure only
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants assigned to the alcohol-exposure-only condition undergo the same alcohol dose exposures over the session but receive a general body scan and do not receive feedback concerning BAC or performance.
Interventions
Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be trained to accurately estimate their BAC using the Body Scan Exercise with BAC feedback.
This training element targets the driver's self-efficacy by increasing their awareness of the behavioral impairing effects of alcohol that are experienced at BACs at and even below the legal limit (50-80 mg/dl).
Subjects will receive 0.65 g/kg alcohol to yield a peak BAC of 85 mg/dl (0.085%). They will be given a general Body Scan Exercise with no feedback.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Valid driver's license for at least 5 years
- Drive regularly (weekly basis)
You may not qualify if:
- History of physical or psychiatric disease
- Pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
- Substance use disorder (other than nicotine or caffeine use)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40506, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Mark Fillmore
- Organization
- University of Kentucky
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Fillmore, PhD
University of Kentucky
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2022
First Posted
February 21, 2022
Study Start
February 2, 2022
Primary Completion
March 1, 2025
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
May 12, 2026
Results First Posted
May 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03