NCT05243576

Brief Summary

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) remains as one of the effective rehabilitation modalities for addressing recovery of neuromuscular function after a spinal cord injury (SCI). To achieve optimal effects, the NMES interventions that involve or promote voluntary efforts from SCI participants are preferred. However, these interventions are limited by the fact that the active monitoring of voluntary effort, particularly at the stimulated muscle level is unattainable. The objective of the proposed study is to develop SMARTq (Stimulated Muscle Assessment in Real-Time). This novel system will provide a quasi real-time assessment of intrinsic neuromuscular responses of a stimulated muscle during NMES. Specifically, the proposed system will consist of our novel algorithms interfaced with the EMG data acquisition hardware to process the EMG data recorded from a stimulated muscle in real-time during NMES. The term 'quasi' is used to account for the processing delay of approximately 1 to 2 seconds that may potentially occur. The proposed system will be developed and validated using the data collected from the able-bodied (AB) as well as individuals with incomplete SCI (iSCI). The applicability of the system will be evaluated on individuals with complete SCI (cSCI). Our central hypothesis is that the real-time tracking of neuromuscular responses during a train of NMES will provide valuable information on inherent neuromuscular changes, volitional participation, and neuromuscular recovery. The significance of the proposed study is that, if successful, it will deliver a highly novel system which can allow researchers and clinicians to - 1) evaluate the direct electrophysiological effects of varied combination of NMES on a stimulated muscle in real-time; 2) quantify, track and manipulate the levels of voluntary efforts or volitional drive 'on-fly' during NMES for extracting optimal benefits; 3) track the neuromuscular recovery of the stimulated muscle, particularly for cSCI populations, when any functional changes have not been observed yet; and 4) directly observe the neuromuscular fatigue derived from the electrophysiological data at the stimulated muscle. These are highly significant opportunities that can allow the clinicians and researchers to transform the current as well as future NMES interventions into highly effective training modalities as each intervention will be operated at an individual's neuromuscular level.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
15

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2019

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 9, 2019

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2022

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 17, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 17, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

February 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 7, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Neuromuscular Electrical StimulationElectromyographyEMG-feedbackSpinal cord injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Electromyography (EMG) correlates

    EMG RMS amplitude,

    A single timepoint

  • Torque

    Torque recorded at knee joint using biodex dynamometer

    A single timepoint

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • RMSE

    single timepoint

Study Arms (3)

incomplete SCI

1\) Be motor incomplete; 2) Be AIS classified as C or D; 3) have a neurological level of injury from C6 - T6; 4) Have LEMS score \> 10; 5) Have Modified Ashworth Scale ≤ 3 for spasticity. Additional - 1) Be able to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions; 3) Have been diagnosed with a spinal cord injury by a physician.

complete SCI

1\) Be chronic (≥ 1-year post injury); 2) AIS classified as A or B motor-complete; Additional - 1) Be able to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions; 3) Have been diagnosed with a spinal cord injury by a physician.

Able-bodied

1\) Be able and willing to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

There will be five participants in each of the three study groups: able-bodied (AB), incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), and complete spinal cord injury (cSCI). All participants will be between the ages of 18 and 60 years old. Individuals will be recruited through the Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation System, which includes 3 hospitals and 75 outpatient clinics.

You may qualify if:

  • SCI generic criteria - 1) Be able to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions; 3) Have been diagnosed with a spinal cord injury by a physician.
  • Individuals with complete SCI. 1) Be chronic (≥ 1-year post injury); 2) AIS classified as A or B motor-complete;
  • Individuals with incomplete SCI. 1) Be motor incomplete; 2) Be AIS classified as C or D; 3) have a neurological level of injury from C6 - T6; 4) Have LEMS score \> 10; 5) Have Modified Ashworth Scale ≤ 3 for spasticity.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kessler Foundation

West Orange, New Jersey, 07052, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Pilkar R, Yarossi M, Ramanujam A, Rajagopalan V, Bayram MB, Mitchell M, Canton S, Forrest G. Application of Empirical Mode Decomposition Combined With Notch Filtering for Interpretation of Surface Electromyograms During Functional Electrical Stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Aug;25(8):1268-1277. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2624763. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

    PMID: 27834646BACKGROUND
  • Momeni K, Pilkar R, Ravi M, Forrest GF. Isolating Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Artifact to Identify Motor Response during Walking. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:6569-6572. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630099.

    PMID: 34892614BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Research Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2022

First Posted

February 17, 2022

Study Start

December 9, 2019

Primary Completion

December 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

February 17, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Locations