Effect of Low-volume (1L) vs Intermediate-volume (2L) Bowel Preparation on Cost-effectiveness and Quality of Life
RESULT
1 other identifier
interventional
509
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy is paramount for optimal diagnostic accuracy and safety. However, the need for high volumes to clean the colon often makes it difficult for patients to adhere to. Therefore, new low volume bowel preparation fluids have been developed. Little is known on the impact of these low volume bowel preparation fluids (1L), compared to intermediate-volume (2L) laxatives on quality of life (QoL) and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to provide further evidence on the presumed positive effect of ultra-low volume bowel preparation on patients' QoL and cost-effectiveness, in addition to its already demonstrated positive effect on bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. This multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in four hospitals in the Netherlands. Secure web-based questionnaires will be used before starting bowel preparation (baseline, t=0) and within 1 week (t=1) after colonoscopy, to assess the impact of bowel preparation on QoL and explore costs and productivity loss for cost-effectiveness analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 16, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 16, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2023
CompletedNovember 21, 2024
November 1, 2024
10 months
September 30, 2021
November 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Boston Bowel preparation scale score (total and per segment)
Level of bowel cleanliness achieved with the bowel preparation used. Segmental scores range from 0 to 3, in which 0 is worst and 3 is best. A segmental score of 2 or more is considered adequate for colonoscopy.
during colonoscopy procedure
Proportion of adequately prepared patients per type of bowel preparation
Level of bowel cleanliness achieved with the bowel preparation used. Segmental boston bowel preparation scores range from 0 to 3, in which 0 is worst and 3 is best. A segmental score of 2 or more is considered adequate for colonoscopy.
during colonoscopy procedure
Secondary Outcomes (9)
absolute score of SF-36 (short-form 36)
within 1 week after colonoscopy, questionnaire 2/2
absolute score EQ-5D-5L
within 1 week after colonoscopy, questionnaire 2/2
Correlation of clinical parameters and tolerability to Quality of life scores
questionnaire 2/2, within 1 week after colonoscopy
Subgroup differences for absolute scores on SF-36 for colonoscopy indication and prior experience with bowel preparation
questionnaire 2/2, within 1 week after colonoscopy
Subgroup differences in costs for colonoscopy indication and prior experience with bowel preparation
questionnaire 2/2, within 1 week after colonoscopy
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Pleinvue
EXPERIMENTALa 1L poly ethylene glycol PEG solution with added ascorbate (Pleinvue, Norgine, active ingredients PEG 3350, Sodium ascorbate, Sodium sulfate, Ascorbic acid, Sodium chloride, Potassium chlorid)
Moviprep
ACTIVE COMPARATORa 2L PEG solution with added ascorbate (Moviprep, Norgine, active ingredients Macrogol 3350, Sodium Sulphate Anhydrous, Sodium chloride, Potassium chloride, Ascorbic acid, Sodium ascorbate)
Interventions
a recently developed 1 liter bowel preparation fluid that is often used in clinical practice. Patients will receive a split dose protocol, low-residue diet 2 days before colonoscopy, and clear liquid diet 1 day before colonoscopy.
a 2 liter widely established 2 liter bowel preparation fluid that is commonly used in clinical practice. Patients will receive a split dose protocol, low-residue diet 2 days before colonoscopy, and clear liquid diet 1 day before colonoscopy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Planned elective colonoscopy for surveillance or diagnostic indications
You may not qualify if:
- Therapeutic colonoscopy (e.g. endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR)
- History of (sub) total colectomy
- Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
- Inpatient status
- Indication for an intensified bowel preparation regime
- Emergency colonoscopy
- Limited Dutch language skills
- Dementia
- Visual impairment
- Commonly accepted contra-indications for non-iso osmotic bowel preparation and ascorbate:
- Glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
- (sub)ileus
- Bowel obstruction or perforation
- Acute abdomen
- Gastroparesis
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Radboud university medical center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 30, 2021
First Posted
February 16, 2022
Study Start
May 16, 2022
Primary Completion
February 27, 2023
Study Completion
March 2, 2023
Last Updated
November 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 15y
- Access Criteria
- The dataset used during this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request
The dataset used during this study is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request