Multicentric, Randomized Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Centhaquine in Patients With ARDS
A Multicentric, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Centhaquine as an Adjuvant to the Standard of Care in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with a diffuse, inflammatory form of lung injury, causing pulmonary infiltration and respiratory failure leading to poor oxygenation. It is a rapidly progressive form of respiratory failure and accounts for approximately 10% of admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) and has a high mortality (40%) in severe cases. Globally, approximately 3 million ARDS cases are reported each year, with around 200,000 cases seen in the United States. The etiology of ARDS could be pulmonary or extra-pulmonary. Patients with ARDS have symptoms like difficulty in breathing, shortness of breath, and cyanosis, and they may require assisted breathing/ventilatory support/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. About 25% of ARDS patients need mechanical ventilation to support breathing; however, a ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is known to further exacerbate ARDS in many of them. In recent decades, numerous efforts have been made to develop therapies for treating/managing ARDS. Unfortunately, they have been largely unsuccessful or inconclusive, and at present, no effective pharmacological therapy for ARDS is available. Hence, development of better therapeutics for ARDS is an unmet need. Centhaquine is a first-in-class resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock approved for marketing in India. Centhaquine has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit, and swine models of hemorrhagic shock. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647). Results from multicentric, randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled clinical phase II (CTRI/2017/03/008184) and phase III (CTRI/2019/01/017196) studies conducted in India indicate that centhaquine is a novel, first-in-class, highly effective resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock. A total of 155 patients with hypovolemic shock have been studied in the combined phase II and III trials, while a multicentric phase IV study (NCT05956418) in 400 patients with hypovolemic shock is currently being conducted in India. The outcomes of the completed trials indicate that centhaquine is safe and reduces mortality significantly (P=0.0271) compared to standard treatment of hypovolemic shock. In the phase II and III studies, ARDS and MODS were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Centhaquine provided hemodynamic stability and significantly reduced ARDS and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in patients enrolled in these trials, which suggests that centhaquine has potential beyond treating hypovolemic shock and could be useful for ARDS treatment. Centhaquine is likely to provide hemodynamic stability, improve tissue oxygenation, reduce pulmonary edema, reduce ARDS score, and reduce MODS in patients with ARDS.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
April 14, 2026
April 1, 2026
6 months
February 14, 2022
April 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥200 mmHg or relative increase by 50 mmHg from baseline
The study's primary objective is to determine the clinical effect of centhaquine in patients with moderate to severe ARDS.
3 days
Secondary Outcomes (12)
28-day all-cause mortality
28 days
60-day all-cause mortality
60 days
Time to clinical improvement on WHO 8-point ordinal scale
60 days
Hospital free days
28 days
ICU free days
28 days
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Normal saline
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo (Dose: equal volume saline) + Standard of care
Centhaquine
ACTIVE COMPARATORCenthaquine (Dose: 0.01 mg/kg) + Standard of care
Interventions
Placebo (Dose: equal volume saline) + Standard of care
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult male or female aged 18 years or older
- Hospitalized in the ICU diagnosed with moderate to severe ARDS having a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of \< 200 mmHg or the SPO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤ 235( if SPO2 ≤ 97 %) with PEEP ≥ 5 cm H20 include the patient receiving invasive /non-invasive ventilation (NIV/CPAP).
- The first dose of the study drug should be administered within 48 hours of confirming moderate to severe ARDS.
- Requires vasopressor support
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Receiving or expected to receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
- Confirmed pregnancy
- Breast feeding
- Participating in another interventional study
- Requires or having the renal replacement therapy
- Hepatic failure (Child-Pugh scores B and C)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pharmazz, Inc.lead
Related Publications (12)
Gulati A, Choudhuri R, Gupta A, Singh S, Ali SKN, Sidhu GK, Haque PD, Rahate P, Bothra AR, Singh GP, Maheshwari S, Jeswani D, Haveri S, Agarwal A, Agrawal NR. A Multicentric, Randomized, Controlled Phase III Study of Centhaquine (Lyfaquin(R)) as a Resuscitative Agent in Hypovolemic Shock Patients. Drugs. 2021 Jun;81(9):1079-1100. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01547-5. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
PMID: 34061314BACKGROUNDRanjan AK, Zhang Z, Briyal S, Gulati A. Centhaquine Restores Renal Blood Flow and Protects Tissue Damage After Hemorrhagic Shock and Renal Ischemia. Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 3;12:616253. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.616253. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34012389BACKGROUNDGulati A, Jain D, Agrawal NR, Rahate P, Choudhuri R, Das S, Dhibar DP, Prabhu M, Haveri S, Agarwal R, Lavhale MS. Resuscitative Effect of Centhaquine (Lyfaquin(R)) in Hypovolemic Shock Patients: A Randomized, Multicentric, Controlled Trial. Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):3223-3265. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01760-4. Epub 2021 May 10.
PMID: 33970455BACKGROUNDKontouli Z, Staikou C, Iacovidou N, Mamais I, Kouskouni E, Papalois A, Papapanagiotou P, Gulati A, Chalkias A, Xanthos T. Resuscitation with centhaquin and 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 improves survival in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock: a randomized experimental study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec;45(6):1077-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0980-1. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
PMID: 30006694BACKGROUNDBriyal S, Gandhakwala R, Khan M, Lavhale MS, Gulati A. Alterations in endothelin receptors following hemorrhage and resuscitation by centhaquin. Physiol Res. 2018 Jun 27;67(Suppl 1):S199-S214. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933856.
PMID: 29947540BACKGROUNDPapalexopoulou K, Chalkias A, Pliatsika P, Papalois A, Papapanagiotou P, Papadopoulos G, Arnaoutoglou E, Petrou A, Gulati A, Xanthos T. Centhaquin Effects in a Swine Model of Ventricular Fibrillation: Centhaquin and Cardiac Arrest. Heart Lung Circ. 2017 Aug;26(8):856-863. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
PMID: 28385449BACKGROUNDO'Donnell JN, O'Donnell EP, Kumar EJ, Lavhale MS, Andurkar SV, Gulati A, Scheetz MH. Pharmacokinetics of centhaquin citrate in a dog model. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016 Jun;68(6):803-9. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12554. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
PMID: 27109141BACKGROUNDO'Donnell JN, Gulati A, Lavhale MS, Sharma SS, Patel AJ, Rhodes NJ, Scheetz MH. Pharmacokinetics of centhaquin citrate in a rat model. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016 Jan;68(1):56-62. doi: 10.1111/jphp.12498. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
PMID: 26725913BACKGROUNDPapapanagiotou P, Xanthos T, Gulati A, Chalkias A, Papalois A, Kontouli Z, Alegakis A, Iacovidou N. Centhaquin improves survival in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res. 2016 Jan;200(1):227-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.056. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
PMID: 26216751BACKGROUNDGulati A, Zhang Z, Murphy A, Lavhale MS. Efficacy of centhaquin as a small volume resuscitative agent in severely hemorrhaged rats. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;31(9):1315-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.05.032. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
PMID: 23871440BACKGROUNDLavhale MS, Havalad S, Gulati A. Resuscitative effect of centhaquin after hemorrhagic shock in rats. J Surg Res. 2013 Jan;179(1):115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.08.042. Epub 2012 Sep 2.
PMID: 22964270BACKGROUNDGulati A, Lavhale MS, Garcia DJ, Havalad S. Centhaquin improves resuscitative effect of hypertonic saline in hemorrhaged rats. J Surg Res. 2012 Nov;178(1):415-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
PMID: 22487389BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2022
First Posted
February 15, 2022
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share