NCT05240534

Brief Summary

Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are costly and pervasive among older adults. MCCs account for 90% of Medicare spending, and 65% of Medicare beneficiaries have 3 or more chronic conditions; 23% have 5 or more. MCCs are often addressed in primary care, where time pressures force a focus on medication and lab results rather than self-management skills. Patients often struggle with treatment adherence and the emotional and physical burdens of self-management and health tracking. Chronic conditions reduce quality of life (QOL) and increase loneliness, which exacerbate those conditions. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether a voice-based platform is better for delivering an electronic health intervention to older adults than a text/typing-based platform. We have an evidence-based electronic health intervention (Elder Tree, ET) that has been shown to improve quality of life, physical and socio-emotional health outcomes for older adults with multiple chronic conditions when delivered via a text/typing-based system. The current project would test whether such patients would benefit even more if ET were delivered via a voice-based system (vs. the text-based system) because they would use it more consistently. ET is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
502

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
12mo left

Started Apr 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress80%
Apr 2022Apr 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 4, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 15, 2022

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 29, 2022

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

June 11, 2025

Status Verified

June 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

February 4, 2022

Last Update Submit

June 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Voice-activated "smart" technologyOlder adults

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Change in functional health as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.

    Participant reported measure of overall health and level of physical disability. There are 4 questions with a possible score of 4-16. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in pain interference as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.

    Participant reported measure of pain interference, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in pain intensity as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.

    Participant reported measure of pain intensity, this is a single question, with a possible score of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in fatigue as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.

    Participant reported measure of fatigue, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in sleep as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.

    Participant reported measure of sleep disturbance, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in anxiety as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.

    Participant reported measure of anxiety, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in depression as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.

    Participant reported measure of depression, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Change in overall ElderTree use across the 12-month intervention

    up to 12 months

  • Change in healthcare use (primary care, specialist, urgent care, emergency room visits, and 30-day readmissions

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in health distress

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in function and disability

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • Change in well-being

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Survey scores

    Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months

  • ElderTree usefulness

    6, 12, 18 months

Study Arms (2)

Control group (ET-Text)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants will receive ElderTree on a laptop.

Behavioral: ET-Text (Laptop)

Experimental group (ET-Voice)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive ElderTree on a smart system.

Behavioral: ET-Voice (Smart System)

Interventions

ElderTree (ET) is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS). ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type. Like all CHESS systems, ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support. ET-Text arm will access ET on Laptop.

Control group (ET-Text)

ElderTree (ET) is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS). ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type. Like all CHESS systems, ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support. ET-Voice arm will access ET on a smart speaker. Voice-activated devices can potentially be easy to use, even by those with limited dexterity or computer experience.

Experimental group (ET-Voice)

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be ≥60 years old;
  • Have medical record diagnoses of at least 5 chronic conditions of which at least 3 must come from the following: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, prediabetes or diabetes, or depression;
  • Be willing to share medical record data about healthcare use (30-day hospital readmissions and ER, urgent care, primary care, and specialty care visits);
  • Allow researchers to share information with the patient's primary care provider

You may not qualify if:

  • Require an interpreter
  • Report no current psychotic disorder that would prevent participation
  • Have no acute medical problem requiring immediate hospitalization
  • Not report impairments preventing use of a computer or tablet (e.g. blind, deaf)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Wisconsin

Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Gustafson DH Sr, Mares ML, Johnston DC, Curtin JJ, Pe-Romashko K, Landucci G. Comparison of Smart Display Versus Laptop Platforms for an eHealth Intervention to Improve Functional Health for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 3;14:e64449. doi: 10.2196/64449.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Chronic Conditions

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • David H Gustafson, PhD

    University of Wisconsin, Madison

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 4, 2022

First Posted

February 15, 2022

Study Start

April 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

June 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations