ElderTree Via a Voice Activated Device for Managing Chronic Health Conditions (NHLBI)
Using Smart Displays to Implement Evidence-Based eHealth System for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions (NHLBI)
5 other identifiers
interventional
502
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are costly and pervasive among older adults. MCCs account for 90% of Medicare spending, and 65% of Medicare beneficiaries have 3 or more chronic conditions; 23% have 5 or more. MCCs are often addressed in primary care, where time pressures force a focus on medication and lab results rather than self-management skills. Patients often struggle with treatment adherence and the emotional and physical burdens of self-management and health tracking. Chronic conditions reduce quality of life (QOL) and increase loneliness, which exacerbate those conditions. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate whether a voice-based platform is better for delivering an electronic health intervention to older adults than a text/typing-based platform. We have an evidence-based electronic health intervention (Elder Tree, ET) that has been shown to improve quality of life, physical and socio-emotional health outcomes for older adults with multiple chronic conditions when delivered via a text/typing-based system. The current project would test whether such patients would benefit even more if ET were delivered via a voice-based system (vs. the text-based system) because they would use it more consistently. ET is an existing intervention providing tools, motivation, and support on a computer platform to help older adults manage their health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 4, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 29, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
June 11, 2025
June 1, 2025
5 years
February 4, 2022
June 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change in functional health as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Participant reported measure of overall health and level of physical disability. There are 4 questions with a possible score of 4-16. Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in pain interference as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Participant reported measure of pain interference, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in pain intensity as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Participant reported measure of pain intensity, this is a single question, with a possible score of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in fatigue as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Participant reported measure of fatigue, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in sleep as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Participant reported measure of sleep disturbance, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in anxiety as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Participant reported measure of anxiety, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in depression as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 v2.1.
Participant reported measure of depression, there are 4 questions, with a possible score of 4-20. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Change in overall ElderTree use across the 12-month intervention
up to 12 months
Change in healthcare use (primary care, specialist, urgent care, emergency room visits, and 30-day readmissions
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in health distress
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in function and disability
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
Change in well-being
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Change in NIH Toolbox Loneliness Survey scores
Baseline, 6, 12, 18 months
ElderTree usefulness
6, 12, 18 months
Study Arms (2)
Control group (ET-Text)
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive ElderTree on a laptop.
Experimental group (ET-Voice)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive ElderTree on a smart system.
Interventions
ElderTree (ET) is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS). ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type. Like all CHESS systems, ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support. ET-Text arm will access ET on Laptop.
ElderTree (ET) is based on the extensively tested Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS). ET is a "walled garden" free of ads, with design features based on older users' feedback as well as best-practice principles such as uncluttered screens and large type. Like all CHESS systems, ET uses computers to deliver key elements of successful interventions: long duration, ongoing outreach, prompts, monitoring, cognitive reframing, action planning, problem solving, self-tailoring, and peer support. ET-Voice arm will access ET on a smart speaker. Voice-activated devices can potentially be easy to use, even by those with limited dexterity or computer experience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be ≥60 years old;
- Have medical record diagnoses of at least 5 chronic conditions of which at least 3 must come from the following: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, prediabetes or diabetes, or depression;
- Be willing to share medical record data about healthcare use (30-day hospital readmissions and ER, urgent care, primary care, and specialty care visits);
- Allow researchers to share information with the patient's primary care provider
You may not qualify if:
- Require an interpreter
- Report no current psychotic disorder that would prevent participation
- Have no acute medical problem requiring immediate hospitalization
- Not report impairments preventing use of a computer or tablet (e.g. blind, deaf)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gustafson DH Sr, Mares ML, Johnston DC, Curtin JJ, Pe-Romashko K, Landucci G. Comparison of Smart Display Versus Laptop Platforms for an eHealth Intervention to Improve Functional Health for Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Apr 3;14:e64449. doi: 10.2196/64449.
PMID: 40080672DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David H Gustafson, PhD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 4, 2022
First Posted
February 15, 2022
Study Start
April 29, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
June 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share