Pre-Implementation Enhancement Strategy To Improve Teachers' Intention to Implement Evidence-Based Practices
SC-PIES
A Theory-Informed Pre-Implementation Enhancement Strategy Targeting Mechanisms and Outcomes of Implementation: A Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
43
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Background: As the most common setting where youth access behavioral health services, the education sector frequently employs training and follow-up consultation as cornerstone implementation strategies to promote the uptake and use of evidence-based practices (EBPs), which are often insufficient to produce desired implementation outcomes (e.g., intervention fidelity) and changes in youth behavioral health outcomes (e.g., reduced externalizing behaviors). There is a need for theoretically-informed pre-implementation enhancement strategies (PIES) that increase the yield of training and follow-up consultation. Specifically, social-cognitive theory explicates principles to inform the design of strategy content and specific mechanisms of behavior change, such as intentions to implement (ITI), to target via a PIES that increase provider to more active implementation strategies. Methods: This triple-blind randomized controlled trial preliminarily examined the efficacy of a pragmatic PIES (SC-PIES) to improve the implementation of universal EBPs in the education sector. Participants were randomly assigned to the treatment (PIES) or active control condition (meeting with administrators). The investigators assessed participants' ITI, intervention fidelity, and youth behavioral health outcome before, immediately after, and six-week following treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 22, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 20, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 10, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2022
CompletedFebruary 15, 2022
February 1, 2022
10 months
January 10, 2022
February 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from Baseline Teachers' Intentions to Implement (ITI) at 3 Days
The Modified Intentions to Use Scale was adopted to assess the change in teachers' intentions to implement from baseline to immediate post-test. The scale is originally developed from research on practitioners' intention to adhere to measurement-based care and is consistent with the recommendations for assessing behavioral intentions based on the theory of planned behavior (Godin \& Kok, 1996). The scale consists of five items on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from "greatly disagree" to "greatly agree". The items were modified to specifically assess teachers' intentions to implement EBPs. The scale showed acceptable reliability and validity in prior research.
Three days following the baseline test of teachers' intentions to implement
Change from Baseline Teachers' Intervention Fidelity at 6 weeks.
A team of trained professionals, who were blinded to the random assignment results, conducted structured observations to assess the intervention fidelity, which is operationalized in this study as "adherence to core components of the classroom management practices". The data collection took place at pre-test and 6-week follow-up to allow enough time to detect and compare changes in intervention fidelity. First, during core instructional times, trained observers observed two occasions at pre-test and 6-week follow-up to code the presence or absence of the core components of the evidence-based practices. Immediately following the observations, these observers completed a fidelity rating rubric, which was created by operationalizing three core components of each PCBMs such that observers could reliably observe and rate them. The average of the observation coding and the rubric scores represents each teacher's fidelity.
Six weeks following the baseline test of teachers' intervention fidelity
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline Students' Academic Engaged Time (AET) at 6 weeks
Six weeks following the baseline test of students' AET
Study Arms (2)
Theory-informed pre-implementation enhancement strategies (SC-PIES)
EXPERIMENTALThe SC-PIES was delivered to teachers as a one-hour professional development session immediately before receiving specific training about evidence-based student behavioral management practices and subsequent follow-up consultation. The content of SC-PIES was grounded in three social-cognitive principles: (a) growth mindset, (b) saying-is-believing, and (c) commitment and consistency.
Active control
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants in the active control condition will meet with school administrators to talk about their work irrelevant to SC-PIES or student behaviors. The meeting lasted for the same duration as the SC-PIES at the same time as those in the treatment condition.
Interventions
The SC-PIES was delivered to teachers as a one-hour professional development session immediately before receiving specific training about evidence-based student behavioral management practices and follow-up consultation. SC-PIES content was grounded in three social-cognitive principles: (a) growth mindset, (b) saying-is-believing, and (c) commitment and consistency.
Participants in the active control condition will meet with school administrators to talk about their work irrelevant to SC-PIES or student behaviors. The meeting lasted for the same duration as the SC-PIES at the same time as those in the treatment condition.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Teachers who have no prior training about Proactive Classroom Behavioral Management Strategies (PCBM) targeting youth behaviors in an urban school district.
- Teachers who have no prior experience in implementing Proactive Classroom Behavioral Management Strategies (PCBM) targeting youth behaviors in an urban school district.
You may not qualify if:
- Teachers who have attended more than three training sessions about Proactive Classroom Behavioral Management Strategies (PCBM) targeting youth behaviors in an urban school district.
- Teachers who have more than one month of experience in implementing Proactive Classroom Behavioral Management Strategies (PCBM) targeting youth behaviors in an urban school district.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Iowalead
- University of Washingtoncollaborator
- University of Minnesotacollaborator
Related Publications (3)
Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996 Nov-Dec;11(2):87-98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87.
PMID: 10163601BACKGROUNDSanetti LM, Kratochwill TR. Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review. 2009 Dec 1;38(4):445.
BACKGROUNDZhang Y, Cook CR, Azad GF, Larson M, Merle JL, Thayer J, Pauls A, Lyon AR. A Pre-Implementation Enhancement Strategy to Increase the Yield of Training and Consultation for School-Based Behavioral Preventive Practices: a Triple-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Prev Sci. 2023 Apr;24(3):552-566. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01464-3. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
PMID: 36367633DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yanchen Zhang, PhD
University of Iowa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All personnel involved in this study were masked, including the participating teachers, investigators, trainers who deliver the SC-PIES or meeting, and staff who collected the outcome data.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 10, 2022
First Posted
February 15, 2022
Study Start
July 22, 2016
Primary Completion
May 20, 2017
Study Completion
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
February 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- From December 1st, 2021 with no ending date
- Access Criteria
- Public upon request to the principle investigator
The de-identified datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the Open Science Framework repository, \[osf.io/d5t4m/\].