Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) vs Holmium MOSES for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) Versus Holmium MOSES Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate, places pressure on the urethra and causes urination and bladder problems. Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard treatment in most centres for BPH. However, morbidity after TURP is high, especially bleeding requiring blood transfusion and late postoperative bleeding. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a safe and effective procedure which has demonstrated comparable results to TURP. HOLEP also offers patients the alternative of being treated endoscopically with minimal blood loss, short catheterization time, and decreased hospital stay. The main reason HoLEP has yet to become the new standard for treatment of symptomatic BPH is due the complexity of this procedure as compared to TURP. Furthermore, the HoLEP can be used with the MOSESTM system, a system that allows for more efficiency and ease of use of the HoLEP. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) enucleation of the prostate is an emerging technology for endoscopic prostate enucleation that is notable for its high wavelength and pulsed mode of action. Recent studies have shown TFL enucleation of the prostate to be a safe and highly efficacious treatment modality for the management of large volume (\> 80 cm3) glands in BPH. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden the investigators' understanding of the TFL and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations. The aim of this study is to whether Thulium Fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) and Holmium laser enucleation using MOSES™ (M-HoLEP) have comparable length of hospital stay, as well as intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 16, 2024
August 1, 2024
3 years
January 7, 2022
August 15, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Length of stay in the hospital
within 6 hours
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Incidence of bleeding
Intra-Op
Incidence of blood transfusion
Intra-Op
Operative time
Intra-Op
International Prostate Symptom Score
1,3,6,12 months post-op
Quality of Life (QOL) as scored on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
1,3,6,12 months post-op
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Thulium Fibre Laser (TFL)
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to this arm will undergo treatment using the TFL.
MOSES Holmium Laser
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to this arm will undergo treatment using the MOSES Holmium laser.
Interventions
Participants will undergo treatment using the MOSES Holmium laser.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males over 50 years of age at the time of enrollment
- Referred to urology for refractory LUTS or urinary retention secondary to BPH
- Failed medical (non-surgical) treatment
- Prostate size on preoperative TRUS of≥80 ml
- IPSS \>15 and QOL score ≥3 and Qmax \<15 ml/sec
- Written informed consent to participate in the study
- Ability to comply with the requirements of the study procedures
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgical treatment for BPH
- History of prostate cancer
- Prostate size \< 80 mL
- History of urethral stenosis or its management
- Known or suspected neurogenic bladder
- Participants with active urinary tract infection until appropriately treated
- Participants with preexisting conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the conduct of the study
- Participants who lack the capacity, or cannot speak English, in order to provide free and informed written consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 6V4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hazem Elmansy, MD
Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Central Study Contacts
Hazem Elmansy, MD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Urologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2022
First Posted
February 15, 2022
Study Start
April 20, 2022
Primary Completion
April 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share