NCT05238571

Brief Summary

Groin hernia repair is accompanied by persistent severe pain in 2-4% of the patients significantly restraining psychophysical functions. Re-surgery with meshectomy and selective neurectomy may improve the pain condition, compared to non-surgical alternatives. In the current study, the primary objective was to examine and describe the underlying pathophysiological perturbations by quantitative somatosensory testing before and after re-surgery.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2009

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 24, 2009

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 19, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 19, 2015

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 3, 2022

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 14, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

November 28, 2022

Status Verified

November 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5.9 years

First QC Date

February 3, 2022

Last Update Submit

November 21, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

groin hernia repairchronic post-surgical painpain thresholdspatient reported outcome measuresreoperationsensory thresholds

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Thermal thresholds

    Warmth detection threshold (WDT), cool detection threshold, heat pain threshold (HPT) and cold pain threshold (CPT) are made by a computerized contact thermode (Thermotest, Somedic AB, Sweden) with an active thermal surface of 12.5 cm\^2 (2.5 x 5.0 cm\^2). The thresholds are determined from a baseline temperature of 32°C with a ramp rate of + 1°C/s. Cut-offs for heat and cold are 50°C and 5°C, respectively. The assessments are made in triplicate and the mean values are used in the statistical analyses.

    3-6 months

  • Pressure algometry

    Deep-tissue pain sensitivity is assessed using a hand-held pressure algometer with a neoprene-coated tip of area 1.0 cm2 (Somedic AB, Sweden), as previously described. The algometer is applied perpendicularly to the skin with a pressure rate of 30 kPa/s. The study subject is told to report the pressure pain threshold (PPT) by activating the button device when pain is perceived. The cut-off limit is 350 kPa. Testing is done in triplicate and the average value is used in the statistical analyses.

    3-6 months

  • Suprathreshold heat stimulation

    A short tonic heat stimulus (heating area 12.5 cm\^2; ramp rate: 1°C/s, plateau: 47°C, 5 s; STH) is delivered in order to evaluate the suprathreshold heat pain perception (NRS).

    3-6 months

  • Temporal summation

    Temporal summation test, i.e., the perception in response to repetitive (0.3 to 3 Hz) mechanical stimulation \[i.e., wind-up like pain: WUP\], indicates presence of central sensitization. The repetitive 1 Hz stimuli for 60 s are either dynamically delivered by a brush or statically delivered by a polyamide filament (one nominal rank below TPT). The study subjects are told to report the level of pain (NRS) every 15 s-1 during the stimulation. Signs of aftersensations are followed 60 s after discontinuation of the stimulation, and the intensity of discomfort or pain is rated by NRS.

    3-6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Activity Assessment Scale (AAS)

    3-6 months

  • Pain intensity scores (NRS)

    3-6 months

Interventions

Re-surgeryPROCEDURE

Re-surgery with meshectomy and selective neurectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with persistent severe pain (activity-related or maximal pain intensity \> 7 NRS-scores \[numeric pain rating scale 0-10\]) following unilateral, uncomplicated, open groin hernia repair.

You may not qualify if:

  • All that contradicts the above.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Neuroscience Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, DENMARK

Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Bande D, Molto L, Pereira JA, Montes A. Chronic pain after groin hernia repair: pain characteristics and impact on quality of life. BMC Surg. 2020 Jul 6;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00805-9.

    PMID: 32631293BACKGROUND
  • Chapman CR, Vierck CJ. The Transition of Acute Postoperative Pain to Chronic Pain: An Integrative Overview of Research on Mechanisms. J Pain. 2017 Apr;18(4):359.e1-359.e38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

    PMID: 27908839BACKGROUND
  • Campanelli G, Bruni PG, Morlacchi A, Cavalli M. Chronic Pain after Inguinal Hernia Repair. In: Campanelli G, editor. Inguinal Hernia Surgery. Milano: Springer Milan; 2017. p. 157-68.

    BACKGROUND
  • Nikkolo C, Kirsimagi U, Vaasna T, Murruste M, Suumann J, Seepter H, Lepner U. Prospective study evaluating the impact of severity of chronic pain on quality of life after inguinal hernioplasty. Hernia. 2017 Apr;21(2):199-205. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1569-4. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

    PMID: 28025741BACKGROUND
  • HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

    PMID: 29330835BACKGROUND
  • Jorgensen SG, Oberg S, Rosenberg J. Treatment of longstanding groin pain: a systematic review. Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1035-1044. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01919-7. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

    PMID: 30820781BACKGROUND
  • Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Management of chronic pain after hernia repair. J Pain Res. 2018 Apr 5;11:675-681. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S127820. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29670394BACKGROUND
  • Jensen EK, Ringsted TK, Bischoff JM, Petersen MA, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Werner MU. A national center for persistent severe pain after groin hernia repair: Five-year prospective data. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(33):e16600. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016600.

    PMID: 31415351BACKGROUND
  • Werner MU. Management of persistent postsurgical inguinal pain. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Jun;399(5):559-69. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1211-9. Epub 2014 May 23.

    PMID: 24849039BACKGROUND
  • Bischoff JM, Enghuus C, Werner MU, Kehlet H. Long-term follow-up after mesh removal and selective neurectomy for persistent inguinal postherniorrhaphy pain. Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):339-45. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1073-z. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

    PMID: 23494661BACKGROUND
  • Aasvang E, Kehlet H. Surgical management of chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2005 Jul;92(7):795-801. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5103.

    PMID: 15962258BACKGROUND
  • Aasvang EK, Kehlet H. The effect of mesh removal and selective neurectomy on persistent postherniotomy pain. Ann Surg. 2009 Feb;249(2):327-34. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818eec49.

    PMID: 19212190BACKGROUND
  • Linderoth G, Kehlet H, Aasvang EK, Werner MU. Neurophysiological characterization of persistent pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2011 Oct;15(5):521-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0815-z. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

    PMID: 21479588BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, MD, DMSci

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2022

First Posted

February 14, 2022

Study Start

April 24, 2009

Primary Completion

March 19, 2015

Study Completion

March 19, 2015

Last Updated

November 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data will be made available as a supplement to the published scientific article.

Locations