Feasibility of the Adapted H-GRASP Feedback Program in the Chronic Phase Post Stroke.
The Feasibility of the Adapted H-GRASP Feedback Program for Perceived and Daily Life UL Activity in Patients With Good Observed But Low Perceived Activity in the Chronic Phase Post Stroke: a Pilot Study.
2 other identifiers
interventional
19
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In a recent cross-sectional study, it was shown that people with a good observed upper limb (UL) motor function but low perceived UL activity show a reduced daily-life UL activity. The investigators will now investigate the feasibility of a phone-monitored home exercise and feedback program for the UL following stroke and the preliminary effects on the perceived UL activity and actual daily-life UL activity for participants with good observed UL motor function but low perceived UL activity in the chronic phase post-stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_1 stroke
Started Jan 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 14, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 7, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 25, 2023
CompletedJuly 3, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.4 years
January 14, 2022
June 30, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
Recruitment rate
% of individuals who were eligible and agreed to participate
45 days (post-intervention)
Retention rate
% of participants who completed the intervention
45 days (post-intervention)
Adherence to the intervention protocol
% of participants who achieved 12 hours of average weekly exercise
45 days (post-intervention)
Safety
\# of participants with increased pain while performing exercises as measured by visual analogue scale
45 days (post-intervention)
Activity ratio
Contribution to the activity of one upper limb (UL) versus the other: hours of activity of the affected divided by the unaffected UL
Day 1 (enrolment)
Activity ratio
Contribution to the activity of one upper limb (UL) versus the other: hours of activity of the affected divided by the unaffected UL
Day 17 (baseline)
Activity ratio
Contribution to the activity of one upper limb (UL) versus the other: hours of activity of the affected divided by the unaffected UL
45 days (post-intervention)
Hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0 (SIS-Hand)
Perceived activity of the affected UL. Minimum 0 - maximum 100; higher scores mean better outcome.
Day 1 (enrolment)
Hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0 (SIS-Hand)
Perceived activity of the affected UL. Minimum 0 - maximum 100; higher scores mean better outcome.
Day 17 (baseline)
Hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0 (SIS-Hand)
Perceived activity of the affected UL. Minimum 0 - maximum 100; higher scores mean better outcome.
45 days (post-intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Fugl-Meyer motor assessment - upper extremity (FMA-UE)
Day 1 (enrolment), day 17 (baseline), 45 days (post-intervention)
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Day 17 (baseline), 45 days (post-intervention)
Motor Activity Log - 14 Item Version Amount Of Use (MAL-14 AOU)
Day 17 (baseline), 45 days (post-intervention)
Motor Activity Log - 14 Item Version Quality Of Movement (MAL-14 QOM)
Day 17 (baseline), 45 days (post-intervention)
Erasmus modified Nottingham Sensory Assessment (Em-NSA)
Day 17 (baseline), 45 days (post-intervention)
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (7)
Demographics
Day 1 (enrolment)
Stroke event data
Day 1 (enrolment)
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Day 1 (enrolment)
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
AH-GRASP feedback intervention group
EXPERIMENTALAll study participants will receive the AH-GRASP feedback intervention.
Interventions
Combination of the Home-Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program with in home accelerometer-based feedback
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Voluntary written informed consent of the participant has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
- First-ever unilateral, supratentorial stroke, as defined by the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association
- Minimum six months after stroke
- Living in the community
- ≥18 years old
- Good observed UL motor function but low perceived UL activity. Good observed UL motor function is defined as a score \>50/66 on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE). Low perceived UL activity is defined as a score ≤75/100 on the hand subscale of the Stroke Impact Scale version 3.0 (SIS-Hand).
You may not qualify if:
- Other neurological condition than stroke
- Musculoskeletal disorder that affects UL use
- No informed consent
- Participation in an interventional Study with an investigational medicinal product (IMP) or device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KU Leuvenlead
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvencollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Private physiotherapy practices
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Geert Verheyden, Professor
KU Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 14, 2022
First Posted
February 7, 2022
Study Start
January 31, 2022
Primary Completion
June 25, 2023
Study Completion
June 25, 2023
Last Updated
July 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share