Effects of Mepivacaine on the Neurological Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction
MEPI-AVC
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepivacaine on the Neurological Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction
2 other identifiers
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A patient, suffering from cortical blindness after a bi-occipital infarction 1 year earlier, regained near-normal vision in the right visual hemifield a few minutes after subcutaneous administration of mepivacaine. The effect was maintained for several days, and was repeated with each injection of mepivacaine. This clinical improvement is associated with functional changes in the peri-lesional areas on resting-state functional MRI. The investigator team hypothesizes that in some patients with chronic neurological symptoms of stroke, the investigator team will observe a favorable response to subcutaneous mepivacaine injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Jun 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 22, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 22, 2024
CompletedJanuary 26, 2024
January 1, 2024
2 years
January 24, 2022
January 24, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
improvement of clinical scores
The response is defined as an improvement 1h (+/- 30min) after injection, compared to the evaluation before mepivacaine injection, on at least one of the clinical scores specific to the symptoms: * language : decrease of at least 4 points on the ART scale (rated from 0 to 26) , or increase of 20% of the number of images correctly named on a standardized battery (DO80, rated from 0 to 80). The rate of 20% corresponds to an effect considered clinically significant, without any "clinically significant minimal change" published to date. * motor skills : increase of at least 4 points on the Fugl-Meyer scale (rated from 0 to 60) corresponding to the "clinically significant minimal change" in the re-education studies * visual field : 20% reduction of a scotoma evaluated in automated static perimetry of Humphrey by the number of deficit areas compared to the total number of areas evaluated (n=43). The rate of 20% corresponds to an effect considered clinically significant
1 Day
Secondary Outcomes (11)
language-related symptoms
1 Day
ART scale
1 Day
spontaneous language test
1 Day
Fugl-Meyer scale
1Day
Timed up and go test
1Day
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Mepivacaine arm
EXPERIMENTALmepivacaine injection
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ischemic stroke more than 30 days old
- Age between 18 and 85 years old
- At least one deficit among:
- motor deficit: score \< 56 on the Fugl-Meyer scale
- aphasia: score ≥4 on the Aphasia Rapid Test,
- presence of a clinically observable visual scotoma
- Having given their written consent
- Be affiliated with a social security scheme, Universal Medical Coverage (CMU) or any equivalent scheme
You may not qualify if:
- Hypersensitivity to amide-bonded local anesthetics.
- Atrioventricular conduction disorders requiring permanent electro-systolic training not yet performed.
- Epilepsy not controlled by treatment.
- Porphyritic subjects.
- Patients with a motor deficit (but no aphasia or scotomas) in whom there is spasticity leading to a major reduction in joint amplitude in passive motion
- Minor patients, under curatorship or guardianship, under legal protection, deprived of liberty, pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Pathologies involving the vital prognosis or compromising follow-up during the study period
- Patient undergoing local amine anesthesia in the 7 days preceding V1.
- Patients currently treated with no anti-arrhythmics such as tocainide, aprindine and mexiletine
- Patients with a contraindication to MRI (ferro-magnetic surgical clips, eye implants, metallic foreign body intraocular or in the nervous system, implants or metallic objects likely to contain the radiofrequency field, cochlear implants, cerebral or cardiac pacemaker , implantable cardiac defibrillators)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital Pitié Salpetrière
Paris, 75013, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2022
First Posted
February 3, 2022
Study Start
June 22, 2022
Primary Completion
June 22, 2024
Study Completion
June 22, 2024
Last Updated
January 26, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01