Gatekeeper for Soiling and Gas Incontinence
Gatekeeper™ Prostheses Implants for Patients With Gas Incontinence and Soiling
1 other identifier
observational
13
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Faecal incontinence has a broad spectrum of symptoms. Some patients only suffer commonly considered mild symptoms: gas incontinence and soiling, but patients' quality of life is significantly impaired. Although several treatments for faecal incontinence are available, this subgroup of patients are difficult to treat, and no therapeutic alternative has been clearly defined. The aim of this study is to evaluate Gatekeeper™ treatment for this subgroup of patients with faecal incontinence, not studied before. Consecutive case series single-centre study. Patients with mainly soiling and/or gas incontinence were treated with polyacrylonitrile prostheses
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2014
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 3, 2022
CompletedFebruary 3, 2022
February 1, 2022
1.8 years
December 24, 2021
February 2, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in the number of gas incontinence and soiling episodes
Each patient completes a three-week continence diary specifically recording gas incontinence and soiling episodes at baseline and before every follow-up visit.
6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Changes in incontinence symptoms
Evaluation of incontinence symptoms with the St. Mark's Incontinence Score. Score from 0 to 24, where 0 means "complete continence" and 24 means "severe fecal incontinence"
6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Patient's Subjective Perception
Changes in patient subjective evaluation using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Score from 0 to 10, where 0 means "no problem" and 10 means "severe problem and alteration of my quality of life"
6, 12 and 24 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Changes in prostheses location
baseline and one month after surgery
Differences in anal pressures
baseline and three months after surgery
Interventions
Six polyacrylonitrile prostheses (THD Gatekeeper™ Delivery System, THD SpA, Correggio, Italy) were implanted under 3D-EUS control through a 5mm perianal incision at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 o'clock in lithotomy position, and located in the upper-middle intersphincteric space of the anal canal, using a specifically designed system.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients' selection was based on clinical history, physical examination, preoperative 3D-endoanal ultrasound (EUS) and a continence diary recorded for 21 days. Patients with previous history of chronic diarrhoea were evaluated by the gastroenterology team and if needed, fibre supplementation or other medical treatment was used to obtain a Bristol score of 3-4 before entering the study
You may qualify if:
- patients older than 18 years old
- with at least 6 months of GI and/or soiling
- non-responding to conservative treatment and biofeedback.
You may not qualify if:
- complete solid and liquid FI
- common Bristol score \> 4
- malignant diseases
- chronic diarrhoea
- inflammatory bowel disease
- acute anorectal disease
- rectal prolapse
- neurological disease,
- obstructive defecation syndrome
- low anterior resection syndrome,
- previous pelvic radiation,
- any anaesthetic contraindication
- St. Mark's score \> 12
- external anal sphincter lesion \> 30º.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Chief of General and Digestive Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2021
First Posted
February 3, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2015
Study Completion
December 1, 2015
Last Updated
February 3, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share