Retrospective Analysis of Balloon Expandable Covered Stenting in the Common Femoral Artery
BEST-CFA
1 other identifier
observational
24
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of balloon expandable covered stenting of access complications, stenoses or pseudoaneurysms of the common femoral access.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2023
CompletedNovember 21, 2023
February 1, 2023
13.6 years
January 18, 2022
November 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Primary patency rate
Number of patent common femoral arteries at one year
1 year
Reintervention rate
Number of reinterventions on the treated vessels
1 year
Amputation rate
Number of amputations at the side of the treated common femoral artery
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Restenosis rate
1 year
Walking disturbance rate
1 year
Eligibility Criteria
Patients undergoing either transcathether aortic valve repair (TAVR), endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) via percutaneous femoral access resulting in access site complication, or patients who undergo endovascular therapy of common femoral artery disease, managed by balloon-expandable covered stent(s).
You may qualify if:
- over 18 years of age
- intervention from the left or right common femoral artery
- access complication treated by balloon expandable covered stent(s) or common femoral artery disease treated by balloon-expandable covered stent(s)
You may not qualify if:
- none
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
University of Szeged, Albert Szent-Györgyi Health Center, Second Department of Medicine and Cardiology Centre
Szeged, Csongrád-Csanád, 6725, Hungary
Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center
Budapest, 1096, Hungary
Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
Budapest, 1122, Hungary
Related Publications (11)
Cox T, Blair L, Huntington C, Lincourt A, Sing R, Heniford BT. Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures. Surg Technol Int. 2015 Nov;27:32-44.
PMID: 26680377BACKGROUNDHeger T, Strauss S, Blessing E, Andrassy M, Erbel C, Muller OJ, Chorianopoulos E, Pleger S, Leuschner F, Korosoglou G, Bekeredjian R, Katus HA, Vogel B. Short and long-term results after endovascular management of vascular complications during transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Acta Cardiol. 2017 Aug;72(4):474-482. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1335455. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
PMID: 28705072BACKGROUNDBarbash IM, Barbanti M, Webb J, Molina-Martin De Nicolas J, Abramowitz Y, Latib A, Nguyen C, Deuschl F, Segev A, Sideris K, Buccheri S, Simonato M, Rosa FD, Tamburino C, Jilaihawi H, Miyazaki T, Himbert D, Schofer N, Guetta V, Bleiziffer S, Tchetche D, Imme S, Makkar RR, Vahanian A, Treede H, Lange R, Colombo A, Dvir D. Comparison of vascular closure devices for access site closure after transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 2015 Dec 14;36(47):3370-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv417. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PMID: 26314688BACKGROUNDSchwartz BG, Burstein S, Economides C, Kloner RA, Shavelle DM, Mayeda GS. Review of vascular closure devices. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Dec;22(12):599-607.
PMID: 21127366BACKGROUNDSekhar A, Sutton BS, Raheja P, Mohsen A, Anggelis E, Anggelis CN, Keith MC, Dawn B, Straton S, Flaherty MP. Femoral arterial closure using ProGlide(R) is more efficacious and cost-effective when ambulating early following cardiac catheterization. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2016 Oct 11;13:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.09.002. eCollection 2016 Dec.
PMID: 28616553BACKGROUNDNelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, Rao V, Bianchi C, Hashemi H, Jones P, Bacharach JM. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial). J Vasc Surg. 2014 May;59(5):1181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.101. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
PMID: 24440678BACKGROUNDSeeger J, Gonska B, Rodewald C, Rottbauer W, Wohrle J. Impact of suture mediated femoral access site closure with the Prostar XL compared to the ProGlide system on outcome in transfemoral aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:564-567. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.193. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
PMID: 27561160BACKGROUNDDurmus G, Belen E, Bayyigit A, Can MM. Comparison of Complication and Success Rates of ProGlide Closure Device in Patients Undergoing TAVI and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Aug 9;2018:2687862. doi: 10.1155/2018/2687862. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 30175119BACKGROUNDFranco CD, Goldsmith J, Veith FJ, Calligaro KD, Gupta SK, Wengerter KR. Management of arterial injuries produced by percutaneous femoral procedures. Surgery. 1993 Apr;113(4):419-25.
PMID: 8456398BACKGROUNDTsetis D. Endovascular treatment of complications of femoral arterial access. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Jun;33(3):457-68. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9820-3. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
PMID: 20162284BACKGROUNDSzentivanyi A, Borzsak S, Suvegh A, Berczi A, Szucsborus T, Ruzsa Z, Fontos G, Szalay CI, Papp R, Molnar L, Csobay-Novak C. Midterm Outcome of Balloon-Expandable Covered Stenting of Femoral Access Site Complications. J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 31;13(21):6550. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216550.
PMID: 39518689DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Csaba Csobay-Novák, MD, PhD
Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Noninvasive Imaging
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2022
First Posted
February 2, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
August 10, 2023
Study Completion
August 31, 2023
Last Updated
November 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share