NCT05220189

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this clinical trial is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for bladder cancer among patients with hematuria by comparing it to the results of cystoscopy examinations. The second objective is to compare the clinical performance of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test with a NMP22 test and urine cytology test with respect to bladder cancer. By histopathological examination, lesions identified during cystoscopy will be confirmed as malignant or non-malignant by histological examination.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,549

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 7, 2022

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 2, 2022

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 3, 2022

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 4, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

January 7, 2022

Last Update Submit

October 1, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Bladder cancerHematuriaMethylation biomarkerEarlyTect® Bladder Cancer testReal-time PCR (LTE-qMSP)Urine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test

    Sensitivity and specificity of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for detecting bladder cancer (Stages Ta high-grade and T1-T4) in patients with hematuria compared to the cystoscopy examination, both in terms of detecting bladder cancer. The reference method is the cystoscopic procedure, and lesions will be assessed histopathologically. EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test includes a measurement of PENK methylation and COL2A1 as a DNA control. PENK methylation in urine DNA will be assessed quantitatively by Linear Target Enrichment-coupled Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR (LTE-qMSP) using the Real-time PCR method. The results will be dichotomized by the CT (cycle threshold) cutoff value as either positive or negative. Sensitivity = 100\*(positive PENK methylation test/positive cystoscopy), Specificity = 100\*(negative PENK methylation test/negative cystoscopy).

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The performance of the EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test

    1 year

Other Outcomes (7)

  • Comparison of clinical sensitivity and specificity to the NMP22 test

    1 year

  • Comparison of clinical sensitivity and specificity to the urine cytology test

    1 year

  • Sensitivity of EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test for detecting bladder cancer with stages CIS and Ta low-grade

    1 year

  • +4 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Hematuria patients aged ≥40

Device: EarlyTect Bladder Cancer test, PENK methylation assay by LTE (Linear Target Enrichment)-qMSP (quantitative methylation-specific real time PCR)

Diagnostic Test: EarlyTect® Bladder Cancer test

Interventions

A highly accurate and sensitive real-time PCR employing Linear Target Enrichment and Quantitative Methylation-Specific PCR (LTE-qMSP) for measuring PENK methylation in urine DNA to detect bladder cancer in hematuria patients.

Hematuria patients aged ≥40

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with hematuria

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals who agree to voluntarily sign an informed consent prior to the initiation of screening
  • Adults aged ≥40
  • Subjects who have had gross or microscopic hematuria within the 3 months
  • Subjects who had no history of bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Subjects who will undergo cystoscopy, NMP22 test, and urine cytology within 1 month after consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who do not agree to voluntarily sign an informed consent prior to the initiation of screening
  • Subjects aged \<40 years
  • Subjects with a history of bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial cancer
  • Female who are currently menstruating or who have had their last menstrual period within the last 3 days
  • Subjects who have undergone invasive procedures in the urinary tract system within the last 3 months
  • Subjects with suspected upper urothelial cancer lesions on ultrasound or CT scan
  • Subjects who have previously received pelvic radiation therapy
  • Subjects who have been diagnosed with other cancers and have received or are currently receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 6 months
  • Subjects who require treatment for an active urinary tract infection or vaginitis
  • Subjects undergoing prostate cancer treatment or requiring a prostate biopsy
  • Subject has any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator should preclude participation in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Asan Medical Center

Seoul, 05505, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • 1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. 2. Charpentier M, Gutierrez C, Guillaudeux T, Verhoest G, Pedeux R. Noninvasive urine-based tests to diagnose or detect recurrence of bladder cancer. Cancers. 2021;13:1650. 3. Freedman ND, Silverman DT, Hollenbeck AR, Schatzkin A, Abnet CC. Association between smoking and risk of bladder cancer among men and women. JAMA 2011; 306: 737-745. 4. Kitamura H, Kakehi Y. Treatment and management of high-grade T1 bladder cancer: what should we do after second TUR? Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2015;45(4):315-322. 5. Sievert KD, Amend B, Nagele U, Schilling D, Bedke J, Horstmann M et al. Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs? World J Urol. 2009;27(3):295-300. 6. Nepple KG, O'Donnell MA. The optimal management of T1 high-grade bladder cancer. Can Urol Assoc. 2009,3(suppl4):S188-92. 7. Wakui M, Shiigai T: Urinary tract cancer screening through analysis of urinary red blood cell volume distribution. Int J Urol. 2000,7(7):248-253. 8. Yafi FA, Aprikian AG, Tanguay S, Kassouf W. Patients with microscopic and gross hematuria: practice and referral patterns among primary care physicians in a universal health care system. Con Urol Assoc J. 2011;5(2):97-101. 9. Beukers W, Kandimalla R, van Houwelingen D, Kovacic H, Chin JF, Lingsma HF et al. The use of molecular analyses in voided urine for the assessment of patients with hematuria. PLOS One. 2013;8(10):e77657. 10. Chung W, Bondaruk J, Jelinek J, Lotan Y, Liang S, Czerniak B et al: Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011,20(7):1483-91. 11. Oeyen E, Hoekx L, Wachter SD, Baldewijins M, Ameye F, Mertens I. Bladder cancer diagnosis and follow-up: The current status and possible role of extracellular vesicels. Mol. Sci. 2019;20(4),821 12. Sullivan PS, Chan JB, Levin MR, Rao J. Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2010;2(4):412-40. 13. Soria, F, Droller MJ, Lotan Y, Gontero P, D'Andrea D, Gust KM et al. An up-to-date catalog of available urinary biomarkers for the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2018;36:1981-95. 14. Hajdijak T. UroVysion FISH test for detecting urothelial cancers: meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy and comparison with urinary cytology testing. Urol Oncol 2008;26(6):646-51. 15. Mbeutcha A, Lucca I, Mathieu R, Lotan Y, Shariat SF. Current status of urinary biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Urol Clin N AM 2016;43:47-62 16. Chung W, Bondaruk J, Jelinek J, Lotan Y, Liang S, Czerniak B, Lssa JPJ. Detection of bladder cancer using novel DNA methylation biomarkers in urine sediments. Cancer Epidermiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(7):1483-91

    BACKGROUND

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITH DNA

Residual urine samples may be archived for further research. Clinical data and samples will be kept in a manner that preserves anonymity of the subjects, using the subject ID as the only tracking information. Specimens will be stored at Genomictree and may be used for future research.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsHematuria

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesUrination DisordersHemorrhagePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Cheol Kwak, MD PhD

    Seoul National University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Cheol Kwak, MD PhD

CONTACT

In Gab Jeong, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2022

First Posted

February 2, 2022

Study Start

February 3, 2022

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

January 31, 2024

Last Updated

October 4, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Locations