NCT05216666

Brief Summary

Residual limping after total hip arthroplasty is empirically associated with the use of lateral approach but has been reported in litterature even with the use of posterior approach. The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare the risk of residual limping one year after total hip arthropasty between lateral and posterior approach.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
580

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
31mo left

Started May 2022

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress61%
May 2022Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 15, 2022

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 31, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 11, 2022

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2027

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 9, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.6 years

First QC Date

January 15, 2022

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

abductorapproachlimpTrendelenburggluteus medius

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Trendelenburg sign as binary variable (positive/negative)

    Trendelenburg sign negative if the pelvis remains horisontal while standing only on the operated leg with both arms in anatomical postion. If the pelvismcannot be kept horisontal and tilts towards the kontralateral hip the Trendelenburgs sign is regarded as positive.

    At 12 months after intervention

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Dislocation

    Within 12 months from intervention

  • Intraoperative blood loss

    Intraoperative

  • Periprosthetic infection

    Within 12 months from intervention

  • Oxford Hip Score

    At 3 months after intervention

  • Oxford Hip Score

    At 12 months after intervention

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Lateral approach

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

290 participants receive their hip prosthesis through a lateral approach. The anterior third of m. gluteus medius along with the corresponding part of m. vastus lateralis are detached from the greater trochanter and the anterior capsule is excised for the exposure of the hip joint. After implant insertion, the gluteus medius is reinserted into the greater trochanter with non-absorbable sutures. Participants are followed at three and 12 months by a physiotherapist.

Procedure: Lateral approach

Posterior approach

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

290 participants receive their hip prosthesis through a posterior approach. The m. piriformis gemelli and obturator internus are detached from the greater trochanter and the posterior capsule is incised for the exposure of the hip joint. After implant insertion, the posterior capsule as well as m piriformis and the external rotators are reinserted into the greater trochanter with non-absorbable sutures. Participants are followed at three and 12 months by a physiotherapist.

Procedure: Posterior approach

Interventions

Total hip arthroplasty performed through a lateral surgical approach (Gammer)

Also known as: Gammer approach
Lateral approach

Total hip arthroplasty performed through a posterior surgical approach (Moore)

Also known as: Moore approach
Posterior approach

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Primary unilateral osteoarthritis of the hip scheduled for total hip arthroplasty.
  • Ability to understand and write swedish.

You may not qualify if:

  • Impaired funktion of the contralateral hip or knees causing limping.
  • Neuromuscular diseases
  • Postoperative leg length discrepancy excceding 1 cm
  • Postoperative discrepancy in femoral offset exceeding 25% of the femoral offset of the contralateral hip.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Mölndal, 431 80, Sweden

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):442-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919. Epub 2012 Oct 8.

    PMID: 23039167BACKGROUND
  • Zijlstra WP, De Hartog B, Van Steenbergen LN, Scheurs BW, Nelissen RGHH. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2017 Aug;88(4):395-401. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1317515. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

    PMID: 28440704BACKGROUND
  • Skoogh O, Tsikandylakis G, Mohaddes M, Nemes S, Odin D, Grant P, Rolfson O. Contemporary posterior surgical approach in total hip replacement: still more reoperations due to dislocation compared with direct lateral approach? An observational study of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register including 156,979 hips. Acta Orthop. 2019 Oct;90(5):411-416. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1610269. Epub 2019 May 7.

    PMID: 31060427BACKGROUND
  • Moerman S, Mathijssen NMC, Tuinebreijer WE, Vochteloo AJH, Nelissen RGHH. Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision. Acta Orthop. 2018 Oct;89(5):509-514. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1499069. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

    PMID: 30080985BACKGROUND
  • Whiteside LA, Roy ME. Incidence and treatment of abductor deficiency during total hip arthroplasty using the posterior approach: repair with direct suture technique and gluteus maximus flap transfer. Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):116-122. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1511.R1.

    PMID: 31146555BACKGROUND
  • Ewen AM, Stewart S, St Clair Gibson A, Kashyap SN, Caplan N. Post-operative gait analysis in total hip replacement patients-a review of current literature and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2012 May;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.024. Epub 2012 Mar 10.

    PMID: 22410129BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, HipMuscle WeaknessMuscular AtrophyIntermittent Claudication

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesMuscular DiseasesNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPeripheral Arterial DiseasePeripheral Vascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Georgios Tsikandylakis, MD PhD

    Sahlgrenska University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Georgios Tsikandylakis, MD PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior consultant in orthopaedic surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2022

First Posted

January 31, 2022

Study Start

May 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

April 9, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations