Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer
OMAMA
OMAMA-study - Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
330
1 country
13
Brief Summary
More than 70% of patients with cancer in the palliative phase have pain that often requires treatment with opioids (morphine-like agents). Constipation occurs in 59% of patients treated with opioids. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) has consequences that range from daily discomfort with social insecurity and disability to intestinal obstruction. It leads to limitations in self-management, a reduced quality of life and a risk of the need for more care. In the guideline "Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer" it is recommended to start preventively with an osmotic laxative such as macrogol/electrolytes or magnesium hydroxide when starting opioids. Macrogol/electrolytes has been proven to be effective for OIC, but is sometimes perceived by patients as unpleasant due to its taste. Magnesium hydroxide, which is less commonly prescribed for OIC, has a neutral taste. Although it is mentioned in the guideline, it is not studied for the treatment of OIC and also not officially registered for this. To support the advice of the guideline and to prove that a choice is possible, it is important to investigate whether there are differences in effectiveness and/or side effects between macrogol/electrolytes and magnesium hydroxide in the prevention of OIC. The aim of this study is to compare macrogol/electrolytes with magnesium hydroxide in the prevention of opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer in the palliative (incurable) phase, who start opioids because of pain. The choice of laxative is determined by drawing lots (randomisation). After two weeks, its effect will be assessed and will be presented as the percentage of patients who have not developed constipation after starting opioids. If the laxative, as assigned by lot, is described as satisfactory by the patient, the patient can continue with the drug that the patient used, after the study through regular prescription. The investigators will ask the patients in the study about their satisfaction with the laxative used, any side effects and the degree of pain. Furthermore, the appeal to care for possible constipation will be examined. Because the best attainable quality of life in the palliative phase is the objective of all care, the investigators will also measure this perceived quality with a questionnaire in this study. The results of this study will lead to the best achievable prevention of opioid constipation in patients with cancer in the palliative phase.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2022
Typical duration for phase_4
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 2, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 22, 2024
November 1, 2024
3 years
January 19, 2022
November 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The percentage of patients with a score of <30 of the Bowel Function Index
A clinician-administered patient-reported questionnaire to assess clinically significant constipation, validated in patients receiving opioids for chronic non-malignant pain and for malignant pain (Abramovitz 2013, Rentz 2009 and 2011). It consists of three questions, assessing ease of defecation, feeling of incomplete bowel evacuation and personal judgement of the patient regarding constipation, each during the last 7 days and each rated on a scale of 0 (best possible outcome) to 100 (worst possible outcome). A total score ≥30 (mean of the three separate scores) indicates clinically significant constipation. A change of the total score of \>12 is regarded as clinically meaningful. It has been used in a large observational study in cancer patients receiving opioids (Davies 2021) and in randomised trials of opioid antagonists for OIC (Ahmedzai 2012, Dupoiron 2017, Leng 2020, Poelaert 2015). It has been recommended as the assessment tool of choice for OIC (Argoff 2015, Farmer 2019).
On day 14
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The EQ5D
On day 0 and day 14
Rome IV criteria for opioid-induced constipation
On day 0 and day 14
Cancer pain score
On day 0 and day 14
Patient satisfaction with laxative
On day 14
Side effects of laxatives
On day 14
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Macrogol/electrolytes
ACTIVE COMPARATORMacrogol/electrolytes is started at a dose of 1 sachet once a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of macrogol/electrolytes may be increased to 2 sachets a day during the study period. The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.
Magnesium hydroxide
ACTIVE COMPARATORMagnesium hydroxide is started at a dose of 724 mg three times a day orally, based on the current guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of pain in patients with cancer' (www.pallialine.nl). The dose of magnesium hydroxide may be increased to 1448 mg three times a day during the study period. The effect of laxatives will be judged after 14 days.
Interventions
Information already included in arm/group description.
Information already included in arm/group description.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:
- Patients with metastatic cancer (≥18 years);
- Starting with slow release or transdermal opioids for pain;
- Able to complete a Dutch questionnaire. Previous treatment with opioids is allowed, if discontinued more than 4 weeks ago.
You may not qualify if:
- A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Patients with contra-indications for laxatives
- Use of laxatives during the last four weeks
- Severely impaired renal function (serum creatinine \>180 umol/l)
- Estimated life expectancy \<3 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmclead
- Leiden University Medical Centercollaborator
- University Medical Center Groningencollaborator
- Radboud University Medical Centercollaborator
- Erasmus Medical Centercollaborator
- Spaarne Gasthuiscollaborator
- Rijnstate Hospitalcollaborator
- Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuiscollaborator
- Flevoziekenhuiscollaborator
- Martini Hospital Groningencollaborator
- Haaglanden Medical Centrecollaborator
- UMC Utrechtcollaborator
- Groene Hart Ziekenhuiscollaborator
- Bernhoven Hospitalcollaborator
- Isalacollaborator
- Antoni van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis (AVL) Amsterdamcollaborator
Study Sites (13)
Flevoziekenhuis
Almere Stad, Flevoland, 1315 RA, Netherlands
Rijnstate Ziekenhuis
Arnhem, Gelderland, 6815 AD, Netherlands
Radboud university Medical center Nijmegen
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA, Netherlands
Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis
's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, 5223 GZ, Netherlands
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Spaarne Gasthuis
Hoofddorp, North Holland, 2134 TM, Netherlands
Groene Hart Hospital
Gouda, South Holland, 2803 HH, Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 GD, Netherlands
Haaglanden Medical Centre
The Hague, South Holland, 2512 VA, Netherlands
University Medical Center Groningen
Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
Martini Hospital Groningen
Groningen, 9728 NT, Netherlands
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, 3584 CX, Netherlands
Related Publications (28)
Abramowitz L, Beziaud N, Causse C, Chuberre B, Allaert FA, Perrot S. Further validation of the psychometric properties of the Bowel Function Index for evaluating opioid-induced constipation (OIC). J Med Econ. 2013 Dec;16(12):1434-41. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.851083. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
PMID: 24102611BACKGROUNDAhmedzai SH, Nauck F, Bar-Sela G, Bosse B, Leyendecker P, Hopp M. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy, parallel-group study to determine the safety and efficacy of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged-release tablets in patients with moderate/severe, chronic cancer pain. Palliat Med. 2012 Jan;26(1):50-60. doi: 10.1177/0269216311418869. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
PMID: 21937568BACKGROUNDArgoff CE, Brennan MJ, Camilleri M, Davies A, Fudin J, Galluzzi KE, Gudin J, Lembo A, Stanos SP, Webster LR. Consensus Recommendations on Initiating Prescription Therapies for Opioid-Induced Constipation. Pain Med. 2015 Dec;16(12):2324-37. doi: 10.1111/pme.12937. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
PMID: 26582720BACKGROUNDBell T, Annunziata K, Leslie JB. Opioid-induced constipation negatively impacts pain management, productivity, and health-related quality of life: findings from the National Health and Wellness Survey. J Opioid Manag. 2009 May-Jun;5(3):137-44. doi: 10.5055/jom.2009.0014.
PMID: 19662923BACKGROUNDChristensen HN, Olsson U, From J, Breivik H. Opioid-induced constipation, use of laxatives, and health-related quality of life. Scand J Pain. 2016 Apr;11:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PMID: 28850447BACKGROUNDDavies A, Leach C, Butler C, Gregory A, Henshaw S, Minton O, Shorthose K, Batsari KM. Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer: a "real-world," multicentre, observational study of diagnostic criteria and clinical features. Pain. 2021 Jan;162(1):309-318. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002024.
PMID: 32701649BACKGROUNDDhingra L, Shuk E, Grossman B, Strada A, Wald E, Portenoy A, Knotkova H, Portenoy R. A qualitative study to explore psychological distress and illness burden associated with opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients with advanced disease. Palliat Med. 2013 May;27(5):447-56. doi: 10.1177/0269216312450358. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
PMID: 22707180BACKGROUNDDrossman DA. Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features and Rome IV. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 19:S0016-5085(16)00223-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 27144617BACKGROUNDDunlop W, Uhl R, Khan I, Taylor A, Barton G. Quality of life benefits and cost impact of prolonged release oxycodone/naloxone versus prolonged release oxycodone in patients with moderate-to-severe non-malignant pain and opioid-induced constipation: a UK cost-utility analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):564-75. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.665279. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
PMID: 22313329BACKGROUNDDupoiron D, Stachowiak A, Loewenstein O, Ellery A, Kremers W, Bosse B, Hopp M. A phase III randomized controlled study on the efficacy and improved bowel function of prolonged-release (PR) oxycodone-naloxone (up to 160/80 mg daily) vs oxycodone PR. Eur J Pain. 2017 Oct;21(9):1528-1537. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1054. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
PMID: 28641363BACKGROUNDFarmer AD, Drewes AM, Chiarioni G, De Giorgio R, O'Brien T, Morlion B, Tack J. Pathophysiology and management of opioid-induced constipation: European expert consensus statement. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Feb;7(1):7-20. doi: 10.1177/2050640618818305. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
PMID: 30788113BACKGROUNDFreedman MD, Schwartz HJ, Roby R, Fleisher S. Tolerance and efficacy of polyethylene glycol 3350/electrolyte solution versus lactulose in relieving opiate induced constipation: a double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Oct;37(10):904-7. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04264.x.
PMID: 9505981BACKGROUNDGinex PK, Hanson BJ, LeFebvre KB, Lin Y, Moriarty KA, Maloney C, Vrabel M, Morgan RL. Management of Opioid-Induced and Non-Opioid-Related Constipation in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Nov 1;47(6):E211-E224. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.E211-E224.
PMID: 33063777BACKGROUNDHawley P, MacKenzie H, Gobbo M. PEG vs. sennosides for opioid-induced constipation in cancer care. Support Care Cancer. 2020 Apr;28(4):1775-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04944-5. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
PMID: 31321524BACKGROUNDHead SJ, Kaul S, Bogers AJ, Kappetein AP. Non-inferiority study design: lessons to be learned from cardiovascular trials. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jun;33(11):1318-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs099. Epub 2012 May 7.
PMID: 22564354BACKGROUNDHjalte F, Ragnarson Tennvall G, Welin KO, Westerling D. Treatment of Severe Pain and Opioid-induced Constipation: An Observational Study of Quality of Life, Resource Use, and Costs in Sweden. Pain Ther. 2016 Dec;5(2):227-236. doi: 10.1007/s40122-016-0059-9. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
PMID: 27830531BACKGROUNDIshihara M, Ikesue H, Matsunaga H, Suemaru K, Kitaichi K, Suetsugu K, Oishi R, Sendo T, Araki H, Itoh Y; Japanese Study Group for the Relief of Opioid-induced Gastrointestinal Dysfunction. A multi-institutional study analyzing effect of prophylactic medication for prevention of opioid-induced gastrointestinal dysfunction. Clin J Pain. 2012 Jun;28(5):373-81. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318237d626.
PMID: 22156893BACKGROUNDLyseng-Williamson KA. Correction to: Macrogol (polyethylene glycol) 4000 without electrolytes in the symptomatic treatment of chronic constipation: a profile of its use. Drugs Ther Perspect. 2019;35(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s40267-018-0588-x. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
PMID: 31186614BACKGROUNDPenning-van Beest FJ, van den Haak P, Klok RM, Prevoo YF, van der Peet DL, Herings RM. Quality of life in relation to constipation among opioid users. J Med Econ. 2010 Mar;13(1):129-35. doi: 10.3111/13696990903584436.
PMID: 20128662BACKGROUNDPickard AS, Wilke CT, Lin HW, Lloyd A. Health utilities using the EQ-5D in studies of cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(5):365-84. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725050-00002.
PMID: 17488136BACKGROUNDPoelaert J, Koopmans-Klein G, Dioh A, Louis F, Gorissen M, Loge D, Van Op den Bosch J, van Megen YJ. Treatment with prolonged-release oxycodone/naloxone improves pain relief and opioid-induced constipation compared with prolonged-release oxycodone in patients with chronic severe pain and laxative-refractory constipation. Clin Ther. 2015 Apr 1;37(4):784-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
PMID: 25757607BACKGROUNDRentz AM, Yu R, Muller-Lissner S, Leyendecker P. Validation of the Bowel Function Index to detect clinically meaningful changes in opioid-induced constipation. J Med Econ. 2009;12(4):371-83. doi: 10.3111/13696990903430481.
PMID: 19912069BACKGROUNDRentz AM, van Hanswijck de Jonge P, Leyendecker P, Hopp M. Observational, nonintervention, multicenter study for validation of the Bowel Function Index for constipation in European countries. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):35-44. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.535270. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
PMID: 21083515BACKGROUNDTaylor RR, Guest JF. The cost-effectiveness of macrogol 3350 compared to lactulose in the treatment of adults suffering from chronic constipation in the UK. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15;31(2):302-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04191.x. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
PMID: 19886948BACKGROUNDTeunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 May 23.
PMID: 17509812BACKGROUNDTokoro A, Imai H, Fumita S, Harada T, Noriyuki T, Gamoh M, Akashi Y, Sato H, Kizawa Y. Incidence of opioid-induced constipation in Japanese patients with cancer pain: A prospective observational cohort study. Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(10):4883-4891. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2341. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
PMID: 31231974BACKGROUNDWirz S, Klaschik E. Management of constipation in palliative care patients undergoing opioid therapy: is polyethylene glycol an option? Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2005 Sep-Oct;22(5):375-81. doi: 10.1177/104990910502200511.
PMID: 16225360BACKGROUNDKistemaker KRJ, de Graeff A, Crul M, de Klerk G, van de Ven PM, van der Meulen MP, van Zuylen L, Steegers MAH. Magnesium hydroxide versus macrogol/electrolytes in the prevention of opioid-induced constipation in incurable cancer patients: study protocol for an open-label, randomized controlled trial (the OMAMA study). BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 14;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01143-2.
PMID: 36915062DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lia van Zuylen, Prof.dr.
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 19, 2022
First Posted
January 31, 2022
Study Start
December 2, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11