Induction of Labor in Pregnant Women With Prelabor Rupture of Membranes - Oxytocin or Misoprostol
Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Pregnant Women With Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol versus oxytocin in induction of labor in pregnant women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 16, 2022
CompletedJune 23, 2022
June 1, 2022
12 months
January 5, 2022
June 22, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
vaginal delivery
rate of successful vaginal delivery
immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (5)
induction to active phase time
during the intervention
Induction to delivery time
during the intervention
Apgar score
The score is reported at 1 minute and 5 minutes after birth for all infants
NICU admission
within 24hours after birth
maternal side effects
during labour and within 24hours after birth
Study Arms (2)
misoprostol group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR25µg misoprostol oral tablet every 4 hours with maximum200 µg
oxytocin group
ACTIVE COMPARATORoxytocin infusion according to ASUMH local protocol: Put 3IU oxytocin (3000mIU) +50ml of normal saline in syringe pump= (60mIU/ml). Commence at 1ml/hour (1mIU/min) for 1/2 hour. * If contractions inadequate +fetal monitor healthy 2 ml/hour for 1/2 hour. * If contractions inadequate +fetal monitor healthy 4 ml/hour for 1/2 hour. * If contractions inadequate +fetal monitor healthy 6 ml/hour for 1/2 hour. * If contractions inadequate +fetal monitor healthy increase by 2ml/hr. for max. 27ml/hour. At any point there's fetal or maternal distress (e.g. pathological FHR pattern, antepartum hemorrhage, etc.) the study intervention will be stopped, and the maternal/fetal condition will be managed by cesarean section.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Gestational age (36-42 weeks).
- Prelabor rupture of membranes within the last 24hours
- Vertex presentation
You may not qualify if:
- History of medical diseases (HTN, diabetes milletus, systemic lupus erythematosus, cardiac, etc.).
- Antepartum hemorrhage
- Chorioamnionitis / prelabor rupture of membranes \>24hours
- Multiple pregnancy.
- Abnormal fetal heart rate pattern upon admission
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Fetal malpresentation.
- Previous uterine scar.
- Estimated fetal weight more than 4kg.
- Patients already in labor
- Contraindication for prostaglandin/oxytocin use (allergy,..)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 13;2014(6):CD001338. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001338.pub3.
PMID: 24924489BACKGROUNDZeteroglu S, Engin-Ustun Y, Ustun Y, Guvercinci M, Sahin G, Kamaci M. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 May;19(5):283-7. doi: 10.1080/14767050600589807.
PMID: 16753768BACKGROUNDAhmed RHM, Sweed MSE, El-Bishry GA, Hassan RK. Oxytocin Versus Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor in Pregnant Women with Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Reprod Sci. 2023 Dec;30(12):3507-3514. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01290-0. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
PMID: 37442883DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohamed S Sweed, MD
Professor
- STUDY CHAIR
Gasser A Elbishry, MD
Professor
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2022
First Posted
January 31, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 15, 2022
Study Completion
May 16, 2022
Last Updated
June 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- After study completion and for 6months later
- Access Criteria
- However, the repository is not decided upon yet
planning to share the study protocol, and master-sheet.