High vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccine in Lung Allograft Recipients
Comparison of High Dose vs. Standard Dose Influenza Vaccines in Lung Allograft Recipients
1 other identifier
interventional
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lung allograft recipients have a higher burden of influenza disease and greater associated morbidity and mortality compared with healthy controls. Induction and early maintenance immunosuppression is thought to impair immunogenicity to standard dose inactivated influenza vaccine. This early post-transplant period is when immunity is most desirable, since influenza disease during this time frame is associated with adverse consequences. Thus, strategies to reduce severe influenza disease in this highly susceptible population are critical. No trials in lung transplant recipients have evaluated two doses of HD-IIV within the same influenza season as a strategy to improve immunogenicity and durability of influenza prevention. Furthermore, no influenza vaccine trials have focused on enrollment of subjects at early post-transplant timepoints. Very few studies have been performed in solely lung allograft recipients. Immunosuppression intensity is highest in lung patients, thereby limiting comparisons to recipients of heart, liver, and kidney transplants. Therefore, studies to assess both HD-IIV and two-dose strategies in the same influenza season in post-lung transplant recipients are greatly needed. The central hypothesis of our proposal is that lung allograft recipients who are 1-35 months post-transplant and receiving two doses of HD-quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (QIV) will have higher HAI geometric mean titers (GMT) to influenza antigens compared to those receiving two doses of SD-QIV. To test this hypothesis and address the above critical knowledge gaps, we propose to conduct a phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled immunogenicity and safety trial comparing the administration of two doses of HD-QIV to two doses of SD-QIV in lung allograft recipients 1-35 months post-transplant. The results of this clinical trial will address significant knowledge gaps regarding influenza vaccine strategies (e.g., one vs. two doses and HD-QIV vs. SD-QIV) and immune responses in lung transplant recipients and will guide vaccine recommendations during the post-transplant period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2022
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 8, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
December 8, 2025
December 1, 2025
4.7 years
January 18, 2022
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Geometric Mean Titers of influenza vaccine antibodies.
Antibody titers will be measured by hemagglutination inhibition assay.
Day 56 (post-vaccination)
The number of participants reporting solicited injection site reactions and systemic reactions.
Post-vaccination local adverse events (pain, tenderness, swelling/induration, erythema/redness, swelling/induration size, and erythema/redness size) and systemic adverse events (Fatigue/malaise, headache, nausea, body ache/myalgia (not at the injection site), general activity level, vomiting, and fever).
Within 7 days post-vaccination
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Geometric Mean Titers Ratio of influenza vaccine antibodies (post-/pre-vaccination).
Day 56 (post-vaccination)
The number of participants achieving seroprotection and seroconversion for influenza virus.
Day 56 (post-vaccination)
Study Arms (2)
Two Doses High Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
EXPERIMENTALtwo doses of HD-QIV (0.7 mL; 60µg of each influenza antigen) 28-42 days apart
Two Doses Standard Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
EXPERIMENTALreceive two doses of SD-QIV (0.5 mL; 15µg of each influenza antigen) 28-42 days apart
Interventions
Fluzone ® Quadrivalent is a vaccine indicated for active immunization for the prevention of influenza disease caused by two influenza A subtype viruses and two type B viruses contained in the vaccine.
Fluzone High-Dose (Influenza Vaccine) for intramuscular injection is an inactivated influenza vaccine, prepared from influenza viruses propagated in embryonated chicken eggs. The virus-containing allantoic fluid is harvested and inactivated with formaldehyde. Influenza virus is concentrated and purified in a linear sucrose density gradient solution using a continuous flow centrifuge. The virus is then chemically disrupted using a non-ionic surfactant, octylphenol ethoxylate (Triton® X-100), producing a "split virus". The split virus is further purified and then suspended in sodium phosphatebuffered isotonic sodium chloride solution. The Fluzone High-Dose process uses an additional concentration factor after the ultrafiltration step in order to obtain a higher hemagglutinin (HA) antigen concentration.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lung allograft recipients
- Age ≥16 years at time of enrollment
- ≥1 month (30 days) and \<36 months post-lung transplant
- Anticipated to be available for duration of the study
- Can be reached by telephone, email, or text message
You may not qualify if:
- Recipient of multi-organ, extra-pulmonary, and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplant
- Recipient of a re-do lung transplant
- History of severe hypersensitivity to previous influenza vaccination or anaphylaxis to eggs/egg protein
- History of Guillain-Barre syndrome
- HIV positive patients, by history or documentation from previous test
- History of known severe latex hypersensitivity
- History of receiving the current season's influenza vaccine post-transplant prior to enrollment in the study
- Pregnant female
- Proven influenza disease after September 1st and before first study vaccine (patient can still receive the second influenza vaccination despite proven influenza disease once enrolled)
- CMVIG/IVIG/SCIG receipt within 28 days of each vaccine
- Receipt of rituximab or other B-cell depleting antibody (including proteasome inhibitors) therapy within 3-months of 1st study vaccine (Day 0).
- Receipt of augmented T-cell depleting therapy within 3-months of 1st study vaccine (Day 0)
- Investigator concern about study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centerlead
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicinecollaborator
- University of Alabama at Birminghamcollaborator
- Duke Universitycollaborator
- University of Washingtoncollaborator
- Emory Universitycollaborator
- Baylor College of Medicinecollaborator
- NYU Langone Healthcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Natasha Halasa, MD. MPH
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All study staff, and subjects will be blinded to which vaccine the subject will receive, except for an un-blinded vaccinator. This individual will not inform the study team or the subjects which vaccine they administered to the subject. The un-blinded vaccinator will not participate in any other study activities. If the study vaccine is provided in a blinded manner, then research staff will be able to administer the vaccine, and an un-blinded vaccinator will not be necessary. The pharmacy will be un-blinded and will have a record of which vaccine was given to each subject.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 18, 2022
First Posted
January 31, 2022
Study Start
November 8, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share