Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After UKA
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the percentage of early micromibilisation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in robot-assisted technique vs standard technique.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
January 23, 2026
January 1, 2026
6.2 years
September 27, 2021
January 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
3 months
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
6 months
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
12 months
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
6 months
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
24 months
American Knee Society score
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Oxford Knee Score
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Robot-assisted UKA
EXPERIMENTALUnicompartmental knee replacement (Journey II UKA, Smith and Nephew, USA) positioned via CORI surgical system (Smith \& Nephew, USA).
Standard technique UKA
ACTIVE COMPARATORUnicompartmental knee replacement (Journey II UKA, Smith and Nephew, USA) positioned via standard technique.
Interventions
Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and robotic assistance. Tourniquet will be used in all patients.
Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and standard technique. Tourniquet will be used in all patients.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unicompartmental Knee Arthrosis
- Femoral condyles or medial tibial plate osteonecrosis
- Healthy anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament and collateral ligaments of the affected knee
- Post traumatic loss of joint configuration
- Moderate varism deformity
- Patients between 50 and 80 years old
- Patients able to undergo a 2-year follow up after surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Bi or Tricompartmental arthrosis
- Unhealty anterior or posterior cruciate ligaments or collateral ligaments
- Patients with neuromuscolar, degenerative and joint-related conditions
- Patients younger than 50
- Patients older than 80
- Patients unable to undergo a 2-year follow up after surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Istituto Ortopedico Rizzolilead
- Smith & Nephew, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40136, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof.
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Prof.
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- STUDY CHAIR
Stefano Fratini, Dr.
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- STUDY CHAIR
Stefano Di Paolo, Eng.
University of Bologna
- STUDY CHAIR
Laura Bragonzoni, Dr.
University of Bologna
- STUDY CHAIR
Raffaele Zinno, Dr.
University of Bologna
- STUDY CHAIR
Giuseppe Barone, Dr.
University of Bologna
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- At the research office of health professions at IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli in Bologna, Italy (coordinating centre), a block of 5 randomisation list using the site "www.randomisation.com" will be generated. A sequence of opaque envelopes will be set up with a sequential number on the outside. A label will be placed iside the envelope that will contain the words "CORI" or "STANDARD", according to the sequence indicated by the generated list. Envelopes will be always sealed at the Research Centre and the list kept under lock. The envelopes will be placed in a dedicated box and delivered to the studio manager.
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Orthopaedics and Traumatology II Clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 27, 2021
First Posted
January 24, 2022
Study Start
October 7, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No sharing planned