Study Stopped
Not enough subjects were recruited for the study.
Carriere Motion Appliance* Versus In-office Sectional Appliance
CMA
A Comparison of Class II Correction Using the Carriere Motion Appliance Versus an In-Office Sectional Appliance: Treatment Effects and Efficiency
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The "sagittal first" approach to Class II correction in orthodontic treatment involves correcting the antero-posterior (AP) relationship of the maxillary and mandibular dentition prior to the leveling and aligning phase of orthodontic treatment. The Carriere Motion Appliance (CMA) was made to provide sagittal correction prior to orthodontic treatment with minimal secondary tooth movements that are typically seen with Class II correction. The aim in this study is to explore the efficacy and efficiency of Class II molar correction in adolescent patients using the sagittal first approach with either a sectional, in-office fabricated appliance or the CMA, by measuring total treatment duration (in months) as well as comparing dental and skeletal measurements taken from lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained prior to Class II correction (T0) and immediately after removal of the appliance (T1). The investigators will also be comparing secondary molar and canine rotational movements after Class II correction by comparing digital dental casts obtained at T0 and T1.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 23, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 17, 2025
CompletedMarch 17, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.1 years
December 22, 2021
March 26, 2024
March 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Total Treatment Time
Months
From date of Class II correction appliance delivery to date of removal of Class II correction appliance after Class I molar and canine relationship has been established (approximately 120-180 days).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Skeletal Changes
From date of Class II correction appliance delivery to date of removal of Class II correction appliance after Class I molar and canine relationship has been established (approximately 120-180 days).
Dental Changes
From date of Class II correction appliance delivery to date of removal of Class II correction appliance after Class I molar and canine relationship has been established (approximately 120-180 days).
Maxillary Canine and Maxillary First Molar Rotation
From date of Class II correction appliance delivery to date of removal of Class II correction appliance after Class I molar and canine relationship has been established (approximately 120-180 days).
Study Arms (2)
In-office fabricated appliance
EXPERIMENTALA customized in-office fabricated appliance using the printed digital model of the subject will be used for AP correction. AP correction will be completed following CMA protocol (see model description)
Carriere Motion Appliance
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe appropriate length appliance will be placed as directed in the CMA handbook on the maxillary first molar and canine. AP correction will be completed following CMA protocol (see model description)
Interventions
A 0.022 Slot MBT™ second molar mini tube that has been modified to have a 2 mm length will be placed on the maxillary first molar and a 0.018 slot MBT™ maxillary canine bracket will be placed on the maxillary canine, with a 0.016x0.022 stainless-steel wire spanning from the maxillary first molar to the maxillary canine. A bayonet bend will be placed mesial to the molar tube. A curve will be bent into the wire, so that the wire is able to passively rest on the buccal surface of the maxillary canine. A stainless-steel closed coil will span the molar to canine and lay flush to the mesial portion of the molar tube and the distal portion of the canine bracket. The wire will be cinched mesial to the maxillary canine tie-wing and also 2-3 mm distal to the maxillary first molar to ensure that the molar can rotate during treatment, if needed. A stainless-steel tie will be used to secure the wire into the canine bracket. AP correction will be completed following CMA protocol
A bar spanning from the maxillary first molar to canine with a ball and socket joint at the molar and a canine pad at the canine. A slight bend is present between the molar and canine bracket. The ball and socket is designed to allow the molar to rotate to -15 degrees along it's longitudinal axis. The appliance claims that it allows for Class II correction with minimal secondary tooth movements when used with mandibular anchorage.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and Females
- Presenting for comprehensive orthodontic treatment at the Postgraduate orthodontic clinic at the University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine
- Unilateral or bilateral ½-cusp to full-cusp Class II molar and canine relationship
- Growing Patients (\~12-17y 11m)
- Subjects who do not require extractions as part of treatment mechanics
- Mild to moderate crowding
You may not qualify if:
- Patients in mixed dentition
- Any missing teeth up to and including permanent first molars
- Bilateral molar relationship of less than ½ cusp Class II prior to appliance cementation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine
Buffalo, New York, 14214, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- No Dr. Alexandria Newton
- Organization
- University at Buffalo
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
David Covell, DDS, PhD
Orthodontics Department Chair, University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Lateral cephalometric radiographs and digital study models will be de-identified prior to landmarking and obtaining measurements. The appliances will not be present on the patient when these records are obtained and therefore, when taking measurements, the outcomes assessor will not know which intervention the subjects received.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthodontic Resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2021
First Posted
January 24, 2022
Study Start
January 19, 2022
Primary Completion
February 23, 2023
Study Completion
February 23, 2023
Last Updated
March 17, 2025
Results First Posted
March 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03