Deep Sclerectomy vs Xen in Solo Procedure
SPXen
1 other identifier
observational
282
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world and the second leading cause of blindness after cataract after the age of 50. Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only treatment option to prevent visual field degradation. While medical treatment and selective laser trabeculoplasty are considered first-line options in open-angle glaucoma, the surgical option is considered in patients who have uncontrolled IOP under maximal tolerated medical treatment. In this situation, trabeculectomy or deep nonperforating sclerectomy may be performed. Although it is uncertain whether SPNP is superior to trabeculectomy, which is considered the gold standard of surgery, SPNP is a procedure that offers a better quality of life and fewer intra- and postoperative complications. SPNP was first described by Zimmerman. It consists in peeling off the internal wall of Schlemm's canal and the juxta-canalicular trabeculum which represent the main resistances to the evacuation of the aqueous humor. The trabecular meshwork is left intact and acts as a filter membrane between the subconjunctival space and the anterior chamber. The addition of mitomycin (MMC) is necessary because it is associated with better IOP control and greater surgical success. Although postoperative procedures such as needling or Nd:YAG laser-assisted gonioponctures are often required, SPNP offers good long-term results in patients who are naïve to any filtering surgery. Minimally invasive surgery has been used more and more over the last 10 years. It aims to reduce surgical complications in comparison to classical filtering procedures while respecting the eye's own anatomy. Several devices have been invented to increase aqueous humor elimination. They can be implanted ab-interno or ab-externo and can be implanted in the suprachoroidal space, in Schlemm's canal or in the subconjunctival space. The XEN gelstent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is placed ab-interno between the subconjunctival space and the anterior chamber, either in combination with cataract surgery or as a solo procedure. The aim of the study is to compare the surgical success of these 2 techniques. No study has ever compared these 2 surgeries in solo procedure. A recent retrospective trial compared them in combined procedures without showing significant differences in IOP reduction. Nevertheless, the short follow-up period of 9 months may have been insufficient to show a real difference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jul 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 21, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 6, 2022
CompletedApril 28, 2023
April 1, 2023
3 months
December 31, 2021
April 26, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of surgical success at last visit in both groups
This outcome corresponds to intraocular pressure assessed at last visit, an average of 6 months.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Intra- and postoperative complications
through study completion, an average of 6 months
number of antiglaucoma medications
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Eligibility Criteria
Nonperforating deep sclerectomy and XEN surgery patients in solo procedure between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2018.
You may qualify if:
- Patient whose age ≥ 18 years
- Patient with primary or secondary open angle glaucoma
- Patient who has undergone a SPNP or XEN procedure in solo
- French speaking patient
You may not qualify if:
- Angle closure
- Less than 6 months follow-up
- History of eye filtering surgery included
- Patient under guardianship or curatorship
- Patient deprived of liberty
- Patient under court protection
- Patient objecting to the use of his/her data for this research
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris, 75014, France
Related Publications (5)
GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
PMID: 33275949BACKGROUNDGazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, Garg A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, Ambler G, Bunce C, Wormald R, Nathwani N, Barton K, Rubin G, Buszewicz M; LiGHT Trial Study Group. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1505-1516. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32213-X. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
PMID: 30862377BACKGROUNDEldaly MA, Bunce C, Elsheikha OZ, Wormald R. Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 15;2014(2):CD007059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007059.pub2.
PMID: 24532137BACKGROUNDRulli E, Biagioli E, Riva I, Gambirasio G, De Simone I, Floriani I, Quaranta L. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1573-82. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5059.
PMID: 24158640BACKGROUNDTouboul A, Fels A, Morin A, Bensmail D, Lachkar Y. One-Year Outcomes of Standalone XEN Gel Stent Versus Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy. J Glaucoma. 2022 Dec 1;31(12):955-965. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002108. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
PMID: 36001498RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yves LACHKAR, MD
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 31, 2021
First Posted
January 21, 2022
Study Start
July 15, 2021
Primary Completion
September 28, 2021
Study Completion
October 6, 2022
Last Updated
April 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04