NCT05201378

Brief Summary

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world and the second leading cause of blindness after cataract after the age of 50. Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is the only treatment option to prevent visual field degradation. While medical treatment and selective laser trabeculoplasty are considered first-line options in open-angle glaucoma, the surgical option is considered in patients who have uncontrolled IOP under maximal tolerated medical treatment. In this situation, trabeculectomy or deep nonperforating sclerectomy may be performed. Although it is uncertain whether SPNP is superior to trabeculectomy, which is considered the gold standard of surgery, SPNP is a procedure that offers a better quality of life and fewer intra- and postoperative complications. SPNP was first described by Zimmerman. It consists in peeling off the internal wall of Schlemm's canal and the juxta-canalicular trabeculum which represent the main resistances to the evacuation of the aqueous humor. The trabecular meshwork is left intact and acts as a filter membrane between the subconjunctival space and the anterior chamber. The addition of mitomycin (MMC) is necessary because it is associated with better IOP control and greater surgical success. Although postoperative procedures such as needling or Nd:YAG laser-assisted gonioponctures are often required, SPNP offers good long-term results in patients who are naïve to any filtering surgery. Minimally invasive surgery has been used more and more over the last 10 years. It aims to reduce surgical complications in comparison to classical filtering procedures while respecting the eye's own anatomy. Several devices have been invented to increase aqueous humor elimination. They can be implanted ab-interno or ab-externo and can be implanted in the suprachoroidal space, in Schlemm's canal or in the subconjunctival space. The XEN gelstent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) is placed ab-interno between the subconjunctival space and the anterior chamber, either in combination with cataract surgery or as a solo procedure. The aim of the study is to compare the surgical success of these 2 techniques. No study has ever compared these 2 surgeries in solo procedure. A recent retrospective trial compared them in combined procedures without showing significant differences in IOP reduction. Nevertheless, the short follow-up period of 9 months may have been insufficient to show a real difference.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
282

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 28, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 31, 2021

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 6, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 28, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 31, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Rate of surgical success at last visit in both groups

    This outcome corresponds to intraocular pressure assessed at last visit, an average of 6 months.

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Intra- and postoperative complications

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

  • number of antiglaucoma medications

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Nonperforating deep sclerectomy and XEN surgery patients in solo procedure between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2018.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient whose age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient with primary or secondary open angle glaucoma
  • Patient who has undergone a SPNP or XEN procedure in solo
  • French speaking patient

You may not qualify if:

  • Angle closure
  • Less than 6 months follow-up
  • History of eye filtering surgery included
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under court protection
  • Patient objecting to the use of his/her data for this research

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Paris, 75014, France

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

    PMID: 33275949BACKGROUND
  • Gazzard G, Konstantakopoulou E, Garway-Heath D, Garg A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, Ambler G, Bunce C, Wormald R, Nathwani N, Barton K, Rubin G, Buszewicz M; LiGHT Trial Study Group. Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus eye drops for first-line treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma (LiGHT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1505-1516. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32213-X. Epub 2019 Mar 9.

    PMID: 30862377BACKGROUND
  • Eldaly MA, Bunce C, Elsheikha OZ, Wormald R. Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 15;2014(2):CD007059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007059.pub2.

    PMID: 24532137BACKGROUND
  • Rulli E, Biagioli E, Riva I, Gambirasio G, De Simone I, Floriani I, Quaranta L. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec;131(12):1573-82. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5059.

    PMID: 24158640BACKGROUND
  • Touboul A, Fels A, Morin A, Bensmail D, Lachkar Y. One-Year Outcomes of Standalone XEN Gel Stent Versus Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy. J Glaucoma. 2022 Dec 1;31(12):955-965. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002108. Epub 2022 Aug 22.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ocular HypertensionEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Yves LACHKAR, MD

    Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2021

First Posted

January 21, 2022

Study Start

July 15, 2021

Primary Completion

September 28, 2021

Study Completion

October 6, 2022

Last Updated

April 28, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations