NCT05201209

Brief Summary

Complex anal fistula is a fistula whose treatment with fistulotomy would expose the patient to an excessive risk of post-operative continence disorders. It is a challenge in proctological surgery because of the complexity of its therapeutic management in relation to the recurrences' frequency and the need to preserve sphincter function. Indeed, management is mainly based on fistulotomy techniques, but the latter expose patients to a significant alteration of their continence (less than 10% incontinence for simple fistulas but 30-50% for complex fistulas). In addition, these fistulas' management is constraining for patients due to the need for multiple interventions, long-term post-operative care and repeated discontinuation of activity. Sphincteral saving techniques have therefore developed over the last three decades and have enriched the therapeutic panel of complex fistulas. They aim to block fistula pathways without risking altering sphincter function. In addition, their surgical consequences are often simple. However, they are associated with a greater risk of failure than after fistulotomy and sometimes disappointing to the point that some of these techniques have been gradually abandoned (biological glue and plug for example). Among these sphincteral saving techniques, the investigators know the advancement flap, the injection of biological glue, plug's installation, the LIFT (Ligation of Inter sphincteric Fistula Tract), the clip's use but also, more recently a laser treatment, FiLaC™ (for Fistula Laser Closure), knowing that the idea was not new since the ND-YAG3 and CO24.5 lasers were already used in the treatment of anal fistulas, about twenty years ago, in experimental studies. This technique consists of radiating 360° laser energy radially into the fistula path to "burn" it and causing thermal destruction by coagulation of the fistula wall ans granulation tissue2. It can bo offered to any type of fistula at risk on continence, including horseshoe extensions that can be treated at the same time. It is well suited for outpatient management because the postoperative period is simple and painless. The literature is still poor on the subject with some studies published openly but the preliminary results are encouraging with a success rate of about 70%. No continence disorders reported.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 7, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 2, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 2, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 1, 2019

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 21, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 21, 2022

Status Verified

August 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 1, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

FistulaLaserSphincter

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assess on a larger scale the cure rate of patients treated by the proctology department between May 2017 and May 2018 for complex anal fistula.

    Clinical cure rate (in percentage) of complex anal fistula treated with FiLaC at the last medical contact in Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Identify predictive factors for clinical fistula healing to determine the best indications.

    6 months

  • Confirm on a larger scale the absence of anal incontinence after treatment with FiLaC™ .

    1 year

  • Description of possible complications

    1 year

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patient with complex anal fistula treated by the FiLaC™ between 05/01/17 and 05/01/18

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with complex anal fistula treated by the FiLaC™ between 05/01/17 and 05/01/18

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient scheduled for treatment by FiLaC™ and collected as such but finally treated by fistulotomy given a fistula pathway considered intraoperatively less complex than expected
  • Patient with recto vaginal or vaginal skin fistula
  • Patient under guardianship or curators
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient objecting to the use of their data for this research

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014, France

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Limura E, Giordano P. Modern management of anal fistula. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan 7;21(1):12-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i1.12.

    PMID: 25574077BACKGROUND
  • Wilhelm A. A new technique for sphincter-preserving anal fistula repair using a novel radial emitting laser probe. Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Dec;15(4):445-9. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0726-0. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

    PMID: 21845480BACKGROUND
  • Ellison GW, Bellah JR, Stubbs WP, Van Gilder J. Treatment of perianal fistulas with ND:YAG laser--results in twenty cases. Vet Surg. 1995 Mar-Apr;24(2):140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01308.x.

    PMID: 7778253BACKGROUND
  • Bodzin JH. Laser ablation of complex perianal fistulas preserves continence and is a rectum-sparing alternative in Crohn's disease patients. Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):627-31; discussion 632.

    PMID: 9655272BACKGROUND
  • Slutzki S, Abramsohn R, Bogokowsky H. Carbon dioxide laser in the treatment of high anal fistula. Am J Surg. 1981 Mar;141(3):395-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90207-5.

    PMID: 6782904BACKGROUND
  • Giamundo P, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M. Closure of fistula-in-ano with laser--FiLaC: an effective novel sphincter-saving procedure for complex disease. Colorectal Dis. 2014 Feb;16(2):110-5. doi: 10.1111/codi.12440.

    PMID: 24119103BACKGROUND
  • Dudukgian H, Abcarian H. Why do we have so much trouble treating anal fistula? World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul 28;17(28):3292-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i28.3292.

    PMID: 21876616BACKGROUND
  • Soltani A, Kaiser AM. Endorectal advancement flap for cryptoglandular or Crohn's fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Apr;53(4):486-95. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181ce8b01.

    PMID: 20305451BACKGROUND
  • Lindsey I, Smilgin-Humphreys MM, Cunningham C, Mortensen NJ, George BD. A randomized, controlled trial of fibrin glue vs. conventional treatment for anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Dec;45(12):1608-15. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-7247-0.

    PMID: 12473883BACKGROUND
  • Swinscoe MT, Ventakasubramaniam AK, Jayne DG. Fibrin glue for fistula-in-ano: the evidence reviewed. Tech Coloproctol. 2005 Jul;9(2):89-94. doi: 10.1007/s10151-005-0204-7. Epub 2005 Jul 8.

    PMID: 16007368BACKGROUND
  • Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN. Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Mar;49(3):371-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0288-1.

    PMID: 16421664BACKGROUND
  • Ortiz H, Marzo J, Ciga MA, Oteiza F, Armendariz P, de Miguel M. Randomized clinical trial of anal fistula plug versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Br J Surg. 2009 Jun;96(6):608-12. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6613.

    PMID: 19402190BACKGROUND
  • Ozturk E, Gulcu B. Laser ablation of fistula tract: a sphincter-preserving method for treating fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):360-4. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000067.

    PMID: 24509460BACKGROUND
  • Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Mar;90(3):581-6.

    PMID: 17427539BACKGROUND
  • Liu WY, Aboulian A, Kaji AH, Kumar RR. Long-term results of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Mar;56(3):343-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318278164c.

    PMID: 23392149BACKGROUND
  • Herreros MD, Garcia-Arranz M, Guadalajara H, De-La-Quintana P, Garcia-Olmo D; FATT Collaborative Group. Autologous expanded adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of complex cryptoglandular perianal fistulas: a phase III randomized clinical trial (FATT 1: fistula Advanced Therapy Trial 1) and long-term evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Jul;55(7):762-72. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318255364a.

    PMID: 22706128BACKGROUND
  • Giamundo P, Esercizio L, Geraci M, Tibaldi L, Valente M. Fistula-tract Laser Closure (FiLaC): long-term results and new operative strategies. Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Aug;19(8):449-53. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1282-9. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

    PMID: 25724967BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fistula

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Vincent De PARADES, M.D

    Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2019

First Posted

January 21, 2022

Study Start

February 7, 2019

Primary Completion

June 2, 2019

Study Completion

June 2, 2019

Last Updated

January 21, 2022

Record last verified: 2019-08

Locations