Exemplar: Determining the Best Practices for EMA Studies
Exemplar
1 other identifier
interventional
416
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a measurement methodology that utilizes the repeated collection of real-time data on participants' behavior and experience in their natural environment. While EMA allows researchers to gain valuable insights into dynamic behavioral processes, the need for frequent self-report can be burdensome and disruptive to participants. Compliance with EMA protocols is important for accurate, unbiased sampling, yet there is no "gold standard" for EMA study design. In the present study, the investigators aim to use a factorial design to identify the optimal components, or combinations of components, for achieving the highest compliance rates for smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments (EMAs). Participants will be randomized into 1 of 32 conditions in a 2x2x2x2x2 design (i.e., number of questions per EMA survey \[15 vs. 25\] x number of EMAs per day \[2 vs. 4\] x EMA prompting schedule \[random vs. fixed times\]) x payment type \[per EMA vs. based on percentage of EMAs completed\] x order of EMA item question types \[i.e., slider type first 2 weeks vs. Likert-type questions first 2 weeks\]). All participants will complete EMAs for 4 weeks. The effect of each factor on EMA compliance will be examined, as well as the effects of interactions on EMA compliance. The investigators will also examine within and between-subjects factors that influence response rates, and 2) contextual features such as environment and mood that may be associated with better compliance and participant engagement. The results of this study will have broad applications for developing best practices guidelines for future studies utilizing EMA methodologies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 18, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 26, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 26, 2022
CompletedJanuary 10, 2023
January 1, 2023
11 months
November 10, 2021
January 9, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of assigned daily smartphone surveys that are completed.
Proportion of daily smartphone surveys completed will vary based upon group assignment.
through study completion for each participant, 28 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of minutes required to complete the smartphone-based surveys.
through study completion for each participant, 28 days
Study Arms (32)
Group 1
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 2
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 3
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 4
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Group 5
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 6
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 7
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 8
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Group 9
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 10
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 11
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 12
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Group 13
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 14
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 15
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 16
EXPERIMENTAL$1 Payment per EMA 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Group 17
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 18
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 19
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 20
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Group 21
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 22
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 23
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 24
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 2 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Group 25
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 26
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 27
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 28
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 15 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Group 29
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Slider first
Group 30
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Fixed schedule Likert first
Group 31
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Slider first
Group 32
EXPERIMENTALPayment by % EMAs 4 EMAs per day 25 questions per EMA Random schedule Likert first
Interventions
Various settings for ecological momentary assessments
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years of age
- Demonstrate \> 6th grade English literacy level
- Possess an active Android smartphone that is compatible with the Insight (TM) platform with a data plan and an operating system version 6.0 or higher
- Agree to install the study smartphone application onto their personal phone
- Agree to complete EMAs prompted by and completed through the study smartphone application
You may not qualify if:
- Under 18 years of age
- Demonstrates \< 6th grade English literacy level
- Does not possess an active Android smartphone that is compatible with the Insight (TM) platform with a data plan and an operating system version 6.0 or higher
- Does not agree to install the study smartphone application onto their personal phone
- Does not agree to complete EMAs prompted by and completed through the study smartphone application
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Related Publications (8)
Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1994). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavorial medicine. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(3), 199-202. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/16.3.199
BACKGROUNDShiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2008;4:1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415.
PMID: 18509902BACKGROUNDJones A, Remmerswaal D, Verveer I, Robinson E, Franken IHA, Wen CKF, Field M. Compliance with ecological momentary assessment protocols in substance users: a meta-analysis. Addiction. 2019 Apr;114(4):609-619. doi: 10.1111/add.14503. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
PMID: 30461120BACKGROUNDRintala A, Wampers M, Myin-Germeys I, Viechtbauer W. Response compliance and predictors thereof in studies using the experience sampling method. Psychol Assess. 2019 Feb;31(2):226-235. doi: 10.1037/pas0000662. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
PMID: 30394762BACKGROUNDVachon H, Viechtbauer W, Rintala A, Myin-Germeys I. Compliance and Retention With the Experience Sampling Method Over the Continuum of Severe Mental Disorders: Meta-Analysis and Recommendations. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Dec 6;21(12):e14475. doi: 10.2196/14475.
PMID: 31808748BACKGROUNDFletcher DJ, Lewis SM, Matthews JN. Factorial designs for crossover clinical trials. Stat Med. 1990 Oct;9(10):1121-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780091002.
PMID: 2247713BACKGROUNDKezbers KM, Robertson MC, Hebert ET, Montgomery A, Businelle MS. Detecting Deception and Ensuring Data Integrity in a Nationwide mHealth Randomized Controlled Trial: Factorial Design Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 28;27:e66384. doi: 10.2196/66384.
PMID: 39874573DERIVEDBusinelle MS, Hebert ET, Shi D, Benson L, Kezbers KM, Tonkin S, Piper ME, Qian T. Investigating Best Practices for Ecological Momentary Assessment: Nationwide Factorial Experiment. J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 12;26:e50275. doi: 10.2196/50275.
PMID: 39133915DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2021
First Posted
January 18, 2022
Study Start
November 30, 2021
Primary Completion
October 26, 2022
Study Completion
October 26, 2022
Last Updated
January 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share