Assessment of Histologic Prognostic Factors in Peritoneal Malignant Mesothelioma
1 other identifier
observational
300
6 countries
6
Brief Summary
Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare neoplasm. The most common type, the epithelioid type, has been further divided into histological patterns of tubulo-papillary, acinar, adenomatoid, micropapillary, or solid. Its prognosis is improved by the use of a locoregional treatment combining extensive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), which increases survival up to 50 months. Histology is one of the most important prognostic variable that, forms the basis for treatment decisions. However, the prognostic of the epithelioid type varies greatly due to its tumor heterogeneity. It is therefore necessary to find prognostic factors of malignant epithelioid peritoneal mesothelioma in order to better define the therapeutic strategy. Among histological factors, solid growth, tumor necrosis, nuclear atypia, and mitotic count were found to be independent prognostic factors in epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma. However, in epithelioid malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (EMPM), these factors were studied in small and heterogeneous series in terms of histological growth and definitions used for histological factors. The present large study was conducted to investigate the prognostic impact of several histologic factors in EMPM. Their prognosis impacts were assessed using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in EMPM.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 28, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedJanuary 14, 2022
December 1, 2021
7 months
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Assessment of pronostic impact of nuclear grade in comparison with combined grade in peritoneal malignant mesothelioma
Assessment by the review of pathologists
3 months to 4 years
Study Arms (3)
peritoneal malignant mesothelioma of grade 1
peritoneal malignant mesothelioma of grade 1
peritoneal malignant mesothelioma of grade 2
peritoneal malignant mesothelioma of grade 2
peritoneal malignant mesothelioma of grade 3
peritoneal malignant mesothelioma of grade 3
Interventions
No intervention
Eligibility Criteria
squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx
You may qualify if:
- \- peritoneal malignant mesothelioma
You may not qualify if:
- opposition to reuse personnal data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
UZ Gent
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
University Hospital of Lyon
Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
Institut f. Pathologie und Neuropathologie
Tübingen, 72076, Germany
Zydus Hospitals
Ahmedabad, India
The Norwegian Radium Hospital
Oslo, N-0310, Norway
Fundação Champalimaud
Lisbon, 1400-038, Portugal
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 31, 2021
First Posted
January 14, 2022
Study Start
December 28, 2021
Primary Completion
July 15, 2022
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
January 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-12