Effectiveness of Kaltenborn Mobilizations Versus Muscle Energy Technique in Adhesive Capsulitis.

NCT05189626 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: 142/IREF/RMU/2021
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Total of 30 patients are selected according to inclusion criteria by convenient sampling and randomly allocated by sealed envelop method into two groups. Group 1 is treated with Muscle energy technique(Post isometric relaxation) and Group 2 is treated with Grade II,III Kaltenborn mobilizations and both groups also receives conventional therapy in form of Codman exercise and Wall ladder exercises.Data will be collected at baseline then after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks of intervention.

Conditions

Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder

Keywords

Adhesive Capsulitis,Mobilizations, muscle energy technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Shoulder pain and disability index

  Shoulder pain and disability index is used to measure pain and functional disability level. Total scores range from 0 to 130 with a percentage score of 0 indicating less shoulder disability and 100 indicating more shoulder dysfunction

  4 weeks

• Universal goniometer

  universal goniometer is used to measure shoulder range of motion.

  4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Group A

EXPERIMENTAL

Muscle energy technique

Other: Muscle energy technique

Group B

EXPERIMENTAL

Kaltonborn mobilizations

Other: Kaltonborn mobilizations

Interventions

Muscle energy technique OTHER

Post Isometric relaxation(muscle energy technique) 3 days/ week for 4 weeks

Group A

Kaltonborn mobilizations OTHER

Kaltonborn mobilizations grade II and III will be performed on Glenohumeral joints 3 days/ week for 4 weeks.

Group B

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 20 Years - 60 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Age between 20 and 60 years.
• Duration of complaint for more than 3 months.
• Gender: Both Male and Female.
• Patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder
• Patients having restriction in more than 2 ranges
• Patients with diabetes

You may not qualify if:

• Shoulder dislocation, fracture or labral tear.
• Shoulder girdle motor control deficit associated with neurological disorder.
• Any bony deformities acquired or congenital in glenohumeral joint.
• Patients with language barrier.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Health Education Research Foundation (HERF): lead

Study Sites (1)

Holy family hospital

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 4400, Pakistan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bursitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint Diseases; Musculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

• Aqsa Anwar, DPT

  Rawalpindi Medical College

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Waqar Ahmed Awan, PhD

CONTACT

+923335348846; president@herf.org.pk

Waqar Ahmed Awan, PhD

CONTACT

+923335348846; ce@trjournal.org

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
• Masking Details: It is a single blinded study.
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Model Details: There are two groups Group 1 and 2.Group 1 is treated with Muscle energy techniques and Group 2 is treated with kaltenborn mobilizations for 30 minutes per session,3 days per week for 4 weeks.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: December 11, 2021
• First Posted: January 12, 2022
• Study Start: December 6, 2021
• Primary Completion: March 31, 2022
• Study Completion: March 31, 2022
• Last Updated: January 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Locations

PA (1)