Comparative Study Between Two Different Approaches of Brachial Plexus Block: Supraclavicular Approach and Retroclavicular Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study investigators will compare two different approaches of brachial plexus block ;supraclavicular approach and retroclavicular approach regarding success rate, duration of block, complications
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 12, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 5, 2022
CompletedSeptember 8, 2022
September 1, 2022
8 months
November 28, 2021
September 4, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Block success rate
Investigator will compare success rate of both types of block and which one is more likely to be successfully administrated
one year
Complications
Investigators will compare complications like pneumothorax,nerve injury,bleeding and which one is more likely to cause complications
one year
Duration of sensory and motor blockade
Time which each procedure will take to block sensory and motor stimuli
one year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Duration of procedure
one year
Number of needle passes
one year
Study Arms (2)
Supraclavicular approach group
ACTIVE COMPARATORprobe placed firmly over the supraclavicular fossa, parallel to the clavicle to obtain a short-axis view of the divisions of the brachial plexus and the subclavian artery, lying on the first rib After skin infiltration with lidocaine 2% a 23-gauge 70mm block needle inserted in-plane with the ultrasound beam, in a lateral-to-medial direction, until the needle tip's positioned at the junction of the first rib and subclavian artery
Retroclavicular approach group
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe probe will be placed below and perpendicular to the clavicle, in a paramedian sagittal plane, medial to the coracoid process, to obtain a short-axis view of the cords of the brachial plexus and the axillary vessels. The needle will be then inserted in the supraclavicular fossa, approximately 1 cm posteriorly to the clavicle, and advanced in plane and strictly parallel to the ultrasound transducer. After passing the initial blind zone of about 2 cm caused by the acoustic shadow of the clavicle, the needle tip is constantly seen, until it is positioned posterior to the axillary artery
Interventions
group will receive brachial plexus block above clavicle,Injection of anaesthetic will be done in brachial plexus around subclavian artery
group will receive brachial plexus block inferior to the clavicle,injection of anaesthetic will be done around axillary artery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients doing distal arm surgery, elective , 18 to 60 years old , will be included in double blinded randomized study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal .
- local infection or deformity at the block site.
- Patient with significant neurological , psychiatric or neuromuscular disease.
- Pregnancy or lactating women .
- Coagulopathy .
- Morbid obesity .
- History of allergy to local anaesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sohag Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Sohag University Hospital
Sohag, Egypt
Related Publications (4)
Albrecht E, Mermoud J, Fournier N, Kern C, Kirkham KR. A systematic review of ultrasound-guided methods for brachial plexus blockade. Anaesthesia. 2016 Feb;71(2):213-27. doi: 10.1111/anae.13347. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
PMID: 26670119BACKGROUNDYazer MS, Finlayson RJ, Tran DQ. A randomized comparison between infraclavicular block and targeted intracluster injection supraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):11-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000193.
PMID: 25478758BACKGROUNDCharbonneau J, Frechette Y, Sansoucy Y, Echave P. The Ultrasound-Guided Retroclavicular Block: A Prospective Feasibility Study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Sep-Oct;40(5):605-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000284.
PMID: 26222346BACKGROUNDGrape S, Pawa A, Weber E, Albrecht E. Retroclavicular vs supraclavicular brachial plexus block for distal upper limb surgery: a randomised, controlled, single-blinded trial. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):518-524. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.022. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
PMID: 30857608BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- resident doctor at anasthesia department sohag university hospital
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 28, 2021
First Posted
January 12, 2022
Study Start
January 5, 2022
Primary Completion
September 5, 2022
Study Completion
September 5, 2022
Last Updated
September 8, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share