Use of Socially Assistive Robots for Long Term Care Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment and Apathy
Impact of a Novel Socially Assistive Robotic Architecture on Engaging Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia in Long Term Care Settings
2 other identifiers
interventional
142
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to demonstrate the impact of a socially assistive robot system on reducing apathy among cognitively impaired older adults residing in long term care facilities. Earlier phases of this project demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of the robotic system. First, investigators will improve the social robotic interaction architecture through additional software development, enhance its versatility, and make it easy for non-experts to run. Second, 188 participants will be randomized to either usual activity programs at the long term care facility, or the usual activity programs plus the robotic activities. Researchers will examine the effect on apathy and also plan on examining underlying individual and facility factors that influence the impact of the robotic activities.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 alzheimer-disease
Started Feb 2023
Longer than P75 for phase_1 alzheimer-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2026
CompletedMay 8, 2026
May 1, 2026
2.7 years
December 15, 2021
May 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Apathy
Apathy Evaluation Scale - Clinician (AES-C) will be used to assess changes in composite apathy score from baseline, Week 4, and Week 8. The AES-C is a validated 18-item instrument used to assess cognitive, behavioral, emotional and other symptoms of apathy. Clinicians rate each item based on verbal and nonverbal information provided by the participant. Item scores range from 1 (not at all characteristic) to 4 (a lot characteristic). Total scores range from 18 to 72 where higher derived scores indicate greater apathy.
Baseline to Week 8
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in Trail Making Test (TMT)
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Animal Fluency Test
Baseline to Week 8
Study Arms (2)
Socially Assistive Robot Activity
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will attend two sessions per week and interact with the robot. Four weeks with a humanoid robot and four weeks with a dog robot. Participants can continue to join other activities held within the facility.
Usual Activity Program
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will attend at least two sessions per week at activities held within the facility. They will not be exposed to the robot activities.
Interventions
Participants will attend two weekly sessions with robot activities. Each session will last 30 minutes. Participants will attend robot sessions for 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Residing \>3 months in long term care facility
- Evidence of mild cognitive impairment (SAGE score 15-16), mild dementia (SAGE score \<15, AD8\<2, DSRD\<19), or moderate dementia (SAGE \<15, AD8\>1, DSRD 19-36)
- Symptoms of apathy (Score 30+ on AES-C)
You may not qualify if:
- Severe cognitive impairment
- Physically unable to participate
- Unable to provide assent
- Uncorrected vision or hearing
- Never spoke English
- Unable to sit comfortably in chair
- Acutely ill, terminally ill or unresponsive
- Unable to be moved to activity location
- Aggressive or combative
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Vanderbilt Universitylead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212-2010, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ghosh R, Khan N, Migovich M, Tate JA, Maxwell CA, Newhouse PA, Scharre DW, Tan A, Mion LC, Sarkar N. Engaging Older Adults and Staff in the Co-Design and Evaluation of Socially Assistive Robot and Virtual Reality Activities for Long-Term Care: User-Centered Study. JMIR Aging. 2025 Dec 2;8:e75288. doi: 10.2196/75288.
PMID: 41330571DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Trained research assistants separate from other research personnel will collect outcomes; these research personnel will be blinded to the hypotheses and group assignments.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- David K. Wilson Professor of Engineering
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2021
First Posted
January 5, 2022
Study Start
February 7, 2023
Primary Completion
October 31, 2025
Study Completion
January 31, 2026
Last Updated
May 8, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 12 months after publications
All IPD that are de-identified and have been used in publications.