Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 Treated With HFNO and Prone Positioning
AW-PP_Covid
1 other identifier
observational
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A subset of patients with COVID-19 develops acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (1). The use of invasive mechanical ventilation for the treatment of these conditions is associated with high mortality rates (2,3). The use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) and awake prone position (AW-PP) could to decrease the need for endotracheal intubation and other adverse clinical outcomes (4-6). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of the simultaneous application of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy HFNO and awake-prone position in a cohort of patients with severe respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 on relevant clinical outcomes, and to assess risk factors of treatment failure defined as requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 5, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedJanuary 27, 2026
December 1, 2022
1.7 years
December 23, 2021
January 23, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Endotracheal Intubation
Requirement of endotracheal intubation according to the criteria of previous studies (9,10).
Up to 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
In-hospital mortality.
Up to 24 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
We included patients older than 17 years admitted to the ICU with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (real-time PCR) and receiving HFNO for at least 4 hours. Patients received HFNO when any of the following criteria were present: a) peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) \< 92% with oxygen \> 4 liters/minute; b) increased work of breathing with use of accessory respiratory muscles, and a respiratory rate \> 30/min; c) PaO2/FiO2ratio \< 200 mmHg. Patients with respiratory failure secondary to a different etiology, decreased level of consciousness, presence of shock requiring vasopressors, immediate need for intubation, use of positive-pressure ventilation prior to HFNO, and with do-not intubate orders were excluded.
You may qualify if:
- Older than 17 years, admitted to the ICU
- Confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (real-time PCR)
- Receiving HFNO for at least 4 hours. Patients received HFNO when any of the following criteria were present: peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) \< 92% with oxygen \> 4 liters/minute; increased work of breathing with use of accessory respiratory muscles, and a respiratory rate \> 30/min; PaO2/FiO2ratio \< 200 mmHg.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with respiratory failure secondary to a different etiology,
- Decreased level of consciousness,
- Presence of shock requiring vasopressors,
- Immediate need for intubation.
- Use of positive-pressure ventilation prior to HFNO, and f) with do-not intubate orders.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Austral University, Argentinacollaborator
- Hospital Privado de Comunidad de Mar del Platalead
- Hospital Alemancollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mariano Esperatti
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, 7600, Argentina
Related Publications (12)
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.
PMID: 32091533RESULTKaragiannidis C, Mostert C, Hentschker C, Voshaar T, Malzahn J, Schillinger G, Klauber J, Janssens U, Marx G, Weber-Carstens S, Kluge S, Pfeifer M, Grabenhenrich L, Welte T, Busse R. Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):853-862. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30316-7. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
PMID: 32735842RESULTRanzani OT, Bastos LSL, Gelli JGM, Marchesi JF, Baiao F, Hamacher S, Bozza FA. Characterisation of the first 250,000 hospital admissions for COVID-19 in Brazil: a retrospective analysis of nationwide data. Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):407-418. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30560-9. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
PMID: 33460571RESULTTan W, Xu DY, Xu MJ, Wang ZF, Dai B, Li LL, Zhao HW, Wang W, Kang J. The efficacy and tolerance of prone positioning in non-intubation patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS: a meta-analysis. Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;15:17534666211009407. doi: 10.1177/17534666211009407.
PMID: 33888007RESULTPonnapa Reddy M, Subramaniam A, Afroz A, Billah B, Lim ZJ, Zubarev A, Blecher G, Tiruvoipati R, Ramanathan K, Wong SN, Brodie D, Fan E, Shekar K. Prone Positioning of Nonintubated Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 1;49(10):e1001-e1014. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005086.
PMID: 33927120RESULTCardona S, Downing J, Alfalasi R, Bzhilyanskaya V, Milzman D, Rehan M, Schwartz B, Yardi I, Yazdanpanah F, Tran QK. Intubation rate of patients with hypoxia due to COVID-19 treated with awake proning: A meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 May;43:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.01.058. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
PMID: 33550104RESULTRoca O, Caralt B, Messika J, Samper M, Sztrymf B, Hernandez G, Garcia-de-Acilu M, Frat JP, Masclans JR, Ricard JD. An Index Combining Respiratory Rate and Oxygenation to Predict Outcome of Nasal High-Flow Therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun 1;199(11):1368-1376. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0589OC.
PMID: 30576221RESULTFrancone M, Iafrate F, Masci GM, Coco S, Cilia F, Manganaro L, Panebianco V, Andreoli C, Colaiacomo MC, Zingaropoli MA, Ciardi MR, Mastroianni CM, Pugliese F, Alessandri F, Turriziani O, Ricci P, Catalano C. Chest CT score in COVID-19 patients: correlation with disease severity and short-term prognosis. Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6808-6817. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07033-y. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
PMID: 32623505RESULTFrat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, Prat G, Boulain T, Morawiec E, Cottereau A, Devaquet J, Nseir S, Razazi K, Mira JP, Argaud L, Chakarian JC, Ricard JD, Wittebole X, Chevalier S, Herbland A, Fartoukh M, Constantin JM, Tonnelier JM, Pierrot M, Mathonnet A, Beduneau G, Deletage-Metreau C, Richard JC, Brochard L, Robert R; FLORALI Study Group; REVA Network. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2185-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503326. Epub 2015 May 17.
PMID: 25981908RESULTGrieco DL, Menga LS, Cesarano M, Rosa T, Spadaro S, Bitondo MM, Montomoli J, Falo G, Tonetti T, Cutuli SL, Pintaudi G, Tanzarella ES, Piervincenzi E, Bongiovanni F, Dell'Anna AM, Delle Cese L, Berardi C, Carelli S, Bocci MG, Montini L, Bello G, Natalini D, De Pascale G, Velardo M, Volta CA, Ranieri VM, Conti G, Maggiore SM, Antonelli M; COVID-ICU Gemelli Study Group. Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The HENIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1731-1743. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4682.
PMID: 33764378RESULTOlmos M, Fuentes N, Busico M, Gallardo A, Vitali A, Costa ELV, Amato MBP, Bruhn A, Esperatti M; Argentine Collaborative Group on High Flow, Prone Positioning. Effectiveness of bundle of care on tolerance of awake-prone positioning in patients with acute respiratory failure. A multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med. 2025 Feb;51(2):332-341. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-07804-5. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
PMID: 39961842DERIVEDBusico M, Fuentes NA, Gallardo A, Vitali A, Quintana J, Olmos M, Burns KEA, Esperatti M; Argentine Collaborative Group on High Flow and Prone Positioning. The Predictive Validity of the Berlin Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome for Patients With COVID-19-Related Respiratory Failure Treated With High-Flow Nasal Oxygen: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;52(1):92-101. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006056. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
PMID: 37846935DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 4 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Mariano Esperatti, MD, PhD. Head of Section. Intensive Care Department. Hospital Privado de Comunidad. Mar del Plata. Argentina
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 23, 2021
First Posted
January 5, 2022
Study Start
April 15, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
January 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2022-12