NCT05177341

Brief Summary

Amputation is a problem that can be encountered for many reasons, can cause functional disability in varying severities and puts a multifaceted financial burden on individuals, society, and states. The phantom feeling is the state of the sensory sensation of a limb that does not already exist and is observed in various forms in individuals with amputation. The aim of this project is to investigate whether the phantom sensation affects autocorrelation of gait in unilateral amputated individuals and thus to determine whether the phantom sensation is a functional sensation that affects the multifaceted nature of gait. In addition, the measurement of whether phantom sensation contributes to the ability of amputees to adapt to changing conditions and obtaining a unique calculation method that determines autocorrelation are other specific aspects of the study. The study will be conducted on individuals with unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation who have acceptable phantom sensation, individuals with no-phantom sensation and healthy individuals. Individuals who meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the gait assessment. During the evaluation, at least 512 consecutive steps will be collected from each individual when walking on the treadmill at their preferred speed. The walk test will then be repeated on the perturbation treadmill of 5-10%. It will be determined whether the gait characteristics obtained by gait analysis show autocorrelation by using signal processing methods.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 15, 2021

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2022

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 4, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

January 4, 2022

Status Verified

December 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 15, 2021

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

AmputationPhantom SensationGaitAutocorrelation Function

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Gait Analysis on Flat Ground

    In order to collect the data required for the autocorrelation calculation in flat walking, the subject will be placed on the treadmill (REAX RUN) and he or she will be asked to continue his walking at the "preferred speed" level obtained with the previous protocol, until at least 512 steps are collected. This walk is expected to take 3-4 minutes in total. After a sufficient number of steps is reached, the treadmill will be gradually slowed down and stopped. Afterward, the individual will be taken to rest again.

    5 minutes after the protocol for determining the preferred walking speed

  • Gait analysis on Perturbed Ground

    After the resting period is terminated, the individual will start walking at the speed determined according to the Hinton protocol on the treadmill (REAX RUN) for gait analysis again. During the second walk, 5-10% perturbation will be given on the treadmill until 512 steps are collected. The autocorrelation analysis to be performed with the data taken during walking on the perturbed ground will measure the adaptability of the individual's gait to changing conditions. The data of the walk will be automatically saved on the system computer. Whether the autocorrelation feature of the gait is observed or not will be calculated mathematically using signal processing methods.

    5 minutes after walking on the flat ground

Study Arms (3)

Amputees with acceptable phantom sensation

Other: Determining Preferred Walking Speed

Amputees with no phantom sensation

Other: Determining Preferred Walking Speed

Control group

Other: Determining Preferred Walking Speed

Interventions

In the beginning, sensors of the gait analysis system (RehaGait®), which can record the time-distance characteristics of consecutive multiple steps (step length, step width, double step length, and timing information, etc.) will be installed. The 7 sensors of this system are attached to the shoes of the individual, proximal to the ankle, distal thigh, and sacroiliac joint level (Aminian et al., 2014). Individuals will be required to wear casual athletic shoes and comfortable, non-knee-covering shorts. Next; Each individual will walk freely on the treadmill at their own pace. To find the preferred walking speed of the individual, Hinton et al. protocol will be used (Hinton et al., 2018). The speed of the treadmill will be increased or decreased in line with the direction of the participants. After being determined according to the protocol, the individual will practice walking at this speed for 4-5 minutes. The individual will rest as much as he or she wants.

Amputees with acceptable phantom sensationAmputees with no phantom sensationControl group

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Traumatic transtibial amputees or age and gender matched healthy individuals

You may qualify if:

  • Having an acceptable (non-irritating) phantom sensation that persists throughout the day, even if the severity is variable
  • Having unilateral below-knee amputation due to trauma
  • Using OttoBock® prosthesis with dynamic foot component, silicone liner design and active vacuum system: The reason for choosing this prosthesis; This is because it is a prosthesis documented in the literature, with the highest standards of use in today's conditions, the most preferred in the international platform, used in research, and advantageous for use in daily life. Thus, deficiencies that may arise from the design of the prosthesis will not be encountered.
  • At least 2 years have passed since amputation surgery
  • Using the last prosthesis for at least 6 months for at least 6-8 hours a day
  • Being within the limits of body mass index (weight/height2: 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) accepted as normal by the World Health Organization
  • Having the ability to speak and understand Turkish
  • Not having any balance and coordination difficulties that can be observed with clinical functional tests
  • Not having any joint contracture or muscle shortness that may affect walking ability
  • Agree to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Undergoing amputation surgery for non-traumatic reasons
  • Having multiple amputations
  • To be followed up with any medical pre-diagnosis (orthopedic, neurological, cardiovascular, psychiatric, etc.)
  • To be followed up with any medical diagnosis (orthopedic, neurological, cardiovascular, psychiatric, etc.)
  • Being on medication during the research
  • Having consumed alcohol in the last 48 hours
  • Taking painkillers in the last 48 hours
  • Having a history of surgery and acute trauma in the last 6 months
  • Having a history of falling in the last 1 year
  • Loss of sensation in the remaining limb (stump) after amputation
  • Having a disturbing phantom feeling
  • Having any chronic and/or acute pain, including phantom pain and stump pain
  • Observing any shortness, contracture or balance problems in the pre-tests
  • Having unilateral below-knee amputation due to trauma
  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • +30 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (2)

  • Hinton DC, Cheng YY, Paquette C. Everyday multitasking habits: University students seamlessly text and walk on a split-belt treadmill. Gait Posture. 2018 Jan;59:168-173. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 7.

    PMID: 29032000BACKGROUND
  • Aminian K, Dadashi F, Mariani B, Lenoble-Hoskovec C, Santos-Eggimann B, Büla CJ. Gait analysis using shoe-worn inertial sensors: how is foot clearance related to walking speed? Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 2014; 481-485.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Amputation, TraumaticPhantom Limb

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and InjuriesPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPain, PostoperativePostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsPain

Central Study Contacts

Hilal Keklicek, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD, Assoc Prof

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2021

First Posted

January 4, 2022

Study Start

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 1, 2022

Study Completion

September 1, 2022

Last Updated

January 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2021-12