A Comparıson of in People Wıth and Wıthout Non-Specıfıc Low Back Paın
A Comparıson of Functıonal Movemenet Screen, Physıcal Capacıty, Core Endurance, and Spınal Mobılıty in People Wıth and Wıthout Non-Specıfıc Low Back Paın
1 other identifier
observational
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Non-Specific Low Back Pain (NSLBP), which constitutes approximately 90-95% of low back pain, is low back pain that cannot be defined by specific pathologies such as infection, tumor, osteoporosis, fracture, radicular symptoms or inflammatory diseases. NSLBP creates many health problems due to uncertainties in both its diagnosis and treatment. Due to the health problems and decreased functional activities of the individual, it creates a socioeconomic burden on both the individual and the country. NSLBP ranks 6th in the distribution of the economic burden caused by diseases to developed and developing societies. It is difficult to calculate how much burden it puts on the country's economy both directly (health institutions) and indirectly (loss of working days). However, in 1996 in the United States (USA), the economic burden of NSLBP patients is estimated to be between 18.5 and 28.2 million.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2022
CompletedJuly 21, 2022
July 1, 2022
5 months
December 13, 2021
July 20, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Functional Movement Screening (FMS) (Functional Movement Patterns)
FMS will be used to evaluate the quality of 7 functional movement patterns with the goal of identifying movement limitations and asymmetries. The FMS consists of 7 individual test items including the deep squat, in-line lunge, hurdle step, shoulder flexibility, push-up, straight leg raise, and rotary trunk stability assessment. Each of these 7 test items is graded on a scale of 0-3; thus, the lowest and highest possible overall FMS scores are 0 and 21, respectively.
1 day
Spinal Mobility
Spinal mobility will be measured with a computer-assisted portable electromechanical device (the Spinal Mouse System, Idiag, Fejraltorf, Switzerland). Measurements will be made with the participant's back naked. Spinous processes between C7 and S3 of the individual will be marked before spinal mouse measurement is made. The C7 spinous process is located between the two rounds of the spinal mouse. It will go down to the S3 vertebra with a speed of 6.7 cm/sec, which measures without disturbing the patient's position. Then, the same measurements will be made between the C7 spinous process and the S3 spinous process while the person is in the position of maximum flexion, extension and right-left lateral flexion.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Oswetry Disability Index
1 day.
Functional Reach Test
1 day.
Two Minutes Step Test
1 day.
Time Up and Go Test
1 day.
The Trunk Flexor Endurance Test
1 day
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
With Non- Spesific Low Back Pain
FMS, Spinal mobility, Core Endurance, Physical Capacity.
Without Non- Spesific Low Back Pain
FMS, Spinal mobility, Core Endurance, Physical Capacity.
Interventions
Due to the difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment of NSLBP, it has been causing many problems such as limitation of activation, socioeconomic burden, and biopsychosocial factors for years. It is thought that the effectiveness of treatment will increase if the needs and problems of individuals with NSLBP are clearly revealed beforehand. Although there are studies on core endurance and physical capacities in individuals with NSLBP in the literature, the number of studies examining functional movement analysis and spinal mobility in individuals with NSLBP is very few. Therefore, aim of this research is to compare functional movement analysis, physical capacity, core endurance, and spinal mobility in individuals with and without NSLBP. With the results we will reveal, we aim to contribute to the evaluation and treatment of patients with NSLBP. Thus, the negative effects of this pathology, which causes serious labor and financial losses, can be minimized.
Eligibility Criteria
18-65, • having pain between the last rib and inferior gluteal region more than 3 months
You may qualify if:
- Being between the ages of 18-65,
- getting more than 24 points in the minimental test,
- having pain between the last rib and inferior gluteal region,
- being diagnosed with NSLBP, presence of low back pain for more than 3 months, -volunteering to participate in the study.
- Being between the ages of 18-65,
- getting over 24 points in the minimental test,
- not having low back pain in the last 3 months,
- volunteering to participate in the study were determined.
You may not qualify if:
- uncontrollable hypertension and heart disease,
- uncontrollable neurological and metabolic disease,
- trauma history in the last 6 months,
- serious musculoskeletal problem and other pathology that may adversely affect balance,
- severe mental involvement, lower extremity amputation,
- presence of nerve pressure, non-voluntary
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beykent University
Istanbul, Beylikdüzü, 34100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Ahmadi H, Adib H, Selk-Ghaffari M, Shafizad M, Moradi S, Madani Z, Partovi G, Mahmoodi A. Comparison of the effects of the Feldenkrais method versus core stability exercise in the management of chronic low back pain: a randomised control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Dec;34(12):1449-1457. doi: 10.1177/0269215520947069. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
PMID: 32723088BACKGROUNDKellis E, Adamou G, Tzilios G, Emmanouilidou M. Reliability of spinal range of motion in healthy boys using a skin-surface device. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Oct;31(8):570-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.09.001.
PMID: 18984239BACKGROUNDVachalathiti R, Sakulsriprasert P, Kingcha P. Decreased Functional Capacity in Individuals with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study. J Pain Res. 2020 Aug 5;13:1979-1986. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S260875. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32801853BACKGROUNDCook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;1(2):62-72.
PMID: 21522216BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2021
First Posted
December 30, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 1, 2022
Last Updated
July 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07