Complications Associated With Primary Placement of Gastrostomy for Feeding
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare pain, complications, and quality of life after gastrostomy tube is placed by either percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or radiologically-inserted gastrostomy (RIG) method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 29, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2021
CompletedJanuary 11, 2023
January 1, 2023
3.6 years
November 29, 2021
January 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in pain with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Trajectory of the average pain score over time (question 3, Cleeland Brief Pain Inventory), which rates average pain in the past 24 hours, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bad as can be imagined
Before the procedure, within 24 hours after procedure, at 48-96 hours after procedure, and at 6 weeks after procedure
Major and minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Assessment of the following major complications after procedure: Peritonitis, Abscess, Major bleeding requiring intervention and/or transfusion, Bowel perforation, Death; Assessment of the following minor complications after procedure: Minor bleeding, not requiring transfusion, Tube occluded, Tube malpositioned/fell out,Tube damaged, Skin erosion, Site redness, Site nodules/induration, Site exudate
Within 24 hours after procedure
Major and minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Assessment of the following major complications after procedure: Peritonitis, Abscess, Major bleeding requiring intervention and/or transfusion, Bowel perforation, Death; Assessment of the following minor complications after procedure: Minor bleeding, not requiring transfusion, Tube occluded, Tube malpositioned/fell out,Tube damaged, Skin erosion, Site redness, Site nodules/induration, Site exudate
At 6 weeks after procedure
Minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Assessment of the following complications after procedure: Tube occluded, Tube malpositioned/fell out, Tube damaged, Skin erosion, Site redness, Site nodules/induration, Site exudate
At 3 months, if tube still in place
Minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Assessment of the following complications after procedure: Tube occluded, Tube malpositioned/fell out, Tube damaged, Skin erosion, Site redness, Site nodules/induration, Site exudate
At 6 months, if tube still in place
Minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Assessment of the following complications after procedure: Tube occluded, Tube malpositioned/fell out, Tube damaged, Skin erosion, Site redness, Site nodules/induration, Site exudate
At 9 months, if tube still in place
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Costs associated with gastrostomy tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Immediately after procedure completion
Anesthesia type associated with gastrostomy tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Immediately after procedure completion
Patient quality of life associated with gastrostomy tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG, before and after the procedure
Before the procedure
Patient quality of life associated with gastrostomy tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG, before and after the procedure
At 6 weeks after procedure
Study Arms (2)
PEG Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will gastrostomy tube placement via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) method.
RIG Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects will have the placement of a gastrostomy tube via radiologically-inserted gastrostomy (RIG) method.
Interventions
Gastrostomy tube placement using an endoscopic camera inserted via the mouth into the stomach to place the tube.
Gastrostomy tube placement using a temporary nasogastric tube placed from nose to stomach and fluoroscopy (x-rays).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years
- Cannot maintain adequate nutrition by mouth
You may not qualify if:
- Venting-only gastrostomy
- Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
- Coagulopathy with uncorrectable International Normalized Ratio (INR) greater than 1.5 or inability to hold anticoagulation
- Structural abnormality that would prevent one or both techniques
- Known severe esophageal stricture
- Obstructing malignancy in oropharynx or esophagus that prohibits pull-through technique
- Neoplastic, inflammatory, or infiltrative disease of abdominal wall or gastric wall
- Known hepatomegaly
- Abdominal wall mesh
- Enteric functional abnormality
- Small bowel or colonic obstruction
- Gastric or small bowel dysmotility
- Active abdominal infection/peritonitis/enterocutaneous fistula
- Ascites
- Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Melissa Neisen, MD
Mayo Clinic
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants are randomized to receive either RIG or PEG. Investigator and Outcomes Assessors are masked.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 29, 2021
First Posted
December 30, 2021
Study Start
December 8, 2017
Primary Completion
July 29, 2021
Study Completion
July 29, 2021
Last Updated
January 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01