Evaluation of Electronic Portal Messaging and Embedded Asynchronous Care on Physician-Assisted Smoking Quit Attempts
A Quality Improvement Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate Electronic Portal Messaging, Embedded Asynchronous Care and Physician Versus System as Message Sender on Physician-Assisted Smoking Quit Attempts of Primary Care, Adult Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Among 10 PCPs, 200 adult smokers with an active patient portal who had been seen by a PCP within 12 months were randomly selected and randomly assigned to one of four conditions to compare the quit attempts of patients sent electronic outreach with and without asynchronous care link and to compare the quit attempts of patients who recieved the portal message from PCP or the health system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 13, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 24, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2021
CompletedDecember 29, 2021
December 1, 2021
1 month
November 30, 2021
December 28, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Smoking Quit Attempt
Smoking Quit Attempt documented in the EMR
30 days after intervention
Other Outcomes (1)
Physician Perceptions of Electronic Outreach Intervention
6 months after intervention
Study Arms (4)
Message Type PNSL: Physician sender, No Survey Link
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, the Physician is message sender and the message does not include a link to a survey that initiates asynchronous care.
Message Type PSL: Physician sender, Survey Link
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, the Physician is message sender and the message does include a link to a survey that initiates asynchronous care.
Message Type SNSL: System sender, No Survey Link
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, the Health System is message sender and the message does not include a link to a survey that initiates asynchronous care.
Message Type SSL: System sender, Survey Link
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this arm, the Health System is message sender and the message does include a link to a survey that initiates asynchronous care.
Interventions
PCPs sent a portal message encouraging a quit attempt embedded a link to asynchronous care within a portal message encouraging a quit attempt in order to compare EMR-documented, physician-assisted quit attempts to those who received messages without the link 30 days after messages were sent.
Physician sent a portal message encouraging a quit attempt without a link to asynchronous care within a portal message encouraging a quit attempt in order to compare EMR-documented, physician-assisted quit attempts to those who received messages without the link 30 days after messages were sent.
Health System sent a portal message encouraging a quit attempt embedded a link to asynchronous care within a portal message encouraging a quit attempt in order to compare EMR-documented, physician-assisted quit attempts to those who received messages without the link 30 days after messages were sent.
Health System sent a portal message encouraging a quit attempt without a link to asynchronous care within a portal message encouraging a quit attempt in order to compare EMR-documented, physician-assisted quit attempts to those who received messages without the link 30 days after messages were sent. Half of the messages came from the patient's PCP and the other half came from the health system to determine if communication from a patient's physician was associated with more quit attempts.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 18 years and older who were designated as a smoker in the EHR who had at least one face-to-face visit with their PCP in the prior 12 months and had a patient portal account
- To ensure equal representation across the 10 physicians, we randomly selected 20 patients under each physician to serve in the sample.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded if they no longer see the PCP, had a diagnosis for which the outreach program would be insensitive (e.g., lung cancer), previously expressed not wanting smoking cessation counseling, or were no longer a smoker.
- (Patients were post-hoc excluded if EHR indicated that they had received smoking cessation treatment 60 days prior to portal message intervention.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74107, United States
Related Publications (1)
Erdmann M, Edwards B, Adewumi MT. Effect of Electronic Portal Messaging With Embedded Asynchronous Care on Physician-Assisted Smoking Cessation Attempts: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e220348. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.0348.
PMID: 35226082DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marjorie A Erdmann, MS
Oklahoma State University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants: The patients were not informed of other portal messages. The portal message they received (if it had a link to asynchronous care or not and if it was sent by physician or system) was determined by random assignment. Care Providers: After reviewing patients for exclusion criteria, the physicians were not informed which intervention group patients were assigned. They knew who was selected for the study and then those patients were randomly assigned to intervention groups by computerized randomization system. Investigators: The data was extracted from the EHR and de-identified prior to sharing it with the investigators. Therefore, the investigators were blind to patients and patient assignment. Outcomes Assessor: Outcomes were assessed only from de-identified data.
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2021
First Posted
December 29, 2021
Study Start
January 13, 2020
Primary Completion
February 24, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
December 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share