Treatment Time Comparing Digital & Conventional Workflows
Comparison of Treatment Time Between Digital and Conventional Workflows for Treatment With Posterior Implant Restorations
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) analyzed monolithic single-unit implant restorations out of lithium disilicate (LS2) or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICN) in a chairside digital workflow (Test) and a conventional protocol (Control). The primary outcome was to investigate the treatment time of the overall operation. The null hypothesis of this RCT was that both workflows had comparable results with respect to the defined outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2021
CompletedDecember 21, 2021
December 1, 2021
1.3 years
November 22, 2021
December 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treatment time
Treatment time in every steps were recorded.
First visit to prosthesis delivery visit, through study completion, an average of 1 month
Study Arms (2)
Workflows
EXPERIMENTALDigital and conventional workflows for treatment of implant single crowns
Materials
EXPERIMENTALMaterials for treatment of implant single crowns (polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks, PICNs and lithium disilicate, LS2).
Interventions
Digital or Conventional Workflows for treatment of implant single crown and materials used.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The participants having a transmucosal implant system (Straumann TL RN/WN, Institut Straumann, AG, Basel, Switzerland) were placed in a single-tooth gap in the area of premolar or molar regions in the maxilla and mandible with existing interproximal and antagonist contacts.
- general medical health is healthy or has a well-controlled systemic disease.
- general oral health has shown no sign of infection or unsuccessfully treated diseases such as chronic periodontitis.
You may not qualify if:
- smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day.
- pregnancy.
- psychiatric disorder
- history of radiation therapy at the head and neck area.
- history of chemotherapy.
- history of bony pathologies such as osseous dysplasia, odontogenic cyst or tumor, etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mahidol Universitylead
- Align Technology, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of dentistry, Mahidol University
Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
Related Publications (1)
Joda T, Bragger U. Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015 Sep-Oct;30(5):1047-53. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3963.
PMID: 26394340BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2021
First Posted
December 21, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2020
Primary Completion
October 26, 2021
Study Completion
October 26, 2021
Last Updated
December 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share