Analysis the Positive Rate of Tumor Markers Among Physical Examination Population
Analysis the Positive Status of Tumor Markers Among Physical Examination Population in a Tertiary Grade A Class Hospital
1 other identifier
observational
26,891
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To analyze the positive rate of tumor markers (TM) among health examination population in a tertiary grade A class hospital, compare the differences between different age and sex groups, and explore the possible influencing factors of TM positive.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2021
CompletedDecember 21, 2021
September 1, 2021
12 months
October 20, 2021
December 6, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
the positive rate of carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA)
The proportion of abnormal CEA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CEA≤5 ng/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of α-fetoprotein(AFP)
The proportion of abnormal AFP in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : AFP≤20 ng/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9)
The proportion of abnormal CA 19-9 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 19-9≤39 U/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 125(CA 125)
The proportion of abnormal CA 125 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 125≤35 U/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 72-4(CA 72-4)
The proportion of abnormal CA 72-4 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 72-4≤8.2 U/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 15-3(CA 15-3)
The proportion of abnormal CA 15-3 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value : CA 15-3≤25 IU/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of carbohydrate antigen 242(CA 242)
The proportion of abnormal CA 242 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :CA 242≤20 U/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC)
The proportion of abnormal SCC in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :SCC≤1.5 ng/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of Cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1(CYFRA21-1)
The proportion of abnormal CYFRA21-1 in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :CYFRA21-1≤3.3 ng/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of total prostate-specific antigen( TPSA)
The proportion of abnormal TPSA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :TPSA≤4 ng/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of free prostate-specific antigen( FPSA)
The proportion of abnormal FPSA in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :FPSA≤1 ng/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the positive rate of neuron specific enolase( NSE)
The proportion of abnormal NSE in physical examination population was calculated. The range of normal value :NSE≤17 ng/mL.
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
Secondary Outcomes (11)
age
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of systolic blood pressure (SBP)
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of diastolic blood pressure (DBP)
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of fasting bood glucose (FBG)
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
the measured value of total cholesterol (TC)
2019.01.01-2019.12.31
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
physical examination population
From January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
rom January 2019 to December 2019, who underwent physical examination in Peking University Third Hospital were included in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Those who have taken a physical examination and performed at least one TM test
You may not qualify if:
- Basic information is missing and cannot be retrieved
- The patient was diagnosed with malignant tumor before examination
- Those who have not done any TM tests
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, 100191, China
Related Publications (1)
Welch HG, Albertsen PC. Reconsidering Prostate Cancer Mortality - The Future of PSA Screening. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1557-1563. doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1914228. No abstract available.
PMID: 32294352RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wei Zhao, doctorate
Peking University Third Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 20, 2021
First Posted
December 21, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2019
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
December 21, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
no share