NCT05156164

Brief Summary

This RCT aims to investigate the effectiveness of the early use of Kinesio-taping (KT) together with standard physiotherapy treatment, in the prevention of the shoulder pain of the hemiplegic upper limb following a cerebral stroke compared to conventional physiotherapy without KT treatment. As a secondary outcome, this RCT aims to investigate if KT could improve functional recovery and delay the onset of spasticity. The study consists in two parallel groups of 15 participants each. The treatment and observation period will last 1 month.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 14, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2021

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2022

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

June 7, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

November 14, 2021

Last Update Submit

June 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Kinesio tapePainPreventative CareSpasticityMuscleStrokeRehabilitationFunctional Performance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To assess the change of Ritchie Articular Index

    The Ritchie Articular Index (RAI) is an 4 point index for the numerical measurement of joint tenderness. It grades 0: no tenderness, 1: patient complained of pain, 2: patient complained of pain and winced, 3: patient complained of pain and winced and withdrew. 0 is the better outcome, 3 is the worse outcome. The shoulder joint pain will be assessed

    Initial assessment: after enrollment. Intermediate evaluation after 3 weeks, before the fifth treatment. Final evaluation after 5 weeks since enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To assess the change of FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT UPPER EXTREMITY

    Initial assessment: after enrollment. Intermediate evaluation after 3 weeks, before the fifth treatment. Final evaluation after 5 weeks since enrollment

  • To assess the change of Modified Ashwort Scale

    Initial assessment: after enrollment. Intermediate evaluation after 3 weeks, before the fifth treatment. Final evaluation after 5 weeks since enrollment

Study Arms (2)

Kinesio-taping Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional rehabilitative treatment (consisting in two treatments per day of 40 minutes each) plus a bi-weekly treatment focused on the joint complex of the shoulder plus Kinesio-taping (KT) treatment. The Kinesio-taping treatment consists in 4 applications of KT on the affected shoulder to be held for 5 days a week, followed by 2 days of rest to safeguard skin integrity before a further application. 5 KT strips with graded tensions will be placed on the following muscles: 1. supraspinatus with a tension of 70%. 2. infraspinatus with a tension of 70%. 3,4,5) deltoid (3 strips, 50% of tension) A sixth application with a tension of 90% originates at the level of the anterior face of the humeral head and it ends to the lower corner of the scapula.

Device: Kinesio Tape Group

Control Group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Conventional rehabilitative treatment (consisting in two treatments per day of 40 minutes each), plus a bi-weekly treatment focused on the joint complex of the shoulder, plus shame KT treatment. \- The CG will undergo a KT application on the deltoid but without support function with the same frequency and duration as the experimental group (shame-application).

Device: Control Group

Interventions

The application of the KT consists of 6 strips of I-shaped tape adhered to the skin areas of the shoulder

Kinesio-taping Group

KT application on the deltoid but without support function

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with a first episode of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Hypotonia of the stabilizing muscles of the shoulder.
  • Enrollment within 1 month of stroke.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous trauma or chronic tendinopathies of the shoulder musculature.
  • Skin problems such as wounds or hypersensitivity.
  • Severe psychiatric or cognitive deficits.
  • Anesthesia of the hemiplegic side.
  • Severe aphasia
  • Severe neglect

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia

Roma, RM, 00179, Italy

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Huang YC, Leong CP, Wang L, Wang LY, Yang YC, Chuang CY, Hsin YJ. Effect of kinesiology taping on hemiplegic shoulder pain and functional outcomes in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Dec;52(6):774-781. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

    PMID: 27575012BACKGROUND
  • Van Langenberghe HV, Hogan BM. Degree of pain and grade of subluxation in the painful hemiplegic shoulder. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20(4):161-6.

    PMID: 3232046BACKGROUND
  • Ravichandran H, Janakiraman B, Sundaram S, Fisseha B, Gebreyesus T, Yitayeh Gelaw A. Systematic Review on Effectiveness of shoulder taping in Hemiplegia. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Jun;28(6):1463-1473. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.03.021. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

    PMID: 30956057BACKGROUND
  • Griffin A, Bernhardt J. Strapping the hemiplegic shoulder prevents development of pain during rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2006 Apr;20(4):287-95. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr941oa.

    PMID: 16719027BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

StrokePainMuscle Spasticity

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Stefano Brunelli, MD

    I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma, Italy

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized Parallel Assignment
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2021

First Posted

December 14, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion

October 1, 2022

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

June 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

Shared Documents
ICF
Time Frame
Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication
Access Criteria
Proposals should be directed to the personal corrisponding author's mail address.

Locations